[DDC-530] Create tests and documentation for possibilities of mixing inheritance mapping strategies Created: 19/Apr/10  Updated: 19/Apr/10

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.0-BETA1
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Security Level: All

Type: Task Priority: Minor
Reporter: Roman S. Borschel Assignee: Roman S. Borschel
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

It is (theoretically) possible to use different inheritance mapping strategies in the same class hierarchy as long as the different subtrees that use different mapping strategies do not have a common ancestor entity. We should add some tests for that and mention it in the docs about inheritance mapping in a new subsection "Mixing Inheritance Mapping Strategies".






[DDC-473] Inadequate description for @MappedSuperclass in Annotations Reference Created: 25/Mar/10  Updated: 26/Aug/10

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Documentation
Affects Version/s: 2.0-ALPHA4
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Minor
Reporter: David Abdemoulaie Assignee: Jonathan H. Wage
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

See: http://www.doctrine-project.org/documentation/manual/2_0/en/annotations-reference#ann_mappedsuperclass

@MappedSuperclass

An mapped superclass is an abstract or concrete class that provides persistent entity state and mapping information for its subclasses, but which is not itself an entity. This annotation is specified on the Class docblock and has no additional attributes.

This doesn't adequately communicate how to use it. It took me several minutes of failing before I downloaded the PDF and did a search for @MappedSuperclass to find an example of how it's used.

Specifically the following were unclear:

  • Is this defined on the superclass or on the children classes?
  • If it's defined on the child classes, does it take parameters? The name of the super class?
  • It was not at all apparent to me that it was mutually exclusive with the @Entity tag


 Comments   
Comment by David Abdemoulaie [ 25/Mar/10 ]

Apparently it's also incompatible with several other tag as well.

I thought it made sense to try the following and see if the @InheritanceType and @Discriminator___ tags would apply to the children classes:

/**
 * @MappedSuperclass
 * @InheritanceType("SINGLE_TABLE")
 * @DiscriminatorColumn(name="type", type="string")
 * @DiscriminatorMap({"User" = "User", "Group" = "Group"})
 */
abstract class Principal

But apparently this flags D2 to treat it as an Entity anyway, resulting in the following error:

PDOException: SQLSTATE[42S02]: Base table or view not found: 1146 Table 'sentact5.principal'
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 28/Mar/10 ]

I updated the documentation, the question is if we should check for the mapped superclass attribute and throw exceptions if other entity level annotations are specified.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 15/Apr/10 ]

A mapped superclass has not many restrictions and these are mentioned in the docs (i.e. only unidirectional associations), what David mentions above should work, if it doesnt its a bug, I think DDC-511 looks like that same issue.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 15/Apr/10 ]

David,

@"Is this defined on the superclass or on the children classes?"

It doesnt matter. A @MappedSuperclass can be anywhere in an inheritance hierarchy and it always does the same thing, inherit its mapping information to subclasses (but its not itself an entity). The docs say:

Mapped superclasses, just as regular, non-mapped classes, can appear in the middle of an otherwise mapped inheritance hierarchy (through Single Table Inheritance or Class Table Inheritance).

as well as

Entities support inheritance, polymorphic associations, and polymorphic queries. Both abstract and concrete classes can be entities. Entities may extend non-entity classes as well as entity classes, and non-entity classes may extend entity classes.

So entities, mapped superclasses and plain non-mapped classes can appear mixed in an inheritance hierarchy. Nevertheless all the classes in a hierarchy that are entities must use 1 inheritance strategy, you can not mix inheritance mapping strategies in a single class hierarchy.

@"If it's defined on the child classes, does it take parameters? The name of the super class?"

No, it doesnt. The docs dont mention any parameters either which is correct.

@"It was not at all apparent to me that it was mutually exclusive with the @Entity tag"

OK, that needs to be made clearer in the docs then.





[DDC-1695] SQLs for PostgreSQL case sensite tables/fields are wrongly generated Created: 09/Mar/12  Updated: 06/Aug/14

Status: Reopened
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.1.6, 2.4.2
Fix Version/s: 2.1.7, 2.2.2
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Ignacio Larranaga Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

PostgreSQL 9.x, Symfony 2


Attachments: Text File doctrine-2.1.6.patch     Text File SqlWalker.patch    

 Description   

The SQLs for case sensitive schemas in postgreSQL are wronly generated.

Example:
Schema:

CREATE TABLE "News" (
  "IdNews" serial NOT NULL,
  "IdUser" bigint NOT NULL,
  "IdLanguage" integer NOT NULL,
  "IdCondition" integer,
  "IdHealthProvider" integer,
  "IdSpeciality" integer,
  "IdMedicineType" integer,
  "IdTreatment" integer,
  "Title" character varying,
  "SmallText" character varying,
  "LongText" character varying,
  "PublishDate" timestamp with time zone,
  "IdxNews" tsvector,
  "Highlight" boolean NOT NULL DEFAULT false,
  "Order" integer NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
  "Deleted" boolean NOT NULL DEFAULT false,
  "Active" boolean NOT NULL DEFAULT false,
  "UpdateToHighlighted" boolean DEFAULT false,
  CONSTRAINT "News_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("IdNews" ));

Object (I added quotes trying to generate the SQLs quoted.:

<?php

namespace GlobalTreatments\ApplicationBundle\Entity;

use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;

/**
 * @ORM\Table(name="""News""")
 * @ORM\Entity
 */
class News
{
    /**
     * @var integer $idNews
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdNews""", type="integer", nullable=false)
     * @ORM\Id
     * @ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="SEQUENCE")
     * @ORM\SequenceGenerator(sequenceName="""News_IdNews_seq""", allocationSize="1", initialValue="1")
     */
    private $idNews;

    /**
     * @var bigint $iduser
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdUser""", type="bigint", nullable=false)
     */
    private $idUser;

    /**
     * @var integer $idLanguage
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdLanguage""", type="integer", nullable=false)
     */
    private $idLanguage;

    /**
     * @var integer $idCondition
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdCondition""", type="integer", nullable=true)
     */
    private $idCondition;

    /**
     * @var integer $idHealthProvider
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdHealthProvider""", type="integer", nullable=true)
     */
    private $idHealthProvider;

    /**
     * @var integer $idSpeciality
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdSpeciality""", type="integer", nullable=true)
     */
    private $idSpeciality;

    /**
     * @var integer $idMedicineType
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdMedicineType""", type="integer", nullable=true)
     */
    private $idMedicineType;

    /**
     * @var integer $idTreatment
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdTreatment""", type="integer", nullable=true)
     */
    private $idTreatment;

    /**
     * @var string $title
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""Title""", type="string", nullable=true)
     */
    private $title;

    /**
     * @var string $smallText
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""SmallText""", type="string", nullable=true)
     */
    private $smallText;

    /**
     * @var string $longText
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""LongText""", type="string", nullable=true)
     */
    private $longText;

    /**
     * @var datetimetz $publishDate
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""PublishDate""", type="datetimetz", nullable=true)
     */
    private $publishDate;

    /**
     * @var tsvector $idxNews
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""IdxNews""", type="tsvector", nullable=true)
     */
    private $idxNews;

    /**
     * @var boolean $highlight
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""Highlight""", type="boolean", nullable=false)
     */
    private $highlight;

    /**
     * @var integer $order
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""Order""", type="integer", nullable=false)
     */
    private $order;

    /**
     * @var boolean $deleted
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""Deleted""", type="boolean", nullable=false)
     */
    private $deleted;

    /**
     * @var boolean $active
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""Active""", type="boolean", nullable=false)
     */
    private $active;

    /**
     * @var boolean $updateToHighlighted
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="""UpdateToHighlighted""", type="boolean", nullable=true)
     */
    private $updateToHighlighted;

    /**
     * @var condition
     *
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Condition")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns({
     *   @ORM\JoinColumn(name="""IdCondition""", referencedColumnName="""IdCondition""")
     * })
     */
    private $condition;

    /**
     * @var healthProvider
     *
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="HealthProvider")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns({
     *   @ORM\JoinColumn(name="""IdHealthProvider""", referencedColumnName="""IdHealthProvider""")
     * })
     */
    private $healthProvider;

    /**
     * @var language
     *
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Language")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns({
     *   @ORM\JoinColumn(name="""IdLanguage""", referencedColumnName="""IdLanguage""")
     * })
     */
    private $language;

    /**
     * @var medicineType
     *
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="MedicineType")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns({
     *   @ORM\JoinColumn(name="""IdMedicineType""", referencedColumnName="""IdMedicineType""")
     * })
     */
    private $medicineType;

    /**
     * @var speciality
     *
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Speciality")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns({
     *   @ORM\JoinColumn(name="""IdSpeciality""", referencedColumnName="""IdSpeciality""")
     * })
     */
    private $speciality;

    /**
     * @var treatment
     *
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Treatment")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns({
     *   @ORM\JoinColumn(name="""IdTreatment""", referencedColumnName="""IdTreatment""")
     * })
     */
    private $treatment;

    /**
     * @var user
     *
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="User")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns({
     *   @ORM\JoinColumn(name="""IdUser""", referencedColumnName="""IdUser""")
     * })
     */
    private $user;

    ....

}

DQL:

'SELECT n.smallText, n.publishDate ' .
'FROM News n ' .
	'INNER JOIN n.language la ' .
'WHERE la.languageCode = :languageCode ' .
'ORDER BY n.publishDate DESC'

Generated SQL:

SELECT "0_."SmallText" AS "SmallText"0, "0_."PublishDate" AS "PublishDate"1 FROM "News" "0_ INNER JOIN "Language" "1_ ON "0_."IdLanguage" = "1_."IdLanguage" WHERE "1_."LanguageCode" = ? ORDER BY "0_."PublishDate" DESC LIMIT 6

Notice there are unmattched " in the SQL.



 Comments   
Comment by Ignacio Larranaga [ 09/Mar/12 ]

If there is another approach to specify the table/column names are case sensitive in PGSQL please let me know.

Comment by Ignacio Larranaga [ 09/Mar/12 ]

Just to comment. I also tried the normal quoting.

Example: @ORM\Column(name="`IdNews`", type="integer", nullable=false)

And does not work too because of the same reason.

Comment by Ignacio Larranaga [ 09/Mar/12 ]

Hi, I generate this patch and seems to be working for me (at least what I'm testing right now).

I used ´ to quote tables and single attributes (not relationships) and the SQLs are correctly generated.

Comment by Ignacio Larranaga [ 09/Mar/12 ]

Adding a new patch for another files I need to change.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 11/Mar/12 ]

Formatted code

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 11/Mar/12 ]

Fixed and merged into 2.1.x and 2.2 branches

Comment by Julian Aicardo [ 05/Aug/14 ]

This bug still unresolved for version 2.3.6-DEV included in Symfony 2.3.18.

The patches does not work with this version.

Generated query:

SELECT "0_.id AS id0, "0_."verFirmware" AS verfirmware1, "0_."idEstacion" AS idestacion2, "0_."fechaHora" AS fechahora3, "0_.global AS global4, "0_.directa AS directa5, "0_.difusa AS difusa6, "0_."tempSensDirecta" AS tempsensdirecta7, "0_.vbat1 AS vbat18, "0_.vbat2 AS vbat29, "0_.flags AS flags10, "0_."Estacion" AS estacion11 FROM "RegistroRS" "0_ WHERE "0_."idEstacion" = '1' AND "0_."fechaHora" >= '2014-02-01 03:00:00' AND "0_."fechaHora" <= '2014-08-01 03:00:00'

Notice there are unmattched " in the SQL.

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 05/Aug/14 ]

Julian Aicardo why are you using 2.3.6-DEV? Shouldn't you use a stable version? Is the bug reproducible also with later versions?

Comment by Julian Aicardo [ 06/Aug/14 ]

After changing to version 2.4.2 the bug still there. The same SQL query was generated.

Comment by Julian Aicardo [ 06/Aug/14 ]

The error occurs when try to get an alias based on case sensitive table name, because the alias is generated with the first character of table's name which is ".
Ex:
Table: car Alias: c0_
Table: "Car" Alias: "0_

Is in file SqlWalker.php line 295 in Doctrine 2.4.4:

SqlWalker.php
public function getSQLTableAlias($tableName, $dqlAlias = '')
{
    $tableName .= ($dqlAlias) ? '@[' . $dqlAlias . ']' : '';
        
    if ( ! isset($this->tableAliasMap[$tableName])) {
        $this->tableAliasMap[$tableName] = strtolower(substr($tableName, 0, 1)) . $this->tableAliasCounter++ . '_';
    }

    return $this->tableAliasMap[$tableName];
}




[DDC-3424] Class Table Inheritance - wrong table order on insert with more than one level of inheritance Created: 02/Dec/14  Updated: 04/Dec/14

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.3
Fix Version/s: 2.2.3
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: mohammed Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: ORM
Environment:

Mysql



 Description   

when i use class table inheritance with multiple levels in doctrine :
Account<=User<=Dealer
(Dealer inherits from User, User from Account)
Account has the discriminator column and mapping.
when i persist a new Dealer entity I get a foreign key error because there is no row in the User table.
So the order in which the insert statements are executed:
1) Insert into Account
2) Insert into Dealer (which causes the error)
3) insert into User
Can someone help me thanks in advance.



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 02/Dec/14 ]

Is this also valid for 2.4.x and master? 2.3.3 is a very old version.

Additionally, could you come up with a small reproduction test case? You can check the ones at https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/tree/v2.4.6/tests/Doctrine/Tests/ORM/Functional/Ticket for reference

Comment by mohammed [ 03/Dec/14 ]

This is also valid for 2.4.x and master
this is the test case https://github.com/rogerghost/doctrine2/blob/patch-1/tests/Doctrine/Tests/ORM/Persisters/DDC3424Test.php





[DDC-2721] CLONE - doctrine-mapping.xsd sequence relation-entities Created: 03/Oct/13  Updated: 03/Oct/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: 2.3
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Benoît Burnichon Assignee: Guilherme Blanco
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

I noticed some problems with
the doctrine-mapping.xsd (which apparently is not used to validate the
mapping, but only provided to support code completion in your xml-
editor)

The order in which you define the elements like cascade and join-
column(s) for the relation-entities is currently important since it is
a sequence, but is this really desired? Why force this order? defining
cascade before join-column would make perfect sense as well, doesn't
it.

I looked in the repository and it seems xsd is not valid for all branches 2.1.x, 2.2, 2.3.4, 2.4.0-RC2 and master



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 03/Oct/13 ]

Yes, order is not enforced in the driver itself either, so it could eventually be removed.





[DDC-3825] simple_array slush with empty array Created: 14/Jul/15  Updated: 27/Jul/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3, 2.4, 2.5
Fix Version/s: 2.3, 2.4, 2.5

Type: Bug Priority: Minor
Reporter: Damian Dlugosz Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: dbal


 Description   

I'm using "doctrine/orm": v2.5.0 and have simple_array type.
If I persist the class where the property with type simple_array is empty array() the query fails.

I'm coming with solution, please see the github PR https://github.com/doctrine/dbal/pull/877



 Comments   
Comment by Damian Dlugosz [ 27/Jul/15 ]

I've mapped the field as nullable=false, so it should never be null.
If you cannot merge this quickly, you should at least add an warning in the docs saying that the field must be mapped set as nullable.





[DDC-2679] SchemaTool ON DELETE CASCADE does not work with MSSQL Created: 13/Sep/13  Updated: 15/Jan/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.4
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Flip Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

MSSQL 2008 R2



 Description   

The following queries are produced by:
vendor\doctrine\orm\tests\Doctrine\Tests\ORM\Functional\SchemaTool\DDC214Test.php

ALTER TABLE company_persons ADD CONSTRAINT FK_820EDD048EEC5B5C FOREIGN KEY (spouse_id) REFERENCES company_persons (id) ON DELETE CASCADE
ALTER TABLE company_persons_friends ADD CONSTRAINT FK_EAD47FE9217BBB47 FOREIGN KEY (person_id) REFERENCES company_persons (id) ON DELETE CASCADE
ALTER TABLE company_persons_friends ADD CONSTRAINT FK_EAD47FE96A5458E8 FOREIGN KEY (friend_id) REFERENCES company_persons (id) ON DELETE CASCADE
ALTER TABLE company_employees ADD CONSTRAINT FK_899949F0BF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES company_persons (id) ON DELETE CASCADE
ALTER TABLE company_managers ADD CONSTRAINT FK_B1DEF56BBF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES company_persons (id) ON DELETE CASCADE
ALTER TABLE company_auctions ADD CONSTRAINT FK_6A41FC6DBF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES company_events (id) ON DELETE CASCADE
ALTER TABLE company_raffles ADD CONSTRAINT FK_9D157F46BF396750 FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES company_events (id) ON DELETE CASCADE

The errors:

Msg 1785, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_820EDD048EEC5B5C' on table 'company_persons' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.
Msg 1750, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
There is already an object named 'FK_EAD47FE9217BBB47' in the database.
Msg 1750, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
Msg 1785, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_EAD47FE96A5458E8' on table 'company_persons_friends' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.
Msg 1750, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
There is already an object named 'FK_899949F0BF396750' in the database.
Msg 1750, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
There is already an object named 'FK_B1DEF56BBF396750' in the database.
Msg 1750, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
There is already an object named 'FK_6A41FC6DBF396750' in the database.
Msg 1750, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
There is already an object named 'FK_9D157F46BF396750' in the database.
Msg 1750, Level 16, State 0, Line 1
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.

An explanation why this is happening:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/851625/foreign-key-constraint-may-cause-cycles-or-multiple-cascade-paths



 Comments   
Comment by Steve Müller [ 15/Jan/14 ]

This is a SQL Server limitation as it does not support multi-path cascades for foreign keys.
See here: http://allyourdatabase.blogspot.de/2006/11/multiple-cascade-paths-error-in-sql.html

Not sure what to do about this at the moment...

Comment by Flip [ 15/Jan/14 ]

Yes there is nothing we can do to get this to work. But what we can do is:
1. Build in some detection when this happens and then throw a php exception for this kind of error (yet to be created)
2. All tests which rely on this functionality for SQL Server should be reviewed again. There are two possibilities:
A. The test can be rewritten so that it doesn't have multiple paths.
B. if not. The test has to be skipped for SQL Server.





[DDC-1729] Translate queries into graphs of value objects (instead of array hydration?) Created: 27/Mar/12  Updated: 09/Jun/12

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

In decoupled applications the model layer returns "data-transfer-objects" through the boundary into the controller/view layer. It would make sense to have Doctrine directly generate any data-transfer/value-object from native and dql queries.



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 09/Jun/12 ]

Example:

$dql = "SELECT new CustomerAddressView(c.id, c.name, a.id, a.street, a.number, a.city, a.code)
             FROM Customer c INNER JOIN c.address a WHERE c.id = ?1";

This supersedes DDC-1819.

1. One additional property in ResultSetMapping => $viewModelClass?
2. Changes to Parser (new ... syntax)
3. Changes to sQL Walker?
4. Changes to Hydration (Only object hydration!)





