You are browsing a version that has not yet been released.
We try to make using Doctrine2 a very pleasant experience. Therefore we think it is very important to be honest about the current limitations to our users. Much like every other piece of software Doctrine2 is not perfect and far from feature complete. This section should give you an overview of current limitations of Doctrine ORM as well as critical known issues that you should know about.
There is a set of limitations that exist currently which might be solved in the future. Any of this limitations now stated has at least one ticket in the Tracker and is discussed for future releases.
It is not possible to use join columns pointing to non-primary keys. Doctrine will think these are the primary keys and create lazy-loading proxies with the data, which can lead to unexpected results. Doctrine can for performance reasons not validate the correctness of this settings at runtime but only through the Validate Schema command.
Related to the previous limitation with Foreign Keys as Identifier you might be interested in mapping the same table structure as given above to an array. However this is not yet possible either. See the following example:
This schema should be mapped to a Product Entity as follows:
attribute_name column contains the key and
attribute_value contains the value of each array element in
The feature request for persistence of primitive value arrays is described in the DDC-298 ticket.
A Persister in Doctrine is an object that is responsible for the hydration and write operations of an entity against the database. Currently there is no way to overwrite the persister implementation for a given entity, however there are several use-cases that can benefit from custom persister implementations:
PHP Arrays are ordered hash-maps and so should be the
Doctrine\Common\Collections\Collection interface. We plan to
evaluate a feature that optionally persists and hydrates the keys
of a Collection instance.
It is not possible to map several equally looking tables onto one entity. For example if you have a production and an archive table of a certain business concept then you cannot have both tables map to the same entity.
Doctrine ORM will never include a behavior system like Doctrine 1 in the core library. We don't think behaviors add more value than they cost pain and debugging hell. Please see the many different blog posts we have written on this topics:
- Doctrine2 "Behaviors" in a Nutshell
- A re-usable Versionable behavior for Doctrine2
- Write your own ORM on top of Doctrine2
- Doctrine ORM Behavioral Extensions
Doctrine ORM has enough hooks and extension points so that you can add whatever you want on top of it. None of this will ever become core functionality of Doctrine2 however, you will have to rely on third party extensions for magical behaviors.
NestedSet was offered as a behavior in Doctrine 1 and will not be included in the core of Doctrine ORM. However there are already two extensions out there that offer support for Nested Set with ORM:
The use of traits in entity or mapped superclasses, at least when they include mapping configuration or mapped fields, is currently not endorsed by the Doctrine project. The reasons for this are as follows.
Traits were added in PHP 5.4 more than 10 years ago, but at the same time more than two years after the initial Doctrine 2 release and the time where core components were designed.
In fact, this documentation mentions traits only in the context of overriding field association mappings in subclasses. Coverage of traits in test cases is practically nonexistent.
Thus, you should at least be aware that when using traits in your entity and mapped superclasses, you will be in uncharted terrain.
There be dragons.
From a more technical point of view, traits basically work at the language level as if the code contained in them had been copied into the class where the trait is used, and even private fields are accessible by the using class. In addition to that, some precedence and conflict resolution rules apply.
When it comes to loading mapping configuration, the annotation and attribute drivers rely on PHP reflection to inspect class properties including their docblocks. As long as the results are consistent with what a solution without traits would have produced, this is probably fine.
XML mapping configuration probably needs to completely re-configure or otherwise copy-and-paste configuration for fields used from traits.
The Known Issues section describes critical/blocker bugs and other issues that are either complicated to fix, not fixable due to backwards compatibility issues or where no simple fix exists (yet). We don't plan to add every bug in the tracker there, just those issues that can potentially cause nightmares or pain of any sort.
See bugs, improvement and feature requests on Github issues.
For compatibility reasons between all the supported vendors and edge case problems Doctrine ORM does NOT do automatic identifier quoting. This can lead to problems when trying to get legacy-databases to work with Doctrine ORM.
- You can quote column-names as described in the Basic-Mapping section.
- You cannot quote join column names.
- You cannot use non [a-zA-Z0-9_]+ characters, they will break several SQL statements.
Having problems with these kind of column names? Many databases support all CRUD operations on views that semantically map to certain tables. You can create views for all your problematic tables and column names to avoid the legacy quoting nightmare.
Doctrine assumes that you use
DateTime2 data-types. If your legacy database contains DateTime
datatypes then you have to add your own data-type (see Basic Mapping for an example).
Doctrine cannot provide atomic operations when calling
EntityManager#flush() if one
of the tables involved uses the storage engine MyISAM. You must use InnoDB or
other storage engines that support transactions if you need integrity.