[DDC-1530] HIDDEN values cannot be used in WhereClause Created: 12/Dec/11  Updated: 25/Jan/12

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Guilherme Blanco Assignee: Guilherme Blanco
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   
SELECT  u, u.name AS HIDDEN n FROM User u WHERE n = ?1

Is broken. Error:

SQLSTATE[42S22]: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column 'sclr16' in 'where clause

On a query like:

SELECT s0_.id AS id0, s0_.a AS a1, s0_.b AS b2, s0_.c AS c3, s0_.d AS d4, s0_.e AS e5, s0_.f AS f6, s0_.g AS g7, s0_.h AS h8, s0_.i AS i9, s0_.j AS j10, s0_.k AS k11, s0_.l AS l12, s0_.m AS m13, s0_.n AS n14, s0_.o AS o15, 123456789 AS sclr16, s0_.p AS p17 FROM myEntity s0_ WHERE s0_.a = 1 AND sclr16 <= ? ORDER BY sclr16 ASC 


 Comments   
Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version

Comment by Christian Raue [ 09/Jan/12 ]

It occurs even if the value is not HIDDEN.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 10/Jan/12 ]

@Christian this sounds like a completly different error, please explain why you think this belongs here or open a new ticket.

Comment by Christian Raue [ 10/Jan/12 ]

Benjamin: Because I get exactly the same error message regardless of using HIDDEN. So HIDDEN doesn't seem to be liable here.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 10/Jan/12 ]

Can you paste your DQL and SQL?

Comment by Christian Raue [ 10/Jan/12 ]

Code:

$queryBuilder
	->select('myEntity, 123456789 AS distance')
	->where('distance <= 10')
;

DQL:

SELECT myEntity, 123456789 AS distance FROM MyCompany\MyBundle\Entity\MyEntity myEntity WHERE distance <= 10

SQL:

SELECT s0_.id AS id0, s0_.a AS a1, s0_.b AS b2, s0_.c AS c3, s0_.d AS d4, s0_.e AS e5, s0_.f AS f6, s0_.g AS g7, s0_.h AS h8, s0_.i AS i9, s0_.j AS j10, s0_.k AS k11, s0_.l AS l12, s0_.m AS m13, s0_.n AS n14, s0_.o AS o15, 123456789 AS sclr16, s0_.p AS p17 FROM myEntity s0_ WHERE sclr16 <= 10
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 11/Jan/12 ]

That is expected behavior, ANSI SQL defines SELECT to be evaluated AFTER WHERE.

SELECT 1234 AS foo FROM `test` HAVING foo = 1234

DQL has a HAVING clause as well, not sure it works without the group by. Please try.

Comment by Christian Raue [ 21/Jan/12 ]

So we might just close this issue then?

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 25/Jan/12 ]

Its not a bug, just the error message is supposed to be improved (if possible) in a cheap way.





[DDC-1450] UnitOfWork Transaction Rollback Support Created: 24/Oct/11  Updated: 20/Dec/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

The UnitOfWork does not handle the case very well where a rollback is necessary. Can this be optimized?



 Comments   
Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version





[DDC-1415] EventListener delegate on entity basis Created: 11/Oct/11  Updated: 20/Dec/11

Status: Reopened
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 12/Dec/11 ]

Removed from master, as i dont like the api at all

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version





[DDC-1393] Skipping tables or columns in database driver or SchemaTool Created: 24/Sep/11  Updated: 20/Dec/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.1.1, Git Master
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

There should be a sane way to skip sources of errors in SchemaTool and the DatabaseDriver.



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 24/Sep/11 ]

Idea:

Develop a datastructure of sorts that allows saving information about skipping tables and columns therein when reverse engeneering.

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 09/Dec/11 ]

This is not possible unless you take advantage of Topological Sorting to map class dependencies like we do inside of UnitOfWork AFTER creating the ClassMetadata.

The necessity of having this is mandatory because we can never skip classes that have associations to other ones though FK.
You may try that, but it doesn't compensate the effort. I'd rather mark this bug as won't fix, but I'm leaving for you do that. =)

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version





[DDC-1445] Improve error messages Created: 22/Oct/11  Updated: 20/Dec/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Error messages throughout ClassMetadata validation and UnitOfWork cycles can be significantly improved.

Work is being done on: https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/tree/ImproveErrorMessages



 Comments   
Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version





[DDC-1320] Ship Immutable date time with Doctrine Common, use in ORM - Should implement __toString() Created: 06/Aug/11  Updated: 31/Oct/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Dependency
depends on DDC-1316 Insert statement for joined subclass ... Resolved

 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 31/Oct/11 ]

Has to be pushed back as immutable date time cannot be implemented in userland that well.





[DDC-1308] Add cache for transient information and invalidation for ClassMetadata Created: 31/Jul/11  Updated: 20/Dec/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Two different things have to be improved in the caching:

1. The information isTransient() has to be moved to the ClassMetadataFactory and cached there.
2. The information getAllClassMetadataNames() can be cached
3. A debug/development mode should be introduced, leading to filemtime caching and checks so that you can use ApcCache and such in development.



 Comments   
Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version





[DDC-1264] Add more math related DQL funcs (trig, round, stuff?) Created: 09/Jul/11  Updated: 09/Jul/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None





[DDC-1262] Have proxies copy docblocks aswell Created: 09/Jul/11  Updated: 09/Jul/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.0.6, 2.1, Git Master
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Whenever a Proxy is generated it does not copy the docblocks.

This means when you do something like "$refl = new ReflectionObject($proxy)" you might be in trouble.

However if we add docblocks then we have to make sure that proxies do not magically appear as entities by throwing an exception in the AnnotationDriver.






[DDC-1229] generate entity interactive dialog: id column Created: 27/Jun/11  Updated: 28/Jun/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Tools
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: David Buchmann Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

according to Stof, this bug https://github.com/sensio/SensioGeneratorBundle/issues/21 comes from the doctrine tools implementation:

in the dialog, i first specified that i want a field id of type integer. the result was

[Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\MappingException]

Duplicate definition of column 'id' on entity 'Liip\DemoBundle\Entity\Event' in a field or discriminator column mapping.

and no file was created.

The dialog should tell me i can not create a field named id. (Or better ask first if i want my id column named id or something else.)

It would be nice if it would write some file even if its not valid, with a warning on top. As it is, i lost all my work of specifying fields. (Luckily was just playing around)



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 28/Jun/11 ]

not a bug, its a feature (though a dumb one). Improvement in a next version.





[DDC-1219] Remove dependancy on Collection interface in Domain Objects Created: 21/Jun/11  Updated: 04/Jul/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.1
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: André R. Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Short: This issue is all about being able to use doctrine with naked domain objects without any use of doctrine classes.
I 'm not talking about PersistentCollection here, fully aware of that being tied into Doctrine, but those are injected, this is all about code dependency on ArrayCollection.

Seems like some of the UnitOfWork code is cable of handling other types of arrays, like:

    // If $actualData[$name] is not a Collection then use an ArrayCollection.
    if ( ! $actualData[$name] instanceof Collection) {
        $actualData[$name] = new ArrayCollection($actualData[$name]);
    }

But in __cascade* functions this is not the case in all but two:

    if ($relatedEntities instanceof Collection) {
        if ($relatedEntities instanceof PersistentCollection) {
            // Unwrap so that foreach() does not initialize

2 however have:

    if (($relatedEntities instanceof Collection || is_array($relatedEntities))) {
        if ($relatedEntities instanceof PersistentCollection) {
            // Unwrap so that foreach() does not initialize

Would it be an idea to do "instanceof Traversable" instead of " instanceof Collection"?



 Comments   
Comment by André R. [ 21/Jun/11 ]

Note: If the fist code block is always performed before the last 2 blocks then there is no issue here, just a need to make it more clear in Doc that this is possible but that you should not rely custom implementation as PersistentCollection will be injected when loaded from db.





[DDC-1178] Have access to "original" metadata in events subscribed to loadClassMetadata Created: 27/May/11  Updated: 27/May/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: 2.x
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Miha Vrhovnik Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

If you subscribe to loadClassMetadata you will usually modify the metadata for some classes.
The problem is, that that data has to be loaded from somewhere. But later down the chain you can't get to it. Now data specific to what you need in your loadClassMetadata would ideally reside in the same location.
If we take for example a file, than all data for a specific entity is in the same file.

My proposal would be to add function get(Original|Raw)MappingData into interface Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\Driver\Driver which would either return raw data or data in a object specific for that Driver or null if it doesn't make sense for that driver. Please note, that when loading from e.g XmlDriver we should return simplexmlnode or dom node as loadClassMetadata should be in its own namespace and not pollute the Doctrine one.



 Comments   
Comment by Gediminas Morkevicius [ 27/May/11 ]

Sounds logic, each driver would expect NULL or data (wrapped specifically for the driver used)





[DDC-947] Optmize Code-Generation Strategies Created: 24/Dec/10  Updated: 29/Mar/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Jonathan H. Wage
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

We should optimize code-generation somehow.



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 29/Mar/11 ]

Descheduled to 2.x





[DDC-896] Use PDepend for Code-Generation Created: 27/Nov/10  Updated: 27/Nov/10

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Tools
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Jonathan H. Wage
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Our current code-generation tool has many shortcomings and due to its hard to test nature also many (known and unknown) bugs, as well as high maintenance.

Since people are overusing this tool and I am sort of annoyed by how much time goes into this we should rewrite this in a two-step procedure:

1. Move code into Common so we can share it between ORM, Mongo and CouchDB.
2. Use PDepend to read an entities source file (it generates an AST) and modify the AST with the required changes.

This gives us the advantage of having to maintaining less code for this stuff.






[DDC-810] Issue with detaching entities and updating when using change notification Created: 17/Sep/10  Updated: 04/Jul/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.0-BETA4
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Jonathan H. Wage Assignee: Roman S. Borschel
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None

Attachments: File DDC810Test.php    

 Description   

More information coming soon. Attaching a test case



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 20/Sep/10 ]

From reading the issue i know what the bug is, indeed this sucks.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 28/Sep/10 ]

@Jon: Any more information coming?

@Benjamin: Can you summarize the essence of the issue shortly?

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 29/Sep/10 ]

@Roman: The UnitOfWork (may) still be pushed as a listener into that entity, and still recieve noticies of update. Which may throw notices because the oid hashes are removed everywhere. Additionally you cant serialize the thing because you still got the UoW inside there.

Comment by Jonathan H. Wage [ 04/Oct/10 ]

I don't have anymore information currently. The issue was relayed to me. I will try and find some more information and report back.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 03/Apr/11 ]

There is no way to "fix" this issue, i am turning it into a feature request. There needs to be a "postDetach" event that is triggered where the developer can detach the change notification objects.





[DDC-763] Cascade merge on associated entities can insert too many rows through "Persistence by Reachability" Created: 23/Aug/10  Updated: 04/Jul/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Dave Keen Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 2
Labels: None

Attachments: Text File 0149-DDC-763.patch     File DDC763Test.php     File multipleaddmerge.diff    

 Description   

I think that the UnitOfWork needs to maintain a map of spl_object_hash($newEntity)->$managedEntity for entities that were persisted via reachability during a merge. doMerge should then only call persistNew if the original entity has not already been persisted (if it has already been persisted it should merge the managed entity from the map). The map should be maintained until a flush() or until the UnitOfWork is cleared. The reasoning is as follows.

Imagine we have a simple doctor object with no associations:

$doctor = new Doctor();
$em->persist($doctor);
$em->persist($doctor);
$em->flush();

After the first persist() $doctor is MANAGED so the second persist has no effect and this results in a single Doctor row.

If we do the same thing using merge and persistence by reachability:

$doctor = new Doctor();
$em->merge($doctor);
$em->merge($doctor);
$em->flush();

we get 2 Doctor rows being added.

Obviously in this particular case we should use the return value from the first merge() as the parameter of the second merge which would give correct behaviour.

However, now imagine one Doctor has many Patients and many Patients have one Doctor, all the associations have cascade merge enabled, and further assume that $d1 (Doctor id=1) is already in the database. We now attempt to create two patients and assign them to the existing doctor:

$d1= new Doctor(); $d1->id = 1; // This is a DETACHED entity

$p1 = new Patient();
$p2 = new Patient();

$d1->patients->add($p1); $p1->doctor = $d1;
$d1->patients->add($p2); $p2->doctor = $d1;

$em->merge($p1);
$em->merge($p2);

$em->flush();

This actually results in 4 rows being added to the 'patients' table instead of 2, I think because $p1 and $p2 are getting persisted both as the root objects and then again from the patient->doctor->patients array. Since the cascade merging happens internally we can't replace the array contents with the managed return values without walking through the object graph (in which case there is no point in using cascade merge in the first place). Maintaining a map in UnitOfWork will allow doMerge to ensure it doesn't persist the same entities twice.

I'm not sure, but this might be relevant for cascade persist too.

P.S. Another bug report on this can be found at http://code.google.com/p/flextrine2/issues/detail?id=32 (it basically says the same thing with different entities).



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 29/Aug/10 ]

@Roman A possible fix for this in my opinion is another map in UnitOfWork $mergedEntities = array(); and a patch like this:

diff --git a/lib/Doctrine/ORM/UnitOfWork.php b/lib/Doctrine/ORM/UnitOfWork.php
index 242d84b..1d0d8b3 100644
--- a/lib/Doctrine/ORM/UnitOfWork.php
+++ b/lib/Doctrine/ORM/UnitOfWork.php
@@ -1340,6 +1340,10 @@ class UnitOfWork implements PropertyChangedListener
             return; // Prevent infinite recursion
         }
 
+        if (isset($this->mergedEntities[$oid])) {
+            return $this->mergedEntities[$oid];
+        }
+
         $visited[$oid] = $entity; // mark visited
 
         $class = $this->em->getClassMetadata(get_class($entity));
@@ -1468,6 +1472,8 @@ class UnitOfWork implements PropertyChangedListener
 
         $this->cascadeMerge($entity, $managedCopy, $visited);
 
+        $this->mergedEntities[$oid] = $managedCopy;
+
         return $managedCopy;
     }
Comment by Dave Keen [ 29/Aug/10 ]

I have tested this patch with my application and it fixes the problem in all my relevant test cases apart from one. The test case that's failing is one that persists a bi-directional many to many relationship, so the associations interweave with each other (if you know what I mean).

I wonder if perhaps doMerge need to continue cascading even if it finds an item in $this->mergedEntities

This is the Flextrine code that fails - it results in no entries in movie_artist. This might also be related to DDC-758?

m1 = new Movie();
m1.title = "Movie 1";

m2 = new Movie();
m2.title = "Movie 2";

a1 = new Artist();
a1.name = "Artist 1";

a2 = new Artist();
a2.name = "Artist 2";

m1.artists.addItem(a1); a1.movies.addItem(m1);
m1.artists.addItem(a2); a2.movies.addItem(m1);

m2.artists.addItem(a1); a1.movies.addItem(m2);
m2.artists.addItem(a2); a2.movies.addItem(m2);

// These translate to cascade merges on the server
em.persist(m1);
em.persist(m2);
em.persist(a1);
em.persist(a2);

// Now flush
em.flush();

Comment by Dave Keen [ 29/Aug/10 ]

P.S. This test passes if I translate em.persist() to $em->persist() (not cascading) on the server instead of translating it to a cascade merge; not sure if that helps

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 30/Aug/10 ]

I'd really like to avoid introducing an additional instance variable just to solve this issue but I did not find the time yet to really look into it.

Does someone have a unit test for this already and can attach it to the issue?

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 31/Aug/10 ]

Rescheduling for RC1.

Comment by Dave Keen [ 13/Sep/10 ]

Here is a functional test case containing three tests:

testMultiMerge tests basic merging of two new entities, checking that only a single entity ends up in the database. This passes with Benjamin's patch.

testMultiCascadeMerge tests the more complex case of merging a OneToMany association. This also passes with Benjamin's patch.

testManyToManyPersistByReachability tests the ManyToMany case described above and this fails with Benjamin's patch, probably because doMerge doesn't cascade down entities that it has already merged and some ManyToMany associations are being ignored. Its a bit hard to be certain what is causing this as even without Benjamin's patch this test would fail due to DDC-758.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 15/Sep/10 ]

@Roman i thought about this issue, its not possible without that additional map of merged entities. There is no way we can get that information from other sources.

Problem is rather that the use-case probably only applies in mass-merging scenarios and client-server serialization.

Comment by Dave Keen [ 21/Sep/10 ]

Added another failing test case - adding the same entity from different ends of a many to many bi-directional association to check that there isn't an integrity constraint violation caused by Doctrine trying to add the same row twice.

Comment by Dave Keen [ 21/Sep/10 ]

Attached a patch for this issue.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 22/Sep/10 ]

can you comment why all the additionall stuff is necessary compared to my patch?

Comment by Dave Keen [ 22/Sep/10 ]

It fixes the two additional test cases - testManyToManyPersistByReachability and testManyToManyDuplicatePersistByReachability.

testManyToManyPersistByReachability was failing with your original patch because there are ManyToMany cases where an entity may have already been merged, but its still necessary to add it to an association and continue to cascade. Running the following with the original patch will miss out some of the associations.

$m1 = new Movie();
$m1->title = "Movie 1";

$m2 = new Movie();
$m2->title = "Movie 2";

$a1 = new Artist();
$a1->name = "Artist 1";

$a2 = new Artist();
$a2->name = "Artist 2";

$m1->artists->add($a1); $a1->movies->add($m1);
$m1->artists->add($a2); $a2->movies->add($m1);
$m2->artists->add($a1); $a1->movies->add($m2);
$m2->artists->add($a2); $a2->movies->add($m2);

$em->merge($a1);
$em->merge($a2);
$em->flush();

The other change in my patch is to protect against this case. It ensures that the following code doesn't add the same entity twice to a collection.

$em->merge($m1);
$em->merge($m2);
$em->merge($a2);
$em->merge($a2);
$em->flush();
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 31/Oct/10 ]

I am not sure if the issue here is rather multiple calls to merge that contain different parts of the same object-graph.

There should be a very simple fix for this, call ->clear() after each merge.

I am not sure if this patch drags us into a blackhole of issues with merging.

Comment by Dave Keen [ 31/Oct/10 ]

Calling ->clear() and ->flush() after each merge is a workaround for the simple case, but unless I am misunderstanding I don't think its a solution for cases where the merging is happening automatically in cascadeMerge. I've actually encountered this issue in another project and scenario to do with creating REST APIs and merging JSON objects into entities, and applying the patch fixed it so a) I think this issue might be a more common that we first thought and b) the patch basically seems to work (plus it doesn't introduce any failing cases in the existing test suite). I can actually still find one edge case to do with cascading merging interlinked many to many associations that this doesn't fix, but I was planning to open that as a new ticket after this My feeling is that the current merge already has issues and this definitely improves it.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 01/Nov/10 ]

It cannot happen inside a single merge, single merges use the $visited to avoid infinite recursions, each entity can only be merged once inside a single merge operation.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 10/Nov/10 ]

Added a note into the documentation about using EntityManager#clear between merging of entities which share subgraphs and cascade merge.

Handling this issue in UnitOfwork will be declared an improvement, not a bug anymore and be scheduled for later releases. The required changes to the core are to dangerous and big.

Comment by Dave Keen [ 11/Nov/10 ]

Where in the docs is that?

Just to summarize, the equivalent operation to having multiple merges and a single flush is to call merge followed by flush each time, with the whole thing surrounded by a transaction? Does this have a big impact on performance?

Comment by Dave Keen [ 11/Nov/10 ]

Ben - even given the decision not to implement this (and I do understand your thinking, as it is a major change), is there any reason not to implement the bit that ensures that the same entity isn't added to a collection twice during a merge? I can't think of a situation where this should be allowed, and I have a use case where I get 'DUPLICATE KEY' errors if this isn't there.

Please see attached patch.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 11/Nov/10 ]

What bit of that huge patch is that? Can you extract it into another ticket if thats possible?

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 11/Nov/10 ]

I added it to "Working with Objects" and the descripton of Merge. Its not yet live on the site.

Using this current workaround has a performance impact, since more SELECT statements have to be issued against the database.

Comment by Dave Keen [ 11/Nov/10 ]

Apologies for not being clear - only the 3rd patch (multipleaddmerge.diff) is relevant to the 'DUPLICATE KEY' error I am now talking about, but I'll put it in a nother ticket if you prefer.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 11/Nov/10 ]

please add a new ticket, patch looks good.

Comment by Dave Keen [ 11/Nov/10 ]

Created as DDC-875





[DDC-676] Find a way to test serialize/unserialize of all ClassMetadata properties in isolation Created: 10/Jul/10  Updated: 29/Aug/10

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

We should find a way, using PHPUnit Data Providers or anything else, to check the serialize/unserialize of every property in the ClassMetadata instance, since errors here can be very subtle but dangerous.






[DDC-667] Lock Timeout Query Hint for DQL Queries Created: 04/Jul/10  Updated: 16/Sep/10

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.0-BETA2
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

After the implementation of DDC-178 there is now only outstanding the support for locking queries based on a given timeout.

This will be a DQL query feature only and be available via a query hint:

$query->setHint(Query::LOCK_TIMEOUT, $timeoutMs);

It will be only working on Oracle.



 Comments   
Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 30/Aug/10 ]

If this is to be implemented for 2.0, it needs to happen for RC1, therefore rescheduling to RC1. Feel free to reschedule to 2.x if necessary.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 16/Sep/10 ]

Only oracle supports lock timeouts and no other vendor seems to plan to support it. I move to 2.x, but i guess this would rather be an issue of user extension.





[DDC-668] add upsert support Created: 04/Jul/10  Updated: 20/Dec/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Lukas Kahwe Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 4
Labels: None


 Description   

Didnt find anything in the docs on this. Is D2 capable of doing an UPSERT [1] in case I am trying to persist an object that may or may not have been saved previously. Different RDBMS support different syntax for this case. Like MySQL has INSERT .. ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE (or even INSERT IGNORE) while the SQL standard defines a MERGE syntax which seems to be gaining support. Of course you can always fallback to a SELECT FOR UPDATE (or if you want to be hacky an INSERT which catches duplicate key violations .. but probably not a good idea since many RDBMS rollback on a failure inside a transaction).

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upsert

See also http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3011 asking for MERGE support

Ideally there would be a way to define on a model or model instance level if merge logic should be applied.



 Comments   
Comment by Robert Burkhead [ 09/Jul/10 ]

Doctrine_Record defines a replace() method.

In the MySQL Doctrine implementation, however, it is not the same as INSERT .. ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE. The replace() method implemented in Doctrine_Connection_Mysql uses the REPLACE INTO syntax, which is a DELETE and then INSERT when the key exists. This is fine, except for tables that use auto-increment fields. The delete-then-insert operation yields a new auto-incremented value, whereas INSERT .. ON DUPLICTATE KEY UPDATE would not.

Comment by Lukas Kahwe [ 09/Jul/10 ]

MySQL (and SQLite) REPLACE is a no go. It causes way too much disc I/O and worse yet totally screws up the on disk data structures because of the deleting.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 31/Jul/11 ]

Scheduled for 2.2

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 31/Jul/11 ]

Evaluating this makes me sad, except MySQL support for this is rather non-existant, and the oracle merge is aiming at batch operations.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 22/Oct/11 ]

Should this be done with

1. Select first, then insert
2. Catch and evaluate exception then update

I am leaning towards 1.

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version





Allow @Id on @ManyToOne fields (DDC-117)

[DDC-658] Reverse engineering with Oracle (DBDriver and Associations as Identifier) Created: 27/Jun/10  Updated: 11/Dec/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Sub-task Priority: Major
Reporter: Mickael Perraud Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: None
Environment:

Ubuntu 10.04 + Oracle 11g Entreprise + PHP 5.3.2 + Doctrine2 Git (up-to-date)



 Description   

I am playing with reverse engineering with Oracle and I have some problems:

My schema:

drop table PHONE_NUMBER;
drop table CUSTOMER;

create table CUSTOMER (
   CUSTOMER_ID             NUMBER(4)                       not null,
   CUSTOMER_LASTNAME       VARCHAR2(50)                    not null,
   CUSTOMER_MODIFIED       DATE,
   constraint PK_CUSTOMER primary key (CUSTOMER_ID)
         using index
       tablespace TBS_INDEX
       storage
       (
           initial 100K
           next 100K
       )
)
storage
(
    initial 100K
    next 100K
)
tablespace TBS_DATA;

create table PHONE_NUMBER (
   PHONE_NUMBER_ID         NUMBER(4)                       not null,
   CUSTOMER_ID             NUMBER(4)                       not null,
   PHONE_NUMBER            VARCHAR2(50)                    not null,
   PHONE_NUMBERMODIFIED    DATE,
   constraint PK_PHONE_NUMBER primary key (PHONE_NUMBER_ID, CUSTOMER_ID)
         using index
       tablespace TBS_INDEX
       storage
       (
           initial 100K
           next 100K
       )
)
storage
(
    initial 100K
    next 100K
)
tablespace TBS_DATA;

alter table PHONE_NUMBER
   add constraint PHONE_NUMBER__CUSTOMER foreign key (CUSTOMER_ID)
      references CUSTOMER (CUSTOMER_ID);

I obtain "Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\MappingException' with message 'Property "customerId" in "PhoneNumber" was already declared, but it must be declared only once'"

It's because a foreign key is a component of the primary key.



 Comments   
Comment by Mickael Perraud [ 28/Jun/10 ]

This is the continuation of http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DDC-616. Only the schema is different.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 28/Jun/10 ]

just for understanding this scenario:

Is this a One-To-One relation and the TABLE_TEST2 "inherits" the primary key from its parent TABLE_TEST1?

If yes, this construct is not yet supported by Doctrine 2, we still need to include an ID-Generator that supports this kind of schema.

Comment by Mickael Perraud [ 28/Jun/10 ]

Change for a more understandable use case. Note that it's not my real use case and that I work on legacy database on which I can't change the structure.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 01/Jan/11 ]

updated the issue topic to get a better grasp of what needs to be done here.

Comment by waldo [ 09/Jun/11 ]

I have the same error with Mysql whit the same condition.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 28/Nov/11 ]

More details on the work to be done:

The relevant code is in Doctrine/ORM/Mapping/Driver/DatabaseDriver.php only.

The idea is currently many-to-many tables are detected by checking that the table has foreign keys on all the primary key columns (no additional columns!)

Now with the 2.1 feature of foreign key/primary key entities this is not necessarily true anymore. You can have the primary keys being foreign keys BUT have additional columns that are not part of the primary key. This has to be detected.

If a foreign key-primary-key entity is found that has additional columns a ClassMetadata has to be created and the associations have to be created with the "id" => true flag in mapManyToOne().

Comment by Scott Steffens [ 11/Dec/11 ]

For what it's worth, I'm getting this error when I have a PK that is a single column and not a FK.

PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `cycle_station_id` (`cycle`,`station_id`),
KEY `station_id_idx` (`station_id`),
KEY `readings` (`readings`),
KEY `source` (`source`),
KEY `temperature_min_max` (`temperature_max`,`temperature_min`),
KEY `station_id_cycle` (`station_id`,`cycle`,`updated_at`),
CONSTRAINT `compiled_1_station_id_stations_id` FOREIGN KEY (`station_id`) REFERENCES `stations` (`id`),
CONSTRAINT `compiled_1_station_id_stations_id_1` FOREIGN KEY (`station_id`) REFERENCES `stations` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=160833690 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci





[DDC-624] Partial object query that leaves out an association to avoid loading it fetches the association anyway. Created: 03/Jun/10  Updated: 14/Oct/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.0-BETA1
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Roman S. Borschel Assignee: Guilherme Blanco
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 2
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
is duplicated by DDC-1465 Fetching partial objects doesn't work... Open

 Description   

Assuming:

Customer <onetoone> Cart

where Cart is the owning side.

Since the association from Customer to Cart can not be lazy, it would make sense to leave out the association in a query to avoid loading the carts like this:

select partial c.{id,name, ... anything except cart} from Customer c"

But this is ignored and the carts of all customers are fetched anyway. Query::HINT_FORCE_PARTIAL_LOAD is an alternative solution, however it has the disadvantage that it disables lazy-loading for all queried objects. If partial querying would honor associations this would allow more fine-grained control.



 Comments   
Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 26/Aug/10 ]

Might need to be pushed back to a 2.0.x / 2.x.x bugfix release. Not clear yet.





[DDC-1543] Support for Mapping Files on Traits Created: 17/Dec/11  Updated: 17/Dec/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

With PHP 5.4 and traits coming we should find a way where you can add xml and yml configurations for a trait and upon loading an entity X, it also loads the trait configuration of this entity.






[DDC-1852] Doctrine\ORM\Tools\SchemaValidator should check validity of lifecycle callbacks Created: 04/Jun/12  Updated: 17/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Marco Pivetta Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

The schema validator should analyze mapped lifecycle callbacks and:

a) if some lifecycle callbacks were defined, but no @HasLifecycleCallbacks annotation/mapping was set, warn the user
b) if some lifecycle callbacks were defined, but methods are not public, warn the user



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 04/Jun/12 ]

Existing PR at https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/361





[DDC-128] Consider adding EntityManager#link/unlink methods for direct association manipulation Created: 07/Nov/09  Updated: 24/Feb/15

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.0-ALPHA2
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Roman S. Borschel Assignee: Roman S. Borschel
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Reference
is referenced by DDC-546 New fetch mode EXTRA_LAZY for collect... Resolved

 Description   

A problem when working with collection-valued associations is that almost all operations except add($obj) require the collection to become initialized in order for the operation to be performed properly. While this is all correct and beautiful OO-wise it may be problematic at times with regards to performance. Hence we might want to consider to provide some convenient methods along the lines of link/unlink (name suggestions?) which allow more direct, less OO collection manipulation. Such methods obviously would bypass the normal object lifecycle and the changes done through these methods will not be reflected in the in-memory objects and collections, unless the user keeps them in-synch himself.



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 11/Dec/09 ]

Questions

  • I suppose link and unlinked entities would then handled by UnitOfwork commit also?
  • Since the collection is not initialized, one does not know upfront if the action will be successful, what happens if:
    • an entity is linked with a collection, although they are already connected.
    • an entity is unlinked from a collection it is not in.

Regarding the naming, i like link/unlink.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 17/Dec/09 ]

What do you mean by "handled by UnitOfWork commit" ? Whether the SQL is "scheduled" or executed immediately? Interesting question.
Scheduling would probably be better but also more difficult.

As far as usage is concerned, I currently imagine it as follows:

// EntityManager#link($sourceObj, $field, $targetObj)
$user = $em->getReference($userId); // $userId probably from request parameters
$address = $em->getReference($addressId); // $addressId probably from request parameters
$em->link($user, 'addresses', $address);

"What happens if: an entity is linked with a collection, although they are already connected."

Probably an SQL error which results in an exception from the driver. Depends on the database constraints though.

"What happens if: an entity is unlinked from a collection it is not in"

Probably nothing, at least not from the SQL side. An exception could be thrown from Doctrine itself if the update affected 0 rows.

Thanks for these initial questions. Thats definitely food for thought. Keep it coming.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 26/Aug/10 ]

Pushed back.





[DDC-1200] Derived Id Generator Created: 09/Jun/11  Updated: 09/Nov/11

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 6
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
is duplicated by DDC-1315 ORM\Id\AssignedGenerator doesn't work... Resolved

 Description   

For usage with the foreign key as primary key features described in DDC-117 a derived id generator would be tons of useful. It is essentially a post generate id generator (sort of late pre insert though) assigned generator.



 Comments   
Comment by Daniel Lima [ 09/Nov/11 ]

When this will be fixed?

I think this is related to http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user/browse_thread/thread/7e1cfa9c4c99af31





[DDC-298] Allow Entity to hold a collection of a single primitive type Created: 02/Feb/10  Updated: 20/Dec/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.1
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 6
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
is duplicated by DDC-2806 @ElementCollection does work as expected Resolved

 Description   

Sometimes you want to save arbitrary information for an entity using a key -> value array-structure. JPA supports this by means of the @ElementCollection annotation with allows to specify HashMaps for example.

I propose a new AssocationMapping called "ElementMapping" / "ElementCollection" and annotations (options):

ElementCollection
+ elementTable
+ keyType
+ keyLength
+ keyColumnDefinition
+ valueType
+ valueLength
+ valueColumnDefinition

The key and value definitions are necessary for converting and schema generation.

The implementation would make use of the PersistentCollection at all times and work as any other persistent collection just with primitive types.

Restrictions for a first implementation:

  • Only available as a Lazy-Load Collection, no hydration with the source entity
  • Can't be used in queries alike "entity.colname.key = ?1"

Use-Case:

$entity->options['foo'] = 'bar';
$entity->options['bar'] = 'baz';

This could be done for 2.0 imho, adding the necessary changes and optimizations could then be scheduled for 2.1



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 02/Feb/10 ]

In this implementation Schema-Tool would generate a table:

elementTable (entity_id-1, ..., entity_id-n, key, value) and using the Platform Type Generation of keyType and valueType

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 02/Feb/10 ]

Column Names should be Change-able also since there could be people who name their primary keys "key" and "value" o_O

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 02/Feb/10 ]

Ordering could be implemented on top of this using the @OrderColumn JPA implementation by adding another column to the table with a numeric order that will be "order by"'d on select time.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 24/Dec/10 ]

Pushed back

Comment by Richard Michael Coo [ 10/Oct/13 ]

Any news on this? It has been almost 3 years since its last update =)





[DDC-585] Create a coding standards document Created: 13/May/10  Updated: 20/Jul/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Documentation Priority: Major
Reporter: Roman S. Borschel Assignee: Jonathan H. Wage
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: CS

Issue Links:
Reference
is referenced by DDC-3841 [GH-1470] [CI] Added dev requirement ... Open
is referenced by DDC-2408 [GH-649] Update coding standards Resolved

 Description   

We need a new coding standards document for Doctrine 2.



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Morel [ 29/Jan/13 ]

Has there been any work on a coding standards document yet?
I'm currently working on fixing documentation on this project, and it might be a good time to define a standard.
I've started compiling a few recommendations based on various feedbacks I've got in my pull requests, and I can post them here.
Please let me know if there have been previous attempts so far!

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 29/Jan/13 ]

Benjamin Morel Guilherme Blanco may have a CS ruleset, but it's not ready yet. Perfect timing btw, we really need to automate this to avoid having all these useless CS fix comments in pull requests

Comment by Benjamin Morel [ 29/Jan/13 ]

Ok, I'll post my document here once ready, and Guilherme Blanco will be able to compare it with his ruleset!

Comment by Benjamin Morel [ 30/Jan/13 ]

Here is a first draft: https://gist.github.com/4676670

Please comment!

Comment by Benjamin Morel [ 11/Feb/13 ]

Guilherme Blanco, if you don't have time to compare your ruleset with my draft, maybe you could publish your current ruleset so that others can have a look?

Comment by Benjamin Morel [ 02/Aug/13 ]

Any update guys? I'm willing to spend some time on this work, but if no one answers, we won't be going forward

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 02/Aug/13 ]

Benjamin Morel I think a pull request against the doctrine website (https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine-website-sphinx) would be fine...

Comment by Steve Müller [ 17/Apr/14 ]

This should go into https://github.com/doctrine/coding-standard repo (long term).

Comment by Phansys [ 14/Jul/15 ]

Could we define PSR-2 as base?

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 15/Jul/15 ]

Please just refer to https://github.com/doctrine/coding-standard, which is already PSR-2 based (with variations and more strictness)

Comment by Phansys [ 15/Jul/15 ]

@ocramius, Is there a rule for spaces arround `!` operator? https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/1133#discussion_r17459791

Comment by Phansys [ 15/Jul/15 ]

I just found another set of rules inside https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/14ff7f50cfea67d8a4dca37b8ca364d2a83b9864/CONTRIBUTING.md#coding-standard. Which is the current valid standard?

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 15/Jul/15 ]

Phansys yes, that's doctrine specific (spaces around {{ ! }} )

Comment by Phansys [ 15/Jul/15 ]

Perfect! https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/PHP-CS-Fixer/pull/1303
What about the disambiguation between the CS? https://github.com/doctrine/coding-standard/tree/master/Docs#doctrine-coding-standard vs https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/14ff7f50cfea67d8a4dca37b8ca364d2a83b9864/CONTRIBUTING.md#coding-standard





[DDC-1373] Map file with specific class Created: 13/Sep/11  Updated: 14/Feb/12

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: 2.1.1
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Thomas Tourlourat - Armetiz Assignee: Fabio B. Silva
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

Debian LAMP - PHP5.3 - Apache 2



 Description   

Hi there,
AbsractFileDriver is using the filename to know the managed class.

It's a cool feature because it's allow loading on-demand.
The problem is, that the filename must be the name of the Class.

It should be great to be able to manually map XML/YAML File description to a Class, like :
$drivers->addMappingFile ( array ( "filename" => "class", "filename2" => "class2") );

This feature is simple to implement, just add a new array inside AbsractFileDriver to know the mapping.
When using the current method with addPaths, parse the folder to get traditional XML/YAML file where filename corresponding to classname and add it to the mapping array.

AbsractFileDriver->getAllClassNames () just return value of mapping array.
The mapping array is store inside cache.

With this new feature, it allow developers to create a pretty folder that contains entities mapping.

Armetiz.



 Comments   
Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version





[DDC-1370] preInsert, postInsert, prePersist, postPersist, preUpdate, postUpdate code and documentation of events Created: 09/Sep/11  Updated: 26/Feb/14

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Guilherme Blanco Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: None


 Description   

Currently we have a set of Lifecycle events, but they seem to be misleading both in actual implementation and documentation.

One good example is prePersist and postPersist, which is only fired when you're creating new entities. It should be renamed to preInsert and postInsert.
As of preUpdate and postUpdate, they seem quite valid.

But if we rename prePersist and postPersist to (pre|post)Insert, we may have a situation where you wanna cover both insert and update.
For this, (pre|post)Persist should be reinstated, but acting differently from what it does currently.



 Comments   
Comment by Rafael Dohms [ 09/Sep/11 ]

Also, documentation for post* methods is broken at the website:

"Changes in here are not relevant to the persistence in the database, but you can use this events to"

It cuts off in mid-sentence.

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 09/Dec/11 ]

RDohms, this paragraph was already sorted out.

The actual ticket is still valid here.

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 20/Dec/11 ]

Updating fix version

Comment by Matt McNeill [ 26/Feb/14 ]

Commenting here to say that this caused a lot of headaches for our project until we got it sorted out what these events really do.

The problem is that the term 'persist' is ambiguous - it means both persist and update in the context of the persist() function call, but only means INSERT in the context of the event system.





[DDC-838] SchemaTool - ignores the attribute uniq in relations Created: 13/Oct/10  Updated: 29/Oct/10

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Tools
Affects Version/s: 2.0-BETA4
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Minor
Reporter: gektor Assignee: Roman S. Borschel
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

Ubuntu, PHP 5.3.2, MySQL



 Description   
Mapper
<entity name="Default_Model_Test" table="test">
  <id name="id" type="integer" column="id">
    <generator strategy="AUTO"/>
  </id>
  <field name="blabla" column="blabla" type="boolean"/>
  <one-to-one field="user" target-entity="Users_Model_User">
    <join-column name="users_id" referenced-column-name="id" on-delete="CASCADE" on-update="CASCADE" unique="false" />
  </one-to-one>
</entity>
SQL
CREATE TABLE test (id INT AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL, users_id INT DEFAULT NULL, blabla TINYINT(1) NOT NULL, UNIQUE INDEX test_users_id_uniq (users_id), PRIMARY KEY(id)) ENGINE = InnoDB;
ALTER TABLE test ADD FOREIGN KEY (users_id) REFERENCES users(id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE;

Actual:
UNIQUE INDEX test_users_id_uniq (users_id)

Expected:
INDEX test_users_id (users_id)



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 14/Oct/10 ]

Verified, i just don't understand why you are using a one-to-one relation and then "deactivate" the database constraint for this. You could easily use Many-To-One

Comment by gektor [ 14/Oct/10 ]

You are right. It's not a bug, it's feature.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 29/Oct/10 ]

This might still be a good improvement to allow the flexibility, but its not a bug. Updating to "Minor Improvmenet for 2.x"





Add the notion of read-only entities (DDC-209)

[DDC-691] doctrine.readOnly query hint Created: 15/Jul/10  Updated: 31/May/12

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: DQL, ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Sub-task Priority: Minor
Reporter: Roman S. Borschel Assignee: Roman S. Borschel
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 6
Labels: None


 Description   

Setting such a query hint to TRUE should result in all entities being retrieved by that query to be read-only for the purposes of change-tracking. Note that the entities themselves need not necessarily be read-only in general.

This feature is a flush performance tweak that can be used to query for objects but not let the returned objects run through change-tracking on flush. Any other managed objects are tracked as usual so you can do a read-only query for 100 entities and persist a new entity in the same unit of work with optimal flushing performance.



 Comments   
Comment by Konstantin [ 26/Dec/11 ]

Any news?
Why query hint? What about temporary switching like fetch mode changing via query object?

Comment by Gigi Largeanus [ 31/May/12 ]

Any news on this?

I think this is a must have feature. Thanks for all your work.





[DDC-17] Ability to skip the operation from a pre-operation event handler Created: 20/Sep/09  Updated: 26/Aug/10

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Minor
Reporter: Ismo Toijala Assignee: Roman S. Borschel
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

In Doctrine 1.1 it is possible to skip the operation in the event handlers in Doctrine_Record_Listener using Doctrine_Event::skipOperation.

This no longer seems to be possible in Doctrine 2.0 Alpha 1, for example when handling a preRemove event to implement soft-delete behaviour. Perhaps a method could be added to \Doctrine\Common\EventArgs\LifecycleEventArgs to skip the operation, at least before the operation.

Without this implementing soft-delete would require the user to update deleted_at and deleted_by himself and then save the record. It could no longer be done automatically when removing a record because the record is then removed.



 Comments   
Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 20/Sep/09 ]

The problem is, full support for soft-delete throughout the system is not feasible and very fragile. Simple soft-delete through skipping the delete operation is the easiest part. Then you will probably want to modify all DQL queries so that they adhere to it automatically and then there will always be still queries that do NOT go through DQL, like even internal lazy-load queries or native queries or others, which would need to be modified also.

To sum it up, implementing soft-delete "inside" doctrine is absolutely not worth the effort and imho a bad idea and I'm certainly not willing to make lots of adjustments to the core that have a negative impact on performance just to make this soft-delete possible.

I really recommend handling "soft" deletes yourself, the normal way, by simply abstracting entity retrieval and persistence through a DAO/repository layer. As a nice side-effect you get less magic and it still works when you swap out doctrine for another persistence provider.

I am willing to add support for skipping deletes and maybe some other operations through events but I'm not willing to go any further, as explained above.





[DDC-4] Implement support for Concrete Table Inheritance Created: 09/Sep/09  Updated: 24/Dec/10

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.1
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Roman S. Borschel Assignee: Roman S. Borschel
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

A first implementation could probably live without support for polymorphic queries (requires SQL UNIONs to be generated).






[DDC-2570] Doctrine CLI Tools - Clear All Cache Created: 24/Jul/13  Updated: 17/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM, Tools
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: 2.x

Type: Improvement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Frederick Marcoux Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: Cli, cache, orm


 Description   

It would be nice to be able to clear all cache one shot instead of clearing them one after one...

Like this:

root$ ./doctrine orm:clear-cache:all

Instead of:

root$ ./doctrine orm:clear-cache:metadata
root$ ./doctrine orm:clear-cache:result
root$ ./doctrine orm:clear-cache:query






[DDC-391] Allow to specifiy custom Entity and Collection Persister classes Created: 06/Mar/10  Updated: 24/Jun/15

Status: In Progress
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.0-ALPHA4
Fix Version/s: 2.x
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Minor
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 9
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
is duplicated by DDC-3793 Unit Of Work - Proxy injected collect... Resolved
Reference
is referenced by DDC-2637 [GH-769] Add Custom Persisters Open
is referenced by DDC-699 ProxyFactory: allow to overwrite $_pr... Resolved
is referenced by DDC-445 Evaluate possible ways in which store... Resolved

 Description   

It should be allowed to overwrite the default persisters for collections and entities. This should go along the lines of Hibernate which allows to set the custom implementations like:

XML:

<entity persister="persisterClass" />
<OneToMany persister="persisterClass" />

Annotation

/**
 * @Entity(persister="persisterClass")
 * @OneToMany(persister="persisterClass")
 */


 Comments   
Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 19/May/10 ]

Rescheduling for beta3.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 07/Jul/10 ]

Pushing back to beta4.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 12/Jul/10 ]

Moved to 2.1 due to lack of time for any larger new features for 2.0.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 13/Oct/10 ]

implemented this in a feature branch for now, it really doesnt touch any other runtime code so maybe we can still merge this before RC1

http://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/tree/OverridePersisters

Comment by Gediminas Morkevicius [ 25/Feb/11 ]

Is this forgotten? you should merge it since it does not affect any other parts of ORM, this is a great feature

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 26/Feb/11 ]

This has not been forgotten, but the Persister is due for a heavy refactoring for 2.2 probably, when we will make it use the SQL Query object that we are working on.

So I cannot merge this, because the API will probably break big time.

Comment by Jonas Wouters [ 16/Mar/11 ]

Does that mean we will not see this feature before 2.2?

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 16/Mar/11 ]

Yes, that is correct. I dont want to add it as experimental/undocumented feature because people will take it for granted and make us responsible for possible bc breaks.

I will update the target version accordingly.

Sorry for disappointing you, but this feature is fundamentally important at the core of the library. That means we have to get it right and not rush into it.

Comment by Gediminas Morkevicius [ 17/Mar/11 ]

Just as I thought that first you will want to make a query builder object for all persisters. since now they use plain sql. Thanks for all your work on this

Comment by Adam Brodziak [ 11/Jan/12 ]

I might be mistaken, but AFAICS mentioned Persister heavy refactoring did not made through to 2.2 version. Is there any plan to have it in 2.3 or at any later stage?

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 13/Jan/12 ]

@Adam I refactored all Persisters optimizing their code, but I could not complete the move from SQL string generation to Doctrine\DBAL\Query.
We missed it, yes. I may reschedule for 2.3

Comment by Thomas Rothe [ 05/Sep/12 ]

Why is it still missing in 2.3? I would require this for an extension that uses its own overridden entity persister and using a custom persister is the solution that you guys recomend for not overriding the entity manager.

Comment by sebastiaan stok [ 23/Sep/12 ]

Any change seeing this soon? I really need this for a security feature.

What is making this so hard? just adding an setEntityPersister($entityName, $object) should do the trick.
I don't need any fancy stuff, just a way to limit the fields in the SELECT list.

Edit: OK, I'm shot I CAN NOT overwrite the entity manager as the UnitOfWork is private!
Got any other idea?

Comment by Stefan Kögel [ 24/Sep/12 ]

Any chance you could add this quickly? I need this feature urgently to complete an extension using a custom persister. Thanks in advance.

Comment by Lennart Weijl [ 09/Jul/13 ]

What's the status on this issue?





[DDC-3512] Redesign ClassMetadata API as ValueObject based (for type-safety and self-documentation) Created: 17/Jan/15  Updated: 18/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers, ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Critical
Reporter: Marco Pivetta Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: classmetadatafactory, cleanup, metadata, performance, type-safety

Issue Links:
Reference
relates to DDC-3503 [GH-1257] Resolve target entity also ... Resolved

 Description   

The current ClassMetadata API is based on a lot of array juggling (for performance reasons).

While that was understandable with PHP 5.3, all the array access operations are currently:

  • slowing things down
  • making the code very hard to read/understand

I suggest re-coding the ClassMetadata internals (public properties and such) so that well-described properties are defined.

Additionally, as a bonus, we'd get a performance boost by just moving all the class-alias and type resolution logic from the runtime into the ClassMetadataFactory (or similar) API, saving tons of performance at every run.

In pseudo-logic, what I'd like to achieve with DDC-3512 is:

  • base metadata is loaded from the mapping driver
  • onLoadMetadata event is fired for each loaded metadata instance
  • metadata is completed by the ClassMetadataFactory logic
  • onCompleteMetadata event is fired for each loaded metadata instance

This would make metadata manipulation from events a bit messier (user needs to know which value to change during which event), but would allow using better constrained metadata structures in future, and that would disallow mistakes during event listeners execution as well (internal validation).






[DDC-3212] Remove ArrayHydrator logic Created: 14/Jul/14  Updated: 22/Jul/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.5
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Critical
Reporter: Marco Pivetta Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: hydration, hydrator


 Description   

The Doctrine\ORM\Internal\Hydration\ArrayHydrator ( https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/85fbf684363b932a4ebaf543ef059f9ee1e512b0/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Internal/Hydration/ArrayHydrator.php ) is currently very messy and complicated due to the lack of actual Doctrine\ORM\UnitOfWork references when working with it, since we are not dealing with objects.

In order to reduce the amount of bugs and code duplication when working with array hydration, I would simply suggest making use of the Doctrine\ORM\Internal\Hydration\ObjectHydrator ( https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/85fbf684363b932a4ebaf543ef059f9ee1e512b0/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Internal/Hydration/ObjectHydrator.php ) and its siblings, and then extracting data coming from the results in it as an array.

This could be a simple reflection-based extraction (pseudo):

class ArrayHydrator
{
    public function hydrateAllData()
    {
        foreach ($this->objectHydrator->hydrateAllData() as $object) {
            yield $this->extractData($object);
        }
    }
}

The point here is that array-based hydration is not the primary focus of the ORM, and users should probably rely on SQL only when they want array hydration.



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 14/Jul/14 ]

Note: performance is one of our biggest requirements, and array hydration is meant to achieve that. As I stated above, plain SQL is probably better for this sort of operation, so the issue is more about deprecating the ArrayHydrator completely, providing utilities to manipulate SQL resultsets instead.

Comment by Claudio [ 22/Jul/15 ]

I know of some intern projects, where the ArrayHydrator is used. It is right, that an ORM should be about objects, but that also counts for ScalarHydrator, and SingleScalarHydrator, which also aren't Object hydrator. Isn't there a way to reduce the complexity of the ArrayHydrator without ObjectHydrator? It would be a shame when a project build up with DQL Queries need to switch partially to SQL.





[DDC-536] Remove the _ prefix from private and protected members Created: 23/Apr/10  Updated: 16/Apr/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Roman S. Borschel Assignee: Guilherme Blanco
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: None


 Description   

The reasoning is simple: The prefix "_" is usually either used for easier distinction of instance variables from other, i.e. local variables, instead of always using "this." (often seen in C#), or it is used to signal that a member is not meant to be accessed from outside of the class when the language does not have visibility modifiers (PHP4).

Since you always have to use "$this->" in PHP5+ when accessing instance members and there are visibility modifiers, the "_" is largely superfluous and just makes the verbose OO code even more verbose.

Maybe the following find/replace steps will do the job almost completely:

"private $_" => "private $"
"protected $_" => "protected $"
"$this->_" => "$this->"


 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 27/Apr/10 ]

i just found a possible BC issue with this.

EntityRepository is allowed to be extended by us, it has several variables that are underscore prefixed. How to proceed in this case?

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 27/Apr/10 ]

I know but its not really a problem I think. We should just decide whether we make them private in the first place and provide getters instead (which would have avoided this problem in the first place).

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 27/Apr/10 ]

Leaving the prefixes on the repository class only is also an option... but I dont think thats necessary.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 27/Apr/10 ]

can we commit getters for Beta 1 then? We could give everyone a period until Beta 2 to fix their code and then make the change.

EntityRepository is the only class that is meant to be userland extendable to my knowledge, so this should be the only problem to adress

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 27/Apr/10 ]

Yes, you can add getters and commit right away if you want. Plus adding a note on the upgrade document that direct access of these properties is deprecated.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 27/Apr/10 ]

Persisters will be also extensible some day in userland but they need more polish for that, I've already started with it

Comment by Johnny Peck [ 19/Nov/10 ]

Is this still planned? Searching the code base finds this is not being implemented. It would be a good idea to implement the change sooner than later if it will be done at all. Also, +1 for the change. It makes complete sense.

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 16/Apr/14 ]

Moving to 3.0 as this can potentially create BC breaks





[DDC-274] Class and namespace naming inconsistency Created: 24/Jan/10  Updated: 26/Jun/14

Status: In Progress
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Glen Ainscow Assignee: Guilherme Blanco
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: None


 Description   

There are inconsistencies with some class and namespace names that include acronyms.

Examples:

Classes with upper-casing:
ORMException, DBALException, OCI8Connection, etc.

Classes with proper-casing:
RunDqlTask, CliException, MySqlPlatform, etc.

Namespaces with upper-casing:
DBAL, ORM, Doctrine\DBAL\Driver\PDOMsSql, etc.

Namespaces with proper-casing:
Doctrine\Common\Cli, Doctrine\DBAL\Tools\Cli\, Doctrine\ORM\Id, etc.

There is more proper-casing than upper-casing. IMHO, proper-casing is better as it's easier to read "SqlException" than it is to read "SQLException" (the "E" looks like part of the acronym), and things like "CLITask" can be avoided.

I discussed this a bit with Benjamin and Guilherme, and they were unsure and said that the whole team needed to reach consensus.

I'm leaving the priority as "Major" because this should probably be fixed sooner rather than later to prevent compatibility breaks.



 Comments   
Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 25/Jan/10 ]

Increasing the severity and adding a fix version since this MUST be fixed before next release.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 25/Jan/10 ]

I find this to be of rather minor importance. You're talking of compatibility breaks, but thats only the case if we intend to start being very nitpicky about the naming in the future. We are currently not, and we wont be, so not much risk of later breakage.

We have a rule of thumb already: Acronyms up to 4 characters all uppercase, otherwise normal camelcase.

Now, it is often a matter of taste what is an acronym and what not and also not all acronyms have a clear casing, prime example mysql.

Being too nit-picky here is just a pain in the ass and we won't reach a common consensus anyway.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 25/Jan/10 ]

Oh and we better dont start arguing about whats better to read because there is no chance of agreement. If you ask me I find SQLException better than SqlException. So here we go. Lets better not run down this path.

Comment by Glen Ainscow [ 25/Jan/10 ]

No need to get upset, I'm only trying to help.

I just thought that consistency is usually a good idea, either way.

I have to disagree in that an acronym is an acronym, it's not a matter of taste, the letters either stand for something, or they don't.

As for "mysql", only the SQL part is an acronym. So, MySQL or MySql.

Close if you disagree.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 25/Jan/10 ]

I'm not upset. What made you think so? Maybe I should introduce a every now and then.

There's just no point in arguing about readability.

Like I said, we do have a naming standard even if its not adhered everywhere. The standard is also not something we've made up ourselves because we try to avoid that. When we introduced namespaces, we talked about adopting either the Java or .NET naming standards. We opted for the .NET standards. And there its recommended to write acronyms with up to 4 characters all uppercase.

I dont think there are too many violations of that in the code, probably Cli => CLI and some others but most of it looks ok to me.

UPDATE: Maybe we can gather a list here in this ticket of violations? Cli => CLI would be one. MySql => MySQL another. "Id" is rather an abbreviation of Identifier and not an acronym, to me at least.

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 25/Jan/10 ]

It's not a case of getting anyone upset...

But we should fix it and keep consistency of our codebase.

@romanb We should all talk and reach a common sense.
That's our last chance (last alpha) to get this consistency in.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 25/Jan/10 ]

@Guilherme: We do have a naming standard since a year. You want to change the standard now?

Comment by Glen Ainscow [ 25/Jan/10 ]

@Roman,

Just a feeling I got.

This issue was more about consistency (indicated in the title) than moving to proper-case naming.

I think it might be up to 3 characters in .NET, HtmlElement, System.Linq, etc. Anyway, not important.

I agree that Id. is an abbreviation.

There are some more violations. If you decide you want to change them, let me know and I'll compile a list.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 25/Jan/10 ]

@Glen: Yes, a list would be great. I find it hard to be 100% consistent sometimes though because my taste conflicts with the rule. For example, I would prefer "Id" over "ID", especially since it comes directly after ORM "Doctrine\ORM\ID\..." would be a bit too much. But I would not like "Orm" or "Dbal" either. But I think in most cases we can clearly fix the inconsistency. Like CLI or MySQL or MSSQL (or should it be MsSQL?).

Thanks for your help!

We should probably create updated coding standards for Doctrine 2 also, since they differ quite some from Doctrine 1 due to the introduction of namespaces and such. I'll create a ticket for that.

Comment by Glen Ainscow [ 25/Jan/10 ]

I'll do the list for you by tomorrow at the latest, just running out of time ATM.

Id is correct, as mentioned above, so that would be fine. MsSQL is correct (Ms = Microsoft = abbreviation).

Comment by Glen Ainscow [ 25/Jan/10 ]

Found some time ...

Doctrine\Common\Cache\ApcCache -> APCCache
Doctrine\Common\Cli -> CLI
Doctrine\Common\Cli\Printers\AnsiColorPrinter -> ANSIColorPrinter
Doctrine\Common\Cli\CliController -> CLIController
Doctrine\Common\Cli\CliException -> CLIException

Doctrine\DBAL\Driver\PDOMsSql -> PDOMsSQL
Doctrine\DBAL\Driver\PDOMySql -> PDOMySQL
Doctrine\DBAL\Driver\PDOPgSql -> PDOPgSQL
Doctrine\DBAL\Driver\PDOSqlite -> PDOSQLite
Doctrine\DBAL\Logging\EchoSqlLogger -> EchoSQLLogger
Doctrine\DBAL\Logging\SqlLogger -> SQLLogger
Doctrine\DBAL\Platforms\MsSqlPlatform -> MsSQLPlatform
Doctrine\DBAL\Platforms\MySqlPlatform -> MySQLPlatform
Doctrine\DBAL\Platforms\PostgreSqlPlatform -> PostgreSQLPlatform
Doctrine\DBAL\Platforms\SqlitePlatform -> SQLitePlatform
Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\Visitor\CreateSchemaSqlCollector -> CreateSchemaSQLCollector
Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\Visitor\DropSchemaSqlCollector -> DropSchemaSQLCollector
Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\MsSqlSchemaManager -> MsSQLSchemaManager
Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\MySqlSchemaManager -> MySQLSchemaManager
Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\PostgreSqlSchemaManager -> PostgreSQLSchemaManager
Doctrine\DBAL\Schema\SqliteSchemaManager -> SQLiteSchemaManager
Doctrine\DBAL\Tools\Cli -> CLI
Doctrine\DBAL\Tools\Cli\Tasks\RunSqlTask -> RunSQLTask

Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\Driver\PhpDriver -> PHPDriver
Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\Driver\XmlDriver -> XMLDriver
Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\Driver\YamlDriver -> YAMLDriver
Doctrine\ORM\Query\Exec\AbstractSqlExecutor -> AbstractSQLExecutor
(Should Doctrine\ORM\Query\Expr\Andx and Orx be AndX and OrX?)
Doctrine\ORM\Query\SqlWalker -> SQLWalker
Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Cli -> CLI
Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Cli\Tasks\RunDqlTask -> RunDQLTask
Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Export\Driver\PhpExporter -> PHPExporter
Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Export\Driver\XmlExporter -> XMLExporter
Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Export\Driver\YamlExporter -> YAMLExporter

... I think that's it. More than you expected? I did say: "There is more proper-casing than upper-casing."

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 25/Jan/10 ]

No, not more than I expected. It's mostly SQL and CLI basically. Thanks for the list!

We should try to go through that list before beta.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 05/Mar/10 ]

Methods should be adjusted accordingly also (even though they're case insensitive). I already started with that. More to come.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 28/Mar/10 ]

Most of the Cli => CLI changes seem to be complete now.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 26/Apr/10 ]

Pushing the rest of the name changes towards beta2.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 19/May/10 ]

More renamings have been done but still more to do. Pushing remaining work to beta3.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 30/Aug/10 ]

Final name changes should be done prior to going into RC1.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 31/Oct/10 ]

there is much to be done yet, however most of it is also public API class names and might cause quite some BC breaks (i.e. DBAL Platforms and Schema Manager, Mapping Driver Names). I am not sure how to proceed here.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 31/Oct/10 ]

Since PHP is mostly case-insensitive on class and method names it shouldn't be much of an issue.

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 16/Apr/14 ]

Scheduled to 3.0 as this may potentially create BC breaks





[DDC-2133] Issue with Query::iterate and query mixed results Created: 09/Nov/12  Updated: 01/May/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.2.1
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Oleg Namaka Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
is duplicated by DDC-1314 DQL permits partial select using SQL Resolved

 Description   

Consider this code:

$dql = "
    SELECT Page, Product.name
    FROM Dlayer\\Entity\\Page Page
    INNER JOIN Page.Product Product
    ";
$q = ($em->createQuery($dql));
foreach ($q->iterate() as $entry) {
  $page = $entry[0][0];
  $name = $entry[0]['name'];
}

This results with undefined index: 'name' for the second entry.

First result keys are (notice just one array element with index 0):

0
array(2) {
  [0] =>
  int(0)
  [1] =>
  string(4) "name"
} 

but all others are different (notice two array elements with index 0 and the other one that is incrementing):

the second one:
0
array(1) {
  [0] =>
  int(0)
}
1
array(1) {
  [0] =>
  string(4) "name"
} 
the third one:
0
array(1) {
  [0] =>
  int(0)
}
2
array(1) {
  [0] =>
  string(4) "name"
} 

What's wrong with this approach? Is it a bug or mixed results should not be used with the iterate method?



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 12/Nov/12 ]

This is a known issue that we don't have found a BC fix for and as I understand Guilherme Blanco requires considerable refactoring.





[DDC-213] Persist order of collections Created: 15/Dec/09  Updated: 27/Jun/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.0
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Roman S. Borschel Assignee: Roman S. Borschel
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 15
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
is duplicated by DDC-181 Order of many-to-many relationship Resolved
Reference
is referenced by DDC-250 ArrayCollection Key Column @indexBy Resolved

 Description   

A Collection is like a php array, an ordered map. Hence there should be the possibility to persist this order.



 Comments   
Comment by Christian Heinrich [ 21/May/10 ]

Roman, I'd like to do this one as I have currently a use case for this. Do you have any idea of how to do this? What I'm wondering is whether it is possible to implement this without user intervention. (This would simply mean "store the entities as they were added"). But this would need another column in DB that we'd have to add within oneToMany / manyToMany relationships, but in this case one could save a serialized array holding "entityId => position" key / value pairs.

Afterwards, one could easily rebuild / reorder the collection via $collection->set($entity, $order[$entity->identifier]);

If you've got another thought about this, please don't hesitate to point me into the right direction!

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 22/May/10 ]

this won't be implemented until 2.1, since its a pretty complex feature.

Changes are probably required in:

1. CollectionPersister - Add a new collection persister that takes the position into account
2. SchemaTool - Add a 'col_position' column to either the many-to-many or the one-to-many tables.
3. EntityPersister - Use and extend current order-by support to make the sorting happen

You can implement this already though with some performance hit in update scenarios. If you use the ORDER BY support and implement an API around your entity that abstracts those changes and always sets a "position" field on the many entity that is supposed to be sorted.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 22/May/10 ]

I don't think we necessarily need a new collection persister. Simply adjusting the ManyToManyPersister to be able to deal with it might be sufficient.

For OneToMany, that is always persisted from the "many" side, thus there is no collection persister, we would need to adjust the normal persisters.

They key element for the user should be a new annotation (or corresponding xml/yaml element) @OrderColumn. By default the order should not be persistent, only when an @OrderColumn annotation is present. The name of the order column can have a default, i.e. "position". Thus this enhancement of persisting the order should be fully backwards compatible.

Comment by Roman S. Borschel [ 22/May/10 ]

On another note, the getInsertDiff/getDeleteDiff methods of PersistentCollection should already be "ready" for this. That is, when an element in the collection changed only its position, this is already tracked as a change. However the ManyToManyPersister issues no "UPDATE" queries, it simply deletes and inserts. A position change may be more effectively persisted with an UPDATE.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 30/Sep/10 ]

From a mailinglist entry, required check/changepoints:

1. ClassMetadata of Many-To-Many associations have to be extended to publish the required datastructure to the ORM.
2. All Metadata Mapping Drivers have to be extended
3. Persisters\ManyToManyCollectionPersister has to be extended to save the key in the many to many table if desired by the user.
4. Schema-Tool has to be extended to create the additional column.
5. PersistentCollection has to be extended so that lazy loading of collections with additional key works.
6. Array- and ObjectHydrator have to be extended to allow fetch join of collections with key column.
7. Discuss wheather to support this for One-To-Many also with the key-column on the many side. This is much more tricky internally though.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 24/Dec/10 ]

Push back to 2.x, we will have support for DDC-250 first and for this at a later release.

Comment by Thomas Tourlourat - Armetiz [ 07/Feb/12 ]

Hi there,
I'm looking for this feature.

Benjamin Eberlei said that : "You can implement this already", but I don't understand the "how to".

Also,
The problem should be solve if RDBMS had a "natural" order. An order based on item position inside table.

To get this feature without any change on Doctrine, I have remplace the PK defined by the target & mapped field identifier. The new PK is a new field with type "integer" and with auto-increment enable.
In this configuration, Doctrine use the "natural" order of the RDBMS. And I can change order of my item inside Collection and persist it.

It's an very bad solution, but It work before an official support.

Waiting for advices, and solutions,

Thomas.

Comment by Thomas Tourlourat - Armetiz [ 08/Feb/12 ]

Answering to Benjamin Eberlei on the "7. Discuss wheather to support this for One-To-Many also with the key-column on the many side. This is much more tricky internally though.".

I think that for One-To-Many relations, if user want to store the collection order, Doctrine can store the One-To-Many as Many-To-Many with a "model" limitation.
In that case, if storing order collection for Many-To-Many work, it should work for One-To-Many.

What do you think about it ?

Comment by Nicolas [ 29/Feb/12 ]

I think that it must be possible to have two keys ordering : the order isn't obligatory reversible.

For exemple with user and group :

  • You can order groups for one user : with preference by exemple, or importance.
  • And with a different order, users for a group : rank by example.

And maybe more, if you decide to add multi-order : an user show group by his rank in it, if his rank is identical, the order is make by love preference, and after by the importance given by the user (not necessary a number, if we imagine filter on them).

So a default order can be choice with parametized fields and could be :

 
@ManyToMany(targetEntity="Group")
...
@JoinFields ( rank: { type: int} , preference:{type:int}, importance:{type: string, length: 40} )
@OrderByJoinFields({"rank" = "ASC", "preference"="ASC", "importance"="ASC" } )

In this case the order must be optional and would be clean if another order appears in the same scope (DQL...). And manytomany became virtual entities act as other entities except they don't appears permetting in the same time a better conception.

So if the solution take in DDC-181 will become the only solution. This would a good idea to document this. Because, this seems to me a very important point.

My last point is even an unique ordering field created in the join table will be a big and usefull improvement.

Thank a lot for your beautiful work.

Comment by Thomas Tourlourat - Armetiz [ 29/Feb/12 ]

In my point of view, a collection can be order in a single way only.
If you want to add more than one order between User & Group, it's a new collection, a new relation.
Like :

  • User.memberOf() : Group[]
  • Group.members() : User[]
  • Group.importantMembers() : User[]

And it's your role to keep a consistency between members & importantMembers array.

Because ManyToMany join table is the reflection of a state of an ArrayCollection. It's not a usefull feature to be able to store all of the state of an ArrayCollection, even the order of this Array. It's just a normal feature that is really missing

Thomas.

Comment by Nicolas [ 29/Feb/12 ]

I don't think:

If you have three collection, you duplicate one relation 3 times and it's easy in consequence to lost the data integrity and unicity.

By example :

  • Thomas have rank 10 in Admin
  • Thomas think the admin group has importance noted 3 on all of his groups.
  • If a responsable of admin group decide to delete Thomas from it.
  • Thomas, in his ordered list of groups, think always to be in group admin.

So in my idea, the many to many relation isn't just an array collection, but should be an virtual entity. In UML or in Merise method this is a common problem to have a parametized relation. I think an orm should just implement this.

Comment by Thomas Tourlourat - Armetiz [ 29/Feb/12 ]

Hum,
I agree with you.. In a SQL Schema, it's a good choice to add many fields in a ManyToMany join table to description "order".

Comment by Thomas Tourlourat - Armetiz [ 07/Mar/12 ]

I just want to add a piece of Doctrine ORM Document :

"When working with collections, keep in mind that a Collection is essentially an ordered map (just like a PHP array). That is why the remove operation accepts an index/key. removeElement is a separate method that has O ( n) complexity using array_search, where n is the size of the map."

Comment by Thomas Tourlourat - Armetiz [ 23/Mar/12 ]

Hi there,
After several discussions. on IRC, I have changed my point of view.

Doctrine Documentation says : "When working with collections, keep in mind that a Collection is essentially an ordered map (just like a PHP array)".
So, I think that Doctrine have to be able to store or not the order of a Collection. By adding a new field on the Joined table to store the position of each elements.

But I not agree with @Nicolas. Because in his case, he's talking about Association Class : http://etutorials.org/Programming/UML/Chapter+6.+Class+Diagrams+Advanced+Concepts/Association+Class/
Because he's talking of a business logic, he's talking of a dedicated Entity class.

What do you think about it ?

Thomas;

Comment by Thomas Tourlourat - Armetiz [ 31/Aug/12 ]

Any news ?

Comment by Matthieu Napoli [ 16/Oct/12 ]

Hi, any news on this?

If I may add any info to this feature request, maybe something like JPA/Hibernate could be a good start?

See http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/persistence/OrderColumn.html or http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/core/3.6/reference/en-US/html/collections.html#collections-indexed

The idea in Hibernate is that you persist the order of the list in an extra column. This column is not a field of the entity however.

Comment by Albert Casademont [ 27/Jun/14 ]

+1, this would be indeed a very nice thing. We are using the @OrderBy annotation as a workaround but it's not quite the same thing

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 27/Jun/14 ]

Moved to 3.x





[DDC-2390] Remove Parser and SQLWalker dependency on Query Created: 04/Apr/13  Updated: 17/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Query is too powerful to be available in Parser and SQLWalker, because it may lead to accessing data that changes on subsequent runs of a query that is cached.

Idea is to introduce a MetadataBag that contains only the values that are allowed to be accessed.






[DDC-1599] OnFlush event in transaction Created: 14/Jan/12  Updated: 17/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Gediminas Morkevicius Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 3
Labels: None


 Description   

Is there any particular reason why onFlush event is not triggered when the transaction is allready open? https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/master/lib/Doctrine/ORM/UnitOfWork.php#L290 It would help a lot developing listeners since this event is the mostly used one and since theres preFlush now it seems a logical solution if onFlush would be a start of transaction in general



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 14/Jan/12 ]

onFluish is not the start of a transaction. It has nothing to do with this.

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 31/Mar/12 ]

Is a third event needed? Or is this to be marked as "won't fix"?

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 31/Mar/12 ]

Maybe onBeginTransaction, onCommit and onRollback.

However since you can start transactions manually using $em->beginTransaction(), the Flush events are somehwat independent of transactions anyways.

Comment by Gediminas Morkevicius [ 31/Mar/12 ]

Well, user can start transaction anytime, but the fact is that if we think ORM we do not know nothing about the database. we just persist and flush objects.

Yes I think these would be very useful, from how I see it, if you use event listeners, is:

loadClassMetadata: you can apply extra mapping

onFlush: you can modify entity changesets, or persist recalculate new ones, without triggering the database, since it is not used to begin the database modifications yet.

onBeginTransaction: could use the database modifications keeping in sync the entity changesets. the thing about this event is that usually in behavioral way atomic updates are required. for example nestedset tree sync lft rgt columns, sortable sync the sort index, materialized path, all these requires atomic updates, and the best place is the start of transaction.

onCommit: could be useful to execute right before commit, finalizing database modifications could be done.

onRollback: this one is really something, since if you go far, there might be something like files uploaded during the entity processing, and you may want to remove them if transaction fails.

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 21/May/12 ]

This situation was barely documented here: http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DDC-1443

We need a better Transaction API that completely fixes the computation of changesets and also allow more fine grained control over Entities and their corresponding information.

I'd postpone this one until 3.0.





[DDC-1738] Allow multiple Generators per class Created: 29/Mar/12  Updated: 17/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Guilherme Blanco Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

We should be able to support multiple generators per class.
When doing partition per table, the partitioned column must be part of PK, which may enter in our limitation.

Currently we only support 1 generator per class.






[DDC-1963] Remove by-ref access to changeset in lifecycle event args Created: 31/Jul/12  Updated: 17/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Marco Pivetta Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

UoW currently passes computed changesets to lifecycle event args byref. This has to be changed to force users to use UoW public API to modify changesets instead.






[DDC-2089] Modify OneToMany to allow unidirectional associations without the need of a JoinTable Created: 19/Oct/12  Updated: 05/Jun/15

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.x
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Enea Bette Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 2
Labels: onetomany, persister, unidirectional
Environment:

Debian Wheezy, Mysql 5.1, Apache2, PHP 5.4



 Description   

As I sayd in the title, it would be nice if the ORM layer could permit to map a 1:n association in the db as an unidirectional OneToMany in the classes, without using a JoinTable in the database.
This would permit us to get rid of the unnecessary database JoinTable, which creates disorder and decreases performance for no valuable reason.

Is it possible?



 Comments   
Comment by Enea Bette [ 16/Dec/12 ]

A little up... for inspiration from JPA

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence/OneToMany#Undirectional_OneToMany.2C_No_Inverse_ManyToOne.2C_No_Join_Table_.28JPA_2.0_ONLY.29

Comment by Daniel Pitts [ 07/Oct/14 ]

This is also a big issue for Symfony2 forms. It's very difficult to make a form type for a collection of "things", where the "things" are fully owned by the parent object.

Comment by Florian Vogelpohl [ 05/Jun/15 ]

There are any plans to implement this feature?
The unidirection OneToMany with JoinTable is a little bit tricky, because in some cases you can't remove entities from parent. Also its not a real "Object-relation-mapping" because you need to add a (unnecessary) inverse field. This brakes the object domain model.

E.g.: If you have an entity Account which holds a collectionof Members (unidirectional) and now you want to remove a Member from the collection you get an "Cannot delete or update a parent row: a foreign key constraint fails " error ...





[DDC-3183] Add JsonSerializable to Collections Created: 22/Jun/14  Updated: 22/Jun/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 3.0
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Gabriel Bull Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: collection, orm


 Description   

Implement this:

http://www.php.net/manual/fr/class.jsonserializable.php

Can't really make this claim if Doctrine is not implementing basic interfaces for collections:

> The missing (SPL) Collection/Array/OrderedMap interface.






[DDC-3527] Provide a method to retrieve exactly one entity out of entity repository Created: 20/Jan/15  Updated: 22/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Type: Improvement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Dominik D Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Hello,

currently we have EntityRepository::findOneBy() method for retrieving a single or none entities out of an EntityRepository. It would be very useful, if there was a method which retrieves exactly one entity or throws NonUniqueResultException in case of multiple records returned or NoResultException in case of zero results returned (just like Query::getSingleResult() currently does).

Very often I find myself creating custom repositories for a couple of ::findOneByOrThrow() methods only. Needless to say it's quite mundane to do. The bodies of such methods follows the same pattern:

1. Query the EntityRepository using EntityRepository::findOneBy().
2. If the result is null, then throw an Exception.
3. Return the result.

It'd be very nice to have it out-of-the-box in the base EntityRepository.

Thanks.



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 20/Jan/15 ]

We actually want to reduce the repository API, not expand it...

Comment by Dominik D [ 21/Jan/15 ]

Wow, ok. I guess you've got good reasons for it and I shouldn't try to convince you, that having methods for most common use cases out of the box is quite convenient?

If yes, then fine. I can create a common EntityRepository subclass for myself and put any helper methods I want there. This would at least cut down on the code duplication in my codebase.

If what you say is final, then we can close this ticket.

Cheers.

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 22/Jan/15 ]

I guess you've got good reasons for it and I shouldn't try to convince you, that having methods for most common use cases out of the box is quite convenient?

The main problem is that adding API methods to repositories forces any subclasses to also apply eventual filtering logic to those as well.

Other than that, it's merely a question of interface segregation: the current API is hardly maintainable if we assume that many developers subclassed the EntityRepository class, therefore we should keep it locked until 3.x.

I'll actually mark this issue for 3.0 and defer discussion till then.

Comment by Dominik D [ 22/Jan/15 ]

Ok, thanks.





[DDC-3832] readOnly should be renamed to immutable in the mapping Created: 16/Jul/15  Updated: 16/Jul/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 3.0

Type: Improvement Priority: Minor
Reporter: Christophe Coevoet Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

readOnly in the mapping is currently very confusing. Some people are using it to map entities to views, and then complain about SchemaTool-based projects (migrations for instance) because it handles things as table.
But this is not the actual meaning of this mapping flag. Read-only entities can be inserted and deleted. The only forbidden action on them are updates. This makes the naming totally unsuited.

For reference, Hibernate uses "mutable=false" for the feature corresponding to our "readOnly=true".






[DDC-2387] convert-mapping not working correctly with composite primary keys/foreign keys in 2.4.0-RC1 Created: 03/Apr/13  Updated: 31/Dec/14

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 2.3.3, 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: 2.3.4
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Nicholas Van Dusen Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 5
Labels: None
Environment:

Symfony 2.2.0, MySQL 5.1



 Description   

(Apologies if this is somehow a Symfony-specific issue)

I updated my application via Composer yesterday, and received Doctrine 2.4.0-RC1. After this update, generating entities has been problematic under certain circumstances.

Here is an example table in MySQL:

CREATE TABLE `user_email` (
  `user_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL COMMENT 'FK to user',
  `email` varchar(254) NOT NULL,
  `email_datasource` smallint(1) unsigned NOT NULL COMMENT 'FK to datasource_code',
  `insert_date` datetime NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`user_id`,`email`,`email_datasource`),
  KEY `FK_UserEmail_DataSourceCode` (`email_datasource`),
  CONSTRAINT `FK_UserEmail_User` FOREIGN KEY (`user_id`) REFERENCES `user` (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8

In Doctrine 2.3, the mapping works correctly, and you end up with a 3-part primary key, with a user property mapped to the User entity, and a datasourceCode property mapped to the DatasourceCode entity. All good.

In 2.4, the following error is given: Single id is not allowed on composite primary key in entity UserEmail.

Removing one of the foreign keys in the table (either to User or DatasourceCode) but keeping the primary key set to all 3 columns allows the mapping to work. But, if you then remove one of the columns from the primary key (say, email_datasource) it fails again.



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 04/Apr/13 ]

Can you provide the full stack trace to the exception please?

$e->getTraceAsString();
Comment by Nicholas Van Dusen [ 11/Apr/13 ]

Benjamin, I'm not sure how to get the trace for you, since I'm running from inside the Symfony2 doctrine:mapping:import command line item.

Comment by Christophe Coevoet [ 11/Apr/13 ]

Use the --verbose option when running the command

Comment by Nicholas Van Dusen [ 11/Apr/13 ]

I was able to get a trace for you:

#0 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/doctrine/orm/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Mapping/ClassMetadataInfo.php(1571): Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\MappingException::singleIdNotAllowedOnCompositePrimaryKey('UserEmail')
#1 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/doctrine/orm/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Mapping/ClassMetadataFactory.php(422): Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataInfo->getSingleIdentifierFieldName()
#2 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/doctrine/orm/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Mapping/ClassMetadataFactory.php(136): Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataFactory->completeIdGeneratorMapping(Object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadata))
#3 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/doctrine/common/lib/Doctrine/Common/Persistence/Mapping/AbstractClassMetadataFactory.php(302): Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataFactory->doLoadMetadata(Object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadata), NULL, false, Array)
#4 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/doctrine/common/lib/Doctrine/Common/Persistence/Mapping/AbstractClassMetadataFactory.php(212): Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory->loadMetadata('UserEmail')
#5 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/doctrine/common/lib/Doctrine/Common/Persistence/Mapping/AbstractClassMetadataFactory.php(112): Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory->getMetadataFor('UserEmail')
#6 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/doctrine/doctrine-bundle/Doctrine/Bundle/DoctrineBundle/Command/ImportMappingDoctrineCommand.php(108): Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory->getAllMetadata()
#7 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/symfony/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Console/Command/Command.php(240): Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Command\ImportMappingDoctrineCommand->execute(Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Input\ArgvInput), Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Output\ConsoleOutput))
#8 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/symfony/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Console/Application.php(195): Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command->run(Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Input\ArgvInput), Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Output\ConsoleOutput))
#9 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/symfony/symfony/src/Symfony/Bundle/FrameworkBundle/Console/Application.php(78): Symfony\Component\Console\Application->doRun(Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Input\ArgvInput), Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Output\ConsoleOutput))
#10 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/vendor/symfony/symfony/src/Symfony/Component/Console/Application.php(106): Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Console\Application->doRun(Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Input\ArgvInput), Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Output\ConsoleOutput))
#11 /var/www/html/voxrepublic/app/console(22): Symfony\Component\Console\Application->run(Object(Symfony\Component\Console\Input\ArgvInput))
#12 {main}
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 14/Apr/13 ]

The problem is that Doctrine seems to detect that you only have on id field on this entity and then a new function of 2.4 throws this error. I will try to reproduce this with your table. Until then could you show me the var_dump() of the $class variable in Doctrine\ORM\ClassMetadataFactory#completeIdGeneratorMapping()? This would help very much already.

Comment by Maximilian Beck [ 15/Apr/13 ]

I have the same error when using "doctrine:mapping:import"

CREATE  TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `dev_Recipe`.`step` (

  `recipe_id` INT NOT NULL ,

  `step_number` INT NOT NULL ,

  `description` TEXT NULL ,

  `timer` INT NULL ,

  `image` VARCHAR(100) NULL ,

  PRIMARY KEY (`recipe_id`, `step_number`) ,

  INDEX `recipe_id_idx` (`recipe_id` ASC) ,

  INDEX `step_number` (`step_number` ASC) ,

  CONSTRAINT `step_recipe_id`

    FOREIGN KEY (`recipe_id` )

    REFERENCES `dev_Recipe`.`recipe` (`recipe_id` )

    ON DELETE NO ACTION

    ON UPDATE NO ACTION)

ENGINE = InnoDB;
Exception trace:
 () at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\orm\lib\Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\MappingException.php:258
 Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\MappingException::singleIdNotAllowedOnCompositePrimaryKey() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\orm\lib\Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataInfo.php:1571
 Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataInfo->getSingleIdentifierFieldName() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\orm\lib\Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataFactory.php:422
 Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataFactory->completeIdGeneratorMapping() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\orm\lib\Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataFactory.php:136
 Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataFactory->doLoadMetadata() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\common\lib\Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory.php:302
 Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory->loadMetadata() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\common\lib\Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory.php:212
 Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory->getMetadataFor() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\common\lib\Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory.php:112
 Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\AbstractClassMetadataFactory->getAllMetadata() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\orm\lib\Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Console\Command\ConvertMappingCommand.php:126
 Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Console\Command\ConvertMappingCommand->execute() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\doctrine\doctrine-bundle\Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Command\Proxy\ConvertMappingDoctrineCommand.php:59
 Doctrine\Bundle\DoctrineBundle\Command\Proxy\ConvertMappingDoctrineCommand->execute() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\symfony\symfony\src\Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command.php:240
 Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command->run() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\symfony\symfony\src\Symfony\Component\Console\Application.php:193
 Symfony\Component\Console\Application->doRun() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\symfony\symfony\src\Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Console\Application.php:78
 Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Console\Application->doRun() at \htdocs\SF2\vendor\symfony\symfony\src\Symfony\Component\Console\Application.php:106
 Symfony\Component\Console\Application->run() at \htdocs\SF2\app\console:22

"var_dump($class);" returns:

object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadata)#470 (36) {
  ["name"]=>
  string(10) "Ingredient"
  ["namespace"]=>
  string(0) ""
  ["rootEntityName"]=>
  string(10) "Ingredient"
  ["customGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["customRepositoryClassName"]=>
  NULL
  ["isMappedSuperclass"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["parentClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["subClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedNativeQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["sqlResultSetMappings"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["identifier"]=>
  array(1) {
    [0]=>
    string(12) "ingredientId"
  }
  ["inheritanceType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["generatorType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["fieldMappings"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["ingredientId"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["id"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(12) "ingredientId"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(13) "ingredient_id"
      ["type"]=>
      string(7) "integer"
      ["unsigned"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["name"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(4) "name"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(4) "name"
      ["type"]=>
      string(6) "string"
      ["length"]=>
      int(45)
      ["fixed"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["color"]=>
    array(5) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(5) "color"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(5) "color"
      ["type"]=>
      string(7) "integer"
      ["unsigned"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["img"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(3) "img"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(3) "img"
      ["type"]=>
      string(6) "string"
      ["length"]=>
      int(45)
      ["fixed"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(true)
    }
  }
  ["fieldNames"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["ingredient_id"]=>
    string(12) "ingredientId"
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "name"
    ["color"]=>
    string(5) "color"
    ["img"]=>
    string(3) "img"
  }
  ["columnNames"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["ingredientId"]=>
    string(13) "ingredient_id"
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "name"
    ["color"]=>
    string(5) "color"
    ["img"]=>
    string(3) "img"
  }
  ["discriminatorValue"]=>
  NULL
  ["discriminatorMap"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["discriminatorColumn"]=>
  NULL
  ["table"]=>
  array(1) {
    ["name"]=>
    string(10) "ingredient"
  }
  ["lifecycleCallbacks"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["associationMappings"]=>
  array(1) {
    ["ingredientCategory"]=>
    array(15) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(18) "ingredientCategory"
      ["targetEntity"]=>
      string(18) "IngredientCategory"
      ["mappedBy"]=>
      string(10) "ingredient"
      ["type"]=>
      int(8)
      ["inversedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["isOwningSide"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["sourceEntity"]=>
      string(10) "Ingredient"
      ["fetch"]=>
      int(2)
      ["cascade"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
      ["isCascadeRemove"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadePersist"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeRefresh"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeMerge"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeDetach"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["orphanRemoval"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
  }
  ["isIdentifierComposite"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["containsForeignIdentifier"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["idGenerator"]=>
  NULL
  ["sequenceGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["tableGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["changeTrackingPolicy"]=>
  int(1)
  ["isVersioned"]=>
  NULL
  ["versionField"]=>
  NULL
  ["reflClass"]=>
  NULL
  ["isReadOnly"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["namingStrategy":protected]=>
  object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\DefaultNamingStrategy)#258 (0) {
  }
  ["reflFields"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["_prototype":"Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataInfo":private]=>
  NULL
}
object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadata)#472 (36) {
  ["name"]=>
  string(18) "IngredientCategory"
  ["namespace"]=>
  string(0) ""
  ["rootEntityName"]=>
  string(18) "IngredientCategory"
  ["customGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["customRepositoryClassName"]=>
  NULL
  ["isMappedSuperclass"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["parentClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["subClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedNativeQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["sqlResultSetMappings"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["identifier"]=>
  array(1) {
    [0]=>
    string(2) "id"
  }
  ["inheritanceType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["generatorType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["fieldMappings"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["id"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["id"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(2) "id"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(2) "id"
      ["type"]=>
      string(7) "integer"
      ["unsigned"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["name"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(4) "name"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(4) "name"
      ["type"]=>
      string(6) "string"
      ["length"]=>
      int(255)
      ["fixed"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["description"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(11) "description"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(11) "description"
      ["type"]=>
      string(4) "text"
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(true)
    }
  }
  ["fieldNames"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["id"]=>
    string(2) "id"
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "name"
    ["description"]=>
    string(11) "description"
  }
  ["columnNames"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["id"]=>
    string(2) "id"
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "name"
    ["description"]=>
    string(11) "description"
  }
  ["discriminatorValue"]=>
  NULL
  ["discriminatorMap"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["discriminatorColumn"]=>
  NULL
  ["table"]=>
  array(1) {
    ["name"]=>
    string(19) "ingredient_category"
  }
  ["lifecycleCallbacks"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["associationMappings"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["ingredient"]=>
    array(19) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(10) "ingredient"
      ["targetEntity"]=>
      string(10) "Ingredient"
      ["inversedBy"]=>
      string(18) "ingredientCategory"
      ["joinTable"]=>
      array(3) {
        ["name"]=>
        string(30) "ingredient_category_ingredient"
        ["joinColumns"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          array(2) {
            ["name"]=>
            string(22) "ingredient_category_id"
            ["referencedColumnName"]=>
            string(2) "id"
          }
        }
        ["inverseJoinColumns"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          array(2) {
            ["name"]=>
            string(13) "ingredient_id"
            ["referencedColumnName"]=>
            string(13) "ingredient_id"
          }
        }
      }
      ["type"]=>
      int(8)
      ["mappedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["isOwningSide"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["sourceEntity"]=>
      string(18) "IngredientCategory"
      ["fetch"]=>
      int(2)
      ["cascade"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
      ["isCascadeRemove"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadePersist"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeRefresh"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeMerge"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeDetach"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["joinTableColumns"]=>
      array(2) {
        [0]=>
        string(22) "ingredient_category_id"
        [1]=>
        string(13) "ingredient_id"
      }
      ["relationToSourceKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["ingredient_category_id"]=>
        string(2) "id"
      }
      ["relationToTargetKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["ingredient_id"]=>
        string(13) "ingredient_id"
      }
      ["orphanRemoval"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["parent"]=>
    array(19) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(6) "parent"
      ["targetEntity"]=>
      string(18) "IngredientCategory"
      ["joinColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        [0]=>
        array(2) {
          ["name"]=>
          string(9) "parent_id"
          ["referencedColumnName"]=>
          string(2) "id"
        }
      }
      ["type"]=>
      int(2)
      ["mappedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["inversedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["isOwningSide"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["sourceEntity"]=>
      string(18) "IngredientCategory"
      ["fetch"]=>
      int(2)
      ["cascade"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
      ["isCascadeRemove"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadePersist"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeRefresh"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeMerge"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeDetach"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["sourceToTargetKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["parent_id"]=>
        string(2) "id"
      }
      ["joinColumnFieldNames"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["parent_id"]=>
        string(9) "parent_id"
      }
      ["targetToSourceKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["id"]=>
        string(9) "parent_id"
      }
      ["orphanRemoval"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
  }
  ["isIdentifierComposite"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["containsForeignIdentifier"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["idGenerator"]=>
  NULL
  ["sequenceGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["tableGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["changeTrackingPolicy"]=>
  int(1)
  ["isVersioned"]=>
  NULL
  ["versionField"]=>
  NULL
  ["reflClass"]=>
  NULL
  ["isReadOnly"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["namingStrategy":protected]=>
  object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\DefaultNamingStrategy)#258 (0) {
  }
  ["reflFields"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["_prototype":"Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataInfo":private]=>
  NULL
}
object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadata)#474 (36) {
  ["name"]=>
  string(6) "Recipe"
  ["namespace"]=>
  string(0) ""
  ["rootEntityName"]=>
  string(6) "Recipe"
  ["customGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["customRepositoryClassName"]=>
  NULL
  ["isMappedSuperclass"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["parentClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["subClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedNativeQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["sqlResultSetMappings"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["identifier"]=>
  array(1) {
    [0]=>
    string(8) "recipeId"
  }
  ["inheritanceType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["generatorType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["fieldMappings"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["recipeId"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["id"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(8) "recipeId"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(9) "recipe_id"
      ["type"]=>
      string(7) "integer"
      ["unsigned"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["name"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(4) "name"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(4) "name"
      ["type"]=>
      string(6) "string"
      ["length"]=>
      int(255)
      ["fixed"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["description"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(11) "description"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(11) "description"
      ["type"]=>
      string(4) "text"
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(true)
    }
  }
  ["fieldNames"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["recipe_id"]=>
    string(8) "recipeId"
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "name"
    ["description"]=>
    string(11) "description"
  }
  ["columnNames"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["recipeId"]=>
    string(9) "recipe_id"
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "name"
    ["description"]=>
    string(11) "description"
  }
  ["discriminatorValue"]=>
  NULL
  ["discriminatorMap"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["discriminatorColumn"]=>
  NULL
  ["table"]=>
  array(1) {
    ["name"]=>
    string(6) "recipe"
  }
  ["lifecycleCallbacks"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["associationMappings"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["recipeCategory"]=>
    array(15) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(14) "recipeCategory"
      ["targetEntity"]=>
      string(14) "RecipeCategory"
      ["mappedBy"]=>
      string(6) "recipe"
      ["type"]=>
      int(8)
      ["inversedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["isOwningSide"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["sourceEntity"]=>
      string(6) "Recipe"
      ["fetch"]=>
      int(2)
      ["cascade"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
      ["isCascadeRemove"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadePersist"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeRefresh"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeMerge"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeDetach"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["orphanRemoval"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["users"]=>
    array(19) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(5) "users"
      ["targetEntity"]=>
      string(5) "Users"
      ["inversedBy"]=>
      string(12) "recipeRecipe"
      ["joinTable"]=>
      array(3) {
        ["name"]=>
        string(13) "users_recipes"
        ["joinColumns"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          array(2) {
            ["name"]=>
            string(16) "recipe_recipe_id"
            ["referencedColumnName"]=>
            string(9) "recipe_id"
          }
        }
        ["inverseJoinColumns"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          array(2) {
            ["name"]=>
            string(8) "users_id"
            ["referencedColumnName"]=>
            string(2) "id"
          }
        }
      }
      ["type"]=>
      int(8)
      ["mappedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["isOwningSide"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["sourceEntity"]=>
      string(6) "Recipe"
      ["fetch"]=>
      int(2)
      ["cascade"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
      ["isCascadeRemove"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadePersist"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeRefresh"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeMerge"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeDetach"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["joinTableColumns"]=>
      array(2) {
        [0]=>
        string(16) "recipe_recipe_id"
        [1]=>
        string(8) "users_id"
      }
      ["relationToSourceKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["recipe_recipe_id"]=>
        string(9) "recipe_id"
      }
      ["relationToTargetKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["users_id"]=>
        string(2) "id"
      }
      ["orphanRemoval"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
  }
  ["isIdentifierComposite"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["containsForeignIdentifier"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["idGenerator"]=>
  NULL
  ["sequenceGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["tableGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["changeTrackingPolicy"]=>
  int(1)
  ["isVersioned"]=>
  NULL
  ["versionField"]=>
  NULL
  ["reflClass"]=>
  NULL
  ["isReadOnly"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["namingStrategy":protected]=>
  object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\DefaultNamingStrategy)#258 (0) {
  }
  ["reflFields"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["_prototype":"Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataInfo":private]=>
  NULL
}
object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadata)#476 (36) {
  ["name"]=>
  string(14) "RecipeCategory"
  ["namespace"]=>
  string(0) ""
  ["rootEntityName"]=>
  string(14) "RecipeCategory"
  ["customGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["customRepositoryClassName"]=>
  NULL
  ["isMappedSuperclass"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["parentClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["subClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedNativeQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["sqlResultSetMappings"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["identifier"]=>
  array(1) {
    [0]=>
    string(2) "id"
  }
  ["inheritanceType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["generatorType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["fieldMappings"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["id"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["id"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(2) "id"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(2) "id"
      ["type"]=>
      string(7) "integer"
      ["unsigned"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["name"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(4) "name"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(4) "name"
      ["type"]=>
      string(6) "string"
      ["length"]=>
      int(45)
      ["fixed"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["description"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(11) "description"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(11) "description"
      ["type"]=>
      string(6) "string"
      ["length"]=>
      int(45)
      ["fixed"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(true)
    }
  }
  ["fieldNames"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["id"]=>
    string(2) "id"
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "name"
    ["description"]=>
    string(11) "description"
  }
  ["columnNames"]=>
  array(3) {
    ["id"]=>
    string(2) "id"
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "name"
    ["description"]=>
    string(11) "description"
  }
  ["discriminatorValue"]=>
  NULL
  ["discriminatorMap"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["discriminatorColumn"]=>
  NULL
  ["table"]=>
  array(1) {
    ["name"]=>
    string(15) "recipe_category"
  }
  ["lifecycleCallbacks"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["associationMappings"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["recipe"]=>
    array(19) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(6) "recipe"
      ["targetEntity"]=>
      string(6) "Recipe"
      ["inversedBy"]=>
      string(14) "recipeCategory"
      ["joinTable"]=>
      array(3) {
        ["name"]=>
        string(22) "recipe_category_recipe"
        ["joinColumns"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          array(2) {
            ["name"]=>
            string(18) "recipe_category_id"
            ["referencedColumnName"]=>
            string(2) "id"
          }
        }
        ["inverseJoinColumns"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          array(2) {
            ["name"]=>
            string(9) "recipe_id"
            ["referencedColumnName"]=>
            string(9) "recipe_id"
          }
        }
      }
      ["type"]=>
      int(8)
      ["mappedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["isOwningSide"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["sourceEntity"]=>
      string(14) "RecipeCategory"
      ["fetch"]=>
      int(2)
      ["cascade"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
      ["isCascadeRemove"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadePersist"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeRefresh"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeMerge"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeDetach"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["joinTableColumns"]=>
      array(2) {
        [0]=>
        string(18) "recipe_category_id"
        [1]=>
        string(9) "recipe_id"
      }
      ["relationToSourceKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["recipe_category_id"]=>
        string(2) "id"
      }
      ["relationToTargetKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["recipe_id"]=>
        string(9) "recipe_id"
      }
      ["orphanRemoval"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["parent"]=>
    array(19) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(6) "parent"
      ["targetEntity"]=>
      string(14) "RecipeCategory"
      ["joinColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        [0]=>
        array(2) {
          ["name"]=>
          string(9) "parent_id"
          ["referencedColumnName"]=>
          string(2) "id"
        }
      }
      ["type"]=>
      int(2)
      ["mappedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["inversedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["isOwningSide"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["sourceEntity"]=>
      string(14) "RecipeCategory"
      ["fetch"]=>
      int(2)
      ["cascade"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
      ["isCascadeRemove"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadePersist"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeRefresh"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeMerge"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeDetach"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["sourceToTargetKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["parent_id"]=>
        string(2) "id"
      }
      ["joinColumnFieldNames"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["parent_id"]=>
        string(9) "parent_id"
      }
      ["targetToSourceKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["id"]=>
        string(9) "parent_id"
      }
      ["orphanRemoval"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
  }
  ["isIdentifierComposite"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["containsForeignIdentifier"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["idGenerator"]=>
  NULL
  ["sequenceGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["tableGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["changeTrackingPolicy"]=>
  int(1)
  ["isVersioned"]=>
  NULL
  ["versionField"]=>
  NULL
  ["reflClass"]=>
  NULL
  ["isReadOnly"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["namingStrategy":protected]=>
  object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\DefaultNamingStrategy)#258 (0) {
  }
  ["reflFields"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["_prototype":"Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataInfo":private]=>
  NULL
}
object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadata)#478 (36) {
  ["name"]=>
  string(4) "Step"
  ["namespace"]=>
  string(0) ""
  ["rootEntityName"]=>
  string(4) "Step"
  ["customGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["customRepositoryClassName"]=>
  NULL
  ["isMappedSuperclass"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["parentClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["subClasses"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["namedNativeQueries"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["sqlResultSetMappings"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["identifier"]=>
  array(2) {
    [0]=>
    string(10) "stepNumber"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "recipe"
  }
  ["inheritanceType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["generatorType"]=>
  int(1)
  ["fieldMappings"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["stepNumber"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["id"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(10) "stepNumber"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(11) "step_number"
      ["type"]=>
      string(7) "integer"
      ["unsigned"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
    ["description"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(11) "description"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(11) "description"
      ["type"]=>
      string(4) "text"
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(true)
    }
    ["timer"]=>
    array(5) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(5) "timer"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(5) "timer"
      ["type"]=>
      string(7) "integer"
      ["unsigned"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(true)
    }
    ["image"]=>
    array(6) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(5) "image"
      ["columnName"]=>
      string(5) "image"
      ["type"]=>
      string(6) "string"
      ["length"]=>
      int(100)
      ["fixed"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["nullable"]=>
      bool(true)
    }
  }
  ["fieldNames"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["step_number"]=>
    string(10) "stepNumber"
    ["description"]=>
    string(11) "description"
    ["timer"]=>
    string(5) "timer"
    ["image"]=>
    string(5) "image"
  }
  ["columnNames"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["stepNumber"]=>
    string(11) "step_number"
    ["description"]=>
    string(11) "description"
    ["timer"]=>
    string(5) "timer"
    ["image"]=>
    string(5) "image"
  }
  ["discriminatorValue"]=>
  NULL
  ["discriminatorMap"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["discriminatorColumn"]=>
  NULL
  ["table"]=>
  array(1) {
    ["name"]=>
    string(4) "step"
  }
  ["lifecycleCallbacks"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["associationMappings"]=>
  array(1) {
    ["recipe"]=>
    array(20) {
      ["fieldName"]=>
      string(6) "recipe"
      ["targetEntity"]=>
      string(6) "Recipe"
      ["id"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["joinColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        [0]=>
        array(2) {
          ["name"]=>
          string(9) "recipe_id"
          ["referencedColumnName"]=>
          string(9) "recipe_id"
        }
      }
      ["type"]=>
      int(1)
      ["mappedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["inversedBy"]=>
      NULL
      ["isOwningSide"]=>
      bool(true)
      ["sourceEntity"]=>
      string(4) "Step"
      ["fetch"]=>
      int(2)
      ["cascade"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
      ["isCascadeRemove"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadePersist"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeRefresh"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeMerge"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["isCascadeDetach"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["sourceToTargetKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["recipe_id"]=>
        string(9) "recipe_id"
      }
      ["joinColumnFieldNames"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["recipe_id"]=>
        string(9) "recipe_id"
      }
      ["targetToSourceKeyColumns"]=>
      array(1) {
        ["recipe_id"]=>
        string(9) "recipe_id"
      }
      ["orphanRemoval"]=>
      bool(false)
    }
  }
  ["isIdentifierComposite"]=>
  bool(true)
  ["containsForeignIdentifier"]=>
  bool(true)
  ["idGenerator"]=>
  NULL
  ["sequenceGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["tableGeneratorDefinition"]=>
  NULL
  ["changeTrackingPolicy"]=>
  int(1)
  ["isVersioned"]=>
  NULL
  ["versionField"]=>
  NULL
  ["reflClass"]=>
  NULL
  ["isReadOnly"]=>
  bool(false)
  ["namingStrategy":protected]=>
  object(Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\DefaultNamingStrategy)#258 (0) {
  }
  ["reflFields"]=>
  array(0) {
  }
  ["_prototype":"Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\ClassMetadataInfo":private]=>
  NULL
}
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 09/May/13 ]

Fixed and merged back to 2.3

Comment by Nicholas Van Dusen [ 29/May/13 ]

I tested this again using 2.3.4 (the version which contains this fix) and it is still occurring. Attempting to import mapping for a table with 2 foreign keys in the primary key results in the error "Database does not have any mapping information." Adding a third column on the primary key "fixes" the issue.

Currently our developers are being asked to add a fake third part to the key to work around the issue, then delete that key once they get into the entity class. This is a bit tedious and I'd love to see a fix!

Comment by Nicholas Van Dusen [ 29/May/13 ]

Issue still present in 2.3.4 and 2.4.0-RC1

Comment by Guillermo [ 11/Jun/13 ]

The database engine I use is PostgreSQL. I'm having problems when mapping entities with composite primary keys in other tables.

CREATE TABLE public.establecimiento
    (
      id_establecimiento integer NOT NULL,
      establecimiento character varying(100) NOT NULL,
      CONSTRAINT pk_establecimiento PRIMARY KEY (id_establecimiento )
    )
    WITH (
      OIDS=FALSE
    );
    CREATE TABLE public.establecimiento_sec
    (
      id_establecimiento_sec integer NOT NULL,
      id_establecimiento integer NOT NULL,
      det_seccion character varying(40) NOT NULL,
      plano character varying(100),
      sector_ingreso character varying(254),
      sponsor_imagen_sec character varying(96000),
      CONSTRAINT pk_establecimientos_sec PRIMARY KEY (id_establecimiento_sec , id_establecimiento ),
      CONSTRAINT fk_establec_reference_establec FOREIGN KEY (id_establecimiento)
          REFERENCES public.establecimiento (id_establecimiento) MATCH SIMPLE
          ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE RESTRICT
    )
    WITH (
      OIDS=TRUE
    );
    CREATE TABLE public.establecimiento_sec_plano
    (
      id_establecimiento_sec_plano integer NOT NULL,
      id_establecimiento_sec integer NOT NULL,
      id_establecimiento integer NOT NULL,
      det_plano character varying(512),
      cantidad integer NOT NULL,
      precio double precision,
      insert_charge double precision DEFAULT 0,
      descr character varying(254),
      CONSTRAINT pk_establecimiento_sec_plano PRIMARY KEY (id_establecimiento_sec_plano , id_establecimiento_sec , id_establecimiento ),
      CONSTRAINT fk_establecimiento_sec FOREIGN KEY (id_establecimiento, id_establecimiento_sec)
          REFERENCES public.establecimiento_sec (id_establecimiento, id_establecimiento_sec) MATCH SIMPLE
          ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE CASCADE
    )
    WITH (
      OIDS=FALSE
    );

Defining the entity establecimientoSecPlano, $establecimientoSec variable containing the keys $establecimiento and $id_establecimiento_sec

//Entity/EstablecimientosSecPlano

/**
     * @ORM\Id
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Ticketway\PruebaBundle\Entity\EstablecimientosSec")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns(
     *      @ORM\JoinColumn(name="id_establecimiento_sec", referencedColumnName="id_establecimiento_sec"),
     *      @ORM\JoinColumn(name="id_establecimiento", referencedColumnName="id_establecimiento")) 
     */
    private $establecimientoSec;

//Entity/EstablecimientosSec

/**
     * @ORM\Id
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Ticketway\PruebaBundle\Entity\Establecimientos")
     * @ORM\JoinColumn(name="id_establecimiento", referencedColumnName="id_establecimiento") 
     */
    private $establecimiento;

When executing the command doctrine: mapping: import I get the following error

[Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\MappingException]
It is not possible to map entity 'EstablecimientoSec' with a composite primary key as part of the
primary key of another entity 'EstablecimientoSecPlano#idEstablecimiento'.

Comment by Sam Van der Borght [ 28/Jun/13 ]

We are having the same problem as Guillermo. Any idea on how to fix this issue?
Does anybody know why this problem occurs? I have been looking in the code but havent had much success.

Comment by Diego Antunes [ 01/Jul/13 ]

Doesn't work for me either, composite keys aren't working in 2.3.4

Can we get a fix for this?

Comment by Kamil Adryjanek [ 31/Dec/14 ]

I have similar issue in my current project. Is there any chance to solve this problem in the near future?
Composite primary/foreign keys are important...





[DDC-3711] Error on manyToMany with composite primary key Created: 23/Apr/15  Updated: 23/Apr/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: 2.5
Fix Version/s: 2.4.7
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Marc Pantel Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

symfony 2.6



 Description   

Hi,
I hope that I report in the right place.
I have an issue when I try to create an manyToMany association with an entity with a composite primary key.
The problem is that only one of the two key are create on the association table.

I also have manyToOne association that works fine.

Here are the mapping

Commune.orm.yml

AppDemo\ZoneBundle\Entity\Commune:
    type: entity
    table: ref_commune
    id:
        codeInsee:
            type: string
            nullable: false
            length: 5
            fixed: true
            column: commune_code_insee
        codePostal:
            type: string
            nullable: false
            length: 5
            fixed: true
            column: commune_code_postal
    fields:
        nom:
            type: string
            nullable: false
            length: 100
            fixed: false
            column: commune_nom
    manyToMany:
        zones:
            targetEntity: Zone
            joinTable:
                name: lnk_zone_commune
                joinColumns:
                    commune_code_insee:
                        referencedColumnName: commune_code_insee
                    commune_code_postal:
                        referencedColumnName: commune_code_postal
                inverseJoinColumns:
                    zone_id:
                        referencedColumnName: zone_idx

Zone.orm.yml

AppDemo\ZoneBundle\Entity\Zone:
    type: entity
    repositoryClass: AppDemo\ZoneBundle\Repository\ZoneRepository
    table: ref_zone
    id:
        idx:
            type: integer
            nullable: false
            unsigned: false
            comment: ''
            id: true
            column: zone_idx
            generator:
                strategy: IDENTITY
    fields:
        libelle:
            type: string
            nullable: false
            length: 30
            options:
                default: ''
                comment: 'Libelle de la Zone'


 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 23/Apr/15 ]

What if you simply leave out the joinColumns mappings? Check what comes out of the metadata there, then compare it to your metadata (dump it)

Comment by Marc Pantel [ 23/Apr/15 ]

When I remove the JoinsColumns mapping, I get an error:

Column name `id` referenced for relation from AppBundle\Entity\Commune towards AppBundle\Entity\Zone does not exist.

How do I dump the metadata?





[DDC-3720] Doctrine - Invalid column name 'sclr0' Created: 29/Apr/15  Updated: 25/Jun/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: DQL
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.5.1
Security Level: All

Type: Task Priority: Major
Reporter: Belita Colares Assignee: Guilherme Blanco
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: querybuilder


 Description   

My query doesn't work when i use ->setMaxResult with orderBy SUM.

My dataBase is MSSQL SERVER 2008 R2

$query = $entity->createQueryBuilder('t')
                        ->select('SUM(t.price) AS test')
                        ->setMaxResults(10)
 ->orderBy('test', 'ASC')->getQuery()->getResult();

when i use only
'->select('t.price AS test') ->setMaxResults(10) ->orderBy('test', 'ASC');' doesn't work too

Invalid column name 'sclr0'.
but when i comment this method setMaxResult() my query works fine.

Please help-me, I sorry my english.






[DDC-3828] Spl_object_hash conflict on Merge Created: 15/Jul/15  Updated: 15/Jul/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.5
Fix Version/s: 2.5.1
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Moroine Bentefrit Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: merge, orm, spl_object_hash, unitofwork


 Description   

I have created a PR: https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/1461

Hi,

First of all, this is just a proposal and I'm sure there is a better solution for the problem described here. As this is my first hack into doctrine source code I'm not sure consequences that might be cause by my modification (even all unit tests passes).

I have encounter a problem due to spl_object_hash. I have written a functional test in order to reveal my issue.

The problem is when I merge an entity, here `$user`, UOW keep data on the original entity identified by it's spl_object_hash. Then if I unset this `$user` the spl_object_hash is now available for new object. So I experimented in my case reuse of previous hash which cause a `managed+dirty entity` error.

So I see two solutions

  • UOW keep reference to the entity given as even the given variable is unset there is remaining reference in UOW so the spl_hash will not be released.
  • Do not store data about the given entity, as merge operation isn't supposed to modified given entity.

I tried to implement the second solution as the first may consume a much more memory.

I don't why the merge operation need to do this, so I encapsulated it to prevent unwanted bug






[DDC-2953] ArrayHydrator: Not all items hydrated while orderBy Created: 05/Feb/14  Updated: 18/Aug/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4, 2.4.1
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Critical
Reporter: Mariusz Jaskółka Assignee: Guilherme Blanco
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: array, hydration
Environment:

Linux and Windows, PHP5


Attachments: File ArrayHydrator.php     File Array_Hydrator_4.2.php     File Array_hydrator_4.2_bugfix.php    
Issue Links:
Dependency
depends on DDC-2955 [GH-933] [WIP] DDC-2953 Resolved

 Description   

I will explain the problem using example and pseudo-code:

I have query like that:
SELECT (...) FROM order LEFT JOIN person LEFT JOIN identifier (...) order by (...)

The rows returned by query are following (the order is very important):
order_id|person_id|identifier_id|
12 |21 |33 |
12 |21 |34 |
11 |21 |35 |
11 |21 |33 |
11 |21 |34 |
12 |21 |35 |

After hydration the result is like:
result[0][person][identifier][0][id]=33
result[0][person][identifier][0][id]=34
result[1][person][identifier][0][id]=35
result[1][person][identifier][0][id]=34

But it should be:
result[0][person][identifier][0][id]=33
result[0][person][identifier][0][id]=34
result[0][person][identifier][0][id]=35
result[1][person][identifier][0][id]=35
result[1][person][identifier][0][id]=34
result[1][person][identifier][0][id]=33

The reason is that ArrayHydrator::_identifierMap contains only object id and parents object id. In may example there is difference in parents parent (grandparent) id.



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 05/Feb/14 ]

I've started work on this at https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/933

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 06/Feb/14 ]

This is how I temporary solved the issue, maybe it can help (attachment).

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 06/Feb/14 ]

Mariusz Jaskółka can you provide a diff with current master? This seems to be based off 2.3 or previous versions...

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 06/Feb/14 ]

Version 2.4.2 oryginal file and bugfix

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 06/Feb/14 ]

Oh sorry it is version 2.4.1 (composer downloaded that version for me).
I hope it will be ok.

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 06/Feb/14 ]

Mariusz Jaskółka thanks! I'm trying it right now

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 06/Feb/14 ]

I added one dimention to $this->_identifierMap to be sure that all object's children's keys will be mapped separately.

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 06/Feb/14 ]

Mariusz Jaskółka, I've applied your hotfix at https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/commit/c05921032ff6947daca2d7275031e5cde4700634 and the tests seem to pass on my system and on travis. You may want to check it out and see if it works for your use case.

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 06/Feb/14 ]

It works for my use case correctly. You apparently forgot to remove/comment line 82 which is not necessary now.

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 06/Feb/14 ]

Mariusz Jaskółka fixed, thanks!

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 14/Jul/14 ]

I don't think we'll have a fix for this issue for 2.5, as it will probably require a complete rewrite of the array hydrator

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 14/Jul/14 ]

... and introducing BC breaks.

Comment by Doctrine Bot [ 18/Aug/14 ]

A related Github Pull-Request [GH-933] was closed:
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/933





[DDC-3360] Problem custom name sequeceGenerator YAML for annotatition entities Created: 22/Oct/14  Updated: 29/Oct/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: 2.3.3
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Critical
Reporter: Sandro Cândido de Oliveira Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Hi Benjamin

Problem custom name sequeceGenerator YAML why not create the custom name you want. Being created the default postgres, where is the problem?

Note: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/doctrine-user/7ctTFGWu4mo

Message:

  type: entity
  id:
    id:
      type: integer
      generator:
        strategy: SEQUENCE
      sequenceGenerator:
        sequenceName: message_sq
        allocationSize: 100
        initialValue: 1

The entity is created like this:

namespace message\models\entities;

use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;

/**
 * Message
 *
 * @ORM\Table(name="message")
 * @ORM\Entity
 * @ORM\HasLifecycleCallbacks
 */
class Message
{
    /**
     * @var integer
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="id", type="integer")
     * @ORM\Id
     * @ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="SEQUENCE")
     * @ORM\SequenceGenerator(sequenceName="message_id_seq", allocationSize=1, initialValue=1)
     */

Should be created as specify:

/**
 * Message
 *
 * @ORM\Table(name="message")
 * @ORM\Entity
 * @ORM\HasLifecycleCallbacks
 */
class Message
{
    /**
     * @var integer
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="id", type="integer")
     * @ORM\Id
     * @ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="SEQUENCE")
     * @ORM\SequenceGenerator(sequenceName="message_sq", allocationSize=1, initialValue=1)
     */


 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 22/Oct/14 ]

Is the bug reproducible also in 2.4.6?

Comment by Steve Müller [ 22/Oct/14 ]

Moved to ORM issue tracker. This is not DBAL related.

Comment by Sandro Cândido de Oliveira [ 29/Oct/14 ]

Hi

Is the bug reproducible also in 2.4.6 and 2.5.0-DEV





[DDC-3743] There is a BC break in the ORM 2.5 in the DQL parser Created: 22/May/15  Updated: 28/May/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: DQL
Affects Version/s: 2.5
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Critical
Reporter: Christophe Coevoet Assignee: Guilherme Blanco
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: dql


 Description   

The following DQL query is working fine on 2.4 but breaks on 2.5:

SELECT COUNT(l) FROM Incenteev\WebBundle\Entity\Discussion\Liker l INNER JOIN l.message m INNER JOIN m.thread t WHERE t.space IN (:space_ids) AND l.date >= :from

This is the exception triggered in 2.5:

[Semantical Error] line 0, col 13 near 'l) FROM Incenteev\WebBundle\Entity\Discussion\Liker': Error: Invalid PathExpression. Must be a StateFieldPathExpression. 

The exception happens in Parser->processDeferredPathExpressions.

The Liker class has a compound identifier based on 2 relations.

I suspect it is related to https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/1122



 Comments   
Comment by Christophe Coevoet [ 22/May/15 ]

I'm not sure it is a BC break though. Looking at the SQL generated in 2.4, it was not counting the right thing (is was counting only the message ids, not the combination message id/user id being the primary key.

Comment by Christophe Coevoet [ 28/May/15 ]

Actually, it was counting the right thing when not using DISTINCT (the 2.4 generated SQL was broken for DISTINCT though)

Comment by Guilherme Blanco [ 28/May/15 ]

Yep, that PR was the culript. I can look into this issue later.





[DDC-3441] Unidirectional ManyToOne Not Lazy Loading Created: 09/Dec/14  Updated: 16/Jun/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master, 2.4.6
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Critical
Reporter: Marcus Fulbright Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: lazy-loading, proxy, public-properties, reflection

Issue Links:
Dependency
depends on DDC-3442 [GH-1217] @DDC3441 failing test cases... Open

 Description   

The Unidirectional ManyToOne association described in the docs does not lazy load correctly. The appropriate SQL will get executed, and the returned Proxy does pass type hinting for the correct class. However, the lazy loaded object always has the following properties:

  • _initializer_
  • _cloner_
  • _isInitialized_
  • lazyPropertiesDefaults

Any properties from the class definition do not show up. This is problematic when trying to get reflected properties and their values. Methods are correctly reflected.

Pull request for failing test case



 Comments   
Comment by Marcus Fulbright [ 09/Dec/14 ]

Let me know if anything else is needed.

Comment by Doctrine Bot [ 11/Dec/14 ]

A related Github Pull-Request [GH-1217] was assigned:
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/1217

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 11/Dec/14 ]

Looks like a current ORM limitation (private properties lazy loading).

Related:

Comment by Doctrine Bot [ 24/Jan/15 ]

A related Github Pull-Request [GH-1217] was labeled:
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/1217

Comment by Doctrine Bot [ 24/Jan/15 ]

A related Github Pull-Request [GH-1217] was labeled:
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/1217

Comment by Doctrine Bot [ 16/Jun/15 ]

A related Github Pull-Request [GH-1217] was closed:
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/1217





[DDC-3785] DBAL types are ignored in the ManyToManyPersister Created: 23/Jun/15  Updated: 23/Jun/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.5
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Critical
Reporter: David Adams Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

If you're using custom DBAL types for id's, they are ignored and the value object is passed directly to be bound to the query.

For example, I have an Asset that has many Attributes. My asset's id is an AssetId object. I've created a custom DBAL type for AssetId. Whenever doctrine attempts to cleanse the Asset from orphaned Attributes an exception is thrown:

An exception occurred while executing 'DELETE FROM asset_attributes WHERE asset_id = ?' with params [{}]: Warning: oci_bind_by_name(): Invalid variable used for bind

The ManyToManyPersister::delete() method does not pass along any $types to the Connection::executeUpdate() method. The executeUpdate() method checks if there are types and if there are none, does not pass the params to the _bindTypedValues() method, which I think is the problem. The params(AssetId) get passed directly to the $stmt->execute($params) method call.

I believe the ManyToManyPersister::delete() method needs to look like this. This seems to work.

ManyToManyPersister.php
    /**
     * {@inheritdoc}
     */
    public function delete(PersistentCollection $collection)
    {
        $mapping = $collection->getMapping();

        if ( ! $mapping['isOwningSide']) {
            return; // ignore inverse side
        }
        $types = [];
        $class = $this->em->getClassMetadata($mapping['sourceEntity']);

        foreach ($mapping['joinTable']['joinColumns'] as $joinColumn) {
            $types[] = PersisterHelper::getTypeOfColumn($joinColumn['referencedColumnName'], $class, $this->em);
        }

        $this->conn->executeUpdate($this->getDeleteSQL($collection), $this->getDeleteSQLParameters($collection), $types);
    }





[DDC-3789] Paginator does not convert entity ids if they are value objects Created: 23/Jun/15  Updated: 23/Jun/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.5
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Critical
Reporter: David Adams Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

If an entity uses a custom value object and DBAL type for its id, the value object is used as query parameters instead of the converted value.

Here is where $ids contains an array of value objects. This eventually gets set as parameter for the query here.

This leads to an exception like this:

An exception occurred while executing 'SELECT a0_.id AS ID_0, a0_.created_at AS CREATED_AT_1, a0_.updated_at AS UPDATED_AT_2, a0_.name AS NAME_3, a0_.primary_image_id AS PRIMARY_IMAGE_ID_4, a0_.category_id AS CATEGORY_ID_5, a0_.created_by_id AS CREATED_BY_ID_6 FROM assets a0_ WHERE a0_.created_by_id = ? AND a0_.category_id = ? AND a0_.id IN (?, ?, ?)' with params [\"9369f64a-a978-4c5c-b403-baef2576285f\", \"2f8d4a66-47af-4b14-9a3d-54c1debd084c\", {}, {}, {}]:\n\nWarning: oci_bind_by_name(): Invalid variable used for bind

The 3 empty parameters are how my value objects are being wrongly represented.

I've fixed a similar issue in this pull request but I don't know how to go about fixing this in the Paginator.

One solution could be to only allow value objects for id's if the value object class has a __toString() method and another line gets added after the id objects are retrieved:

Paginator.php
    /**
     * {@inheritdoc}
     */
    public function getIterator()
    {
        // existing code

        $ids = array_map('current', $subQuery->getScalarResult());
        $ids = array_map('strval', $ids);

        // existing code
    }





[DDC-3791] Creating a sequence results in an error using Postgres: sequences' name must be quoted Created: 23/Jun/15  Updated: 23/Jun/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.5
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Critical
Reporter: Marcos Passos Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Postgres' sequences must be quoted. The following snippet results in a error:

$schemaManager->createSequence(new Sequence('123_foo'));

Error:

SQLSTATE[42601]: Syntax error: 7 ERROR: syntax error at or near "123"
LINE 1: CREATE SEQUENCE 123_foo INCREMENT BY 1 MINVALUE 1





[DDC-3535] Allow binding `Parameter` value object to statements, removing the need for explicit value and type passing Created: 24/Jan/15  Updated: 24/Jan/15

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Lazy Loading, ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Task Priority: Critical
Reporter: Marco Pivetta Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: binding, criteria, parameters, persister, repository, type


 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 24/Jan/15 ]

We currently have a lot of locations in the code where we use list($values, $types) = $this->computeParameters(); (pseudo-code).

This leads to a lot of code duplication and complexity.

Maybe a Parameter VO may be used instead, or a ParameterCollection with a fixed $types and a mutable $values, and with minimal internal validation.





[DDC-3083] Persist/Flush silently fails when CTI is applied on an existing table Created: 12/Apr/14  Updated: 13/Apr/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.4.2
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Frank Liepert Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Given an existing table (= parent table) the integration of a new parent-child relationship with Class Table Inheritance (CTI) leads to a update problem.

First of all a child table is created with a foreign key to the parent table. Next, the discriminator column is added to the parent table. The discriminator map will be auto-generated.

The problem arises when trying to perform persist() and flush() on a child entity. Initially the child table is logically empty. However, the UnitOfWork triggers updateTable() which will fail since there is nothing to update. Instead, an upsert should be performed.

Another sneaky thing is that the repository will return the child class with the updated data after calling flush() on the same request. On the next request the child class is returned with the data loaded from the persister. Of course, the updated data is missing.



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 13/Apr/14 ]

Frank Liepert do I understand this correctly if I say that you are trying to (pseudo) upcast an entity to a more specific subtype? That is unsupported by the ORM. Could you make just an example snippet of what you described in the issue?

Comment by Frank Liepert [ 13/Apr/14 ]

Marco Pivetta: You have understood really well. If you say that's not supported by the ORM then this is the answer. Still I think that upsert could solve solve the "problem" and I know that there are/have been discussions about upsert.

Right now I will continue to manually insert the missing rows in the child table. After this necessary step the ORM works as expected.

Nevertheless the real bug is that after persist() and flush() the entity manager returns the child object with the "persisted" data of the child table although there are in fact no rows in the child table.

$parentRepository = $em->getRepository('Parent');

$child = $parentRepository ->find(1);
$child->setChildPropertyA('foo');

$em->persist($child);
$em->flush();

$child = $parentRepository ->find(1);
var_dump($child->getChildPropertyA());
// string(3) "foo"

// But: There is no 'foo' in the child table!


/** 
 * NEW REQUEST
 */

$parentRepository = $em->getRepository('Parent');

$child = $parentRepository ->find(1);
var_dump($child->getChildPropertyA());
// NULL

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 13/Apr/14 ]

Frank Liepert why are $child in the first request and $child in the second request different here? Are you manually changing the data at SQL level?

Comment by Frank Liepert [ 13/Apr/14 ]

Marco Pivetta as I have explained the persist() and flush() in the first request trigger an UPDATE command (Because there is already a row in the parent table?). Given that the child table was manually created before there are no rows on that table at that time and therefore nothing can be updated. Nevertheless the ORM triggers no error and $child looks like having been persisted. In the second request you'll notice that there haven't been persisted any of the data belonging to the child table.





[DDC-2983] TCI association not getting hydrated into sql statement Created: 14/Feb/14  Updated: 23/Mar/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.5
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Machete Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: orm
Environment:

MySQL, using DoctrineORMModule (zf2 integration)



 Description   

/**
 * @ORM\Entity
 * @ORM\Table(name="base")
 * @ORM\InheritanceType("JOINED")
 * @ORM\DiscriminatorColumn(name="discriminator", type="string")
 * @ORM\DiscriminatorMap({
 * "a" = "A",
 * "b" = "B",
 * })
 */
class Base
{
    /**
     * @ORM\Id
     * @ORM\Column(type="integer")
     * @ORM\GeneratedValue(strategy="AUTO")
     */
    protected $id;
}

/**
 * @ORM\Entity
**/
class A extends Base {
    /**
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="B", inversedBy="as")
     */
    protected $b;

    /**
     * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="C", cascade={"persist"})
     */
    protected $cs;
}

/**
 * @ORM\Entity
**/
class B Extends Base {
    /**
     * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="A", mappedBy="b")
     */
    protected $as;
}

/**
 * @ORM\Entity
**/
class C {
  // ...
}

Doing this:

$a = new A();
$b = new B();

$a->setB($b);
$b->addA($a);

var_dump($a->getB()); // outputs B (b not null!)
var_dump($b->getAs()) // outputs A (private $_elements => [0] class B)

$em->persist($a);
$em->persist($b);
$em->flush();

Leads to

integrity constraint violation, b_id can not be null

aka

INSERT INTO a (id, b_id), (123, null);

I have no idea why this happens. This works:

$a = new A();
$b = new B();

$a->setB($b);
$b->addA($a);

var_dump($a->getB()); // outputs B (b not null!)
var_dump($b->getAs()) // outputs A (private $_elements => [0] class B)

$em->persist($a);
$em->flush();
$em->persist($b);
$em->flush();


 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 23/Mar/14 ]

This most likely happens because the UnitOfWork tries to set the owner and reverse incorrectly due to an ordering issue.





[DDC-2954] Paginator loses items Created: 05/Feb/14  Updated: 12/Feb/14

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4, 2.4.1
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Mariusz Jaskółka Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: Pagination, Paginator
Environment:

Linux and Windows, PHP 5, Oracle(OCI8)


Attachments: File LimitSubqueryOutputWalker.php     File LimitSubqueryOutputWalker_bugfix.php    

 Description   

Sometimes when when I use Paginator (Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Pagination\Paginator)

  • with query contains orderBy
  • with $fetchJoinCollection = true
  • lot of joins with toMany associations

there are too few items in result (no, it is not the end of list). There two situations:
1. I have four items on page 1 and two items on page 2 (pageLimit is 5). It is no so bad
2. I have four items on page 1 and there is no page 2 (while there should be 5 all items). This is very bad because I lose one item.

------------------------------------------------------------------
EDIT:
In function Paginator::getIterator there is variable $ids. In my situation it contains five numbers [34,26,34,15,12]. There is duplicated value 34 but ids of top-level entities should be distinct (as far as we do not use CROSS JOIN, or maybe I am wrong).

The Paginator::count function works correctly, it does not count duplicated values twice.

Statement that gets $ids is like following:
SELECT a.* FROM (SELECT DISTINCT ID2, BEGINTIME70 FROM (...) dctrn_result ORDER BY BEGINTIME70 DESC) a WHERE ROWNUM <= 5

------------------------------------------------------------------
EDIT 2 - Bugfix description:
The result items of the query is not unique because of
"SELECT DISTINCT col_with_id, order_by_column (...) ORDER BY order_by_column".
If we had items like following:
(1,A)
(1,B)
(1,B)
(2,C)

After DISTINCT operation the result would be:
(1,A)
(1,B)
(2,C)

But we want to have unique firs column, not pairs. That's why we should do "ORDER BY" before "DISTINCT" - not in the same time.
Please confirm if the solution is correct.



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 05/Feb/14 ]

Mariusz Jaskółka this needs more details

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 06/Feb/14 ]

OK, I will try to find out where the problem is.

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 06/Feb/14 ]

I have edited description, maybe additional information will help.

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 07/Feb/14 ]

I send the bugfix in attachment. I will describe it soon.

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 07/Feb/14 ]

Bugfix version 2 - previously I did not notice that oracle loses order after DISTINCT operation. Thus I used GROUP BY.

Comment by Mariusz Jaskółka [ 11/Feb/14 ]

I do not know if I can change status of this issue from "Awaiting Feedback". I can not see such option





[DDC-2918] get statements from ORM Created: 15/Jan/14  Updated: 15/Jan/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Flip Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

When doing `persist()` and then `flush()` the statements are not accessible anymore after the operation is done.

The EntityManager uses an EntityPersister. When looking at the BasicEntityPersister->executeInserts() a new statement is created but it's not saved as part of another object.
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/master/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Persisters/BasicEntityPersister.php#L260

Benefit:
When having access to the statements afterwards, all the following methods would be available:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/class.pdostatement.php

Most interesting are rowCount and error related methods.



 Comments   
Comment by Steve Müller [ 15/Jan/14 ]

Flip AFAIK you can use an SQL Logger for this which has to be set in the connection. The ORM testsuite makes use of this, too. See this example: https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/master/tests/Doctrine/Tests/ORM/Functional/OneToOneEagerLoadingTest.php#L155

Comment by Flip [ 15/Jan/14 ]

Yes sure, but using a logger will be a strange way to pipe it back into business logic.

For example it's possible to do remove() on a proxy so you don't know if the row was present or not.

or another situation ..

when dealing with concurrency .. somebody else might have deleted the row already ..





[DDC-2891] Impossible to pass a limit to a subquery Created: 07/Jan/14  Updated: 08/Jan/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.4.2
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: alex Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

It seems that passing the limit to a subquery is not working

 
$subquery = $em->createQueryBuilder()->from('...')->where('...')->setMaxResults(5);
$query = $em->createQueryBuilder()->from('...')->where(
   $qb->expr()->in('p.id', $subquery->getDQL())
);
$query->getQuery()->getResult();

The query works but the is no specified limit in the resulting SQL.
I am aware that DQL does not support the limits and offsets, so i guess there should be another way to get this working?



 Comments   
Comment by Steve Müller [ 08/Jan/14 ]

Can you please tell which database platform you are using? Because limiting results heavily depends on the platform used.

Comment by alex [ 08/Jan/14 ]

MySql

Comment by Steve Müller [ 08/Jan/14 ]

Hmmm I am not quite sure if the limit/offset is invoked for subqueries but I don't see why it shouldn't. Also I think this is not a DBAL issue because the limit/offset support for MySQL is the easiest we have on all platform. See: https://github.com/doctrine/dbal/blob/master/lib/Doctrine/DBAL/Platforms/MySqlPlatform.php#L51-L63
The query doesn't have to be modified but instead only the limit clause is appended to the query. Can you maybe provide the generated SQL for that query?

Comment by alex [ 08/Jan/14 ]

I think if you try to build any query with QueryBuilder, set a limit to it with setMaxResults then call getDQL method, you should see that the output contains no info about limit.
So if you look at my code example , at $qb->expr()>in('p.id', $subquery>getDQL()), then you will see that the getDQL passes to the IN expression a query which already DOES NOT have limit. So this is the place where any info about limits and offsets gets lost.

So I fail to see what it has to do with any specific db engine,however I can provide the mysql resulting query if you want,though it looked perfectly normal to me,just lacks the LIMIT part.





[DDC-2870] Doctrine error when using SUM(a.id=1) as `ìdentifier`: Expected Doctrine\ORM\Query\Lexer::T_CLOSE_PARENTHESIS, got '=' Created: 22/Dec/13  Updated: 06/Jan/14

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: DQL
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Maxim Geerinck Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: dql
Environment:

Symfony2 bundle



 Description   

Doctrine error when using SUM(a.id=1) as `ìdentifier`: Expected Doctrine\ORM\Query\Lexer::T_CLOSE_PARENTHESIS, got '='

I am trying to execute a query in doctrine that contains something like this

SUM(a.id = 1) as `1`
for some reasons it always gives me the following error:

[Syntax Error] line 0, col 15: Error: Expected Doctrine\ORM\Query\Lexer::T_CLOSE_PARENTHESIS, got '='
This is the code i am using

$result = $em->getRepository('MyBundle:PlayerAction')
->createQueryBuilder('pa')
->select(array(
'SUM(a.id=1) as `1`,
SUM(a.id=2) as `2`,
SUM(a.id=3) as `3`,
p.playerName,
pa.timestamp'
))
->innerJoin('pa.action', 'a')
->innerJoin('pa.player', 'p')
->where('pa.timestamp > ?1')
->groupBy('p')
->setParameter(1, time() - $time)
->orderBy('p.playerName', 'ASC');






[DDC-2851] Allow set custom collection initializer at runtime Created: 12/Dec/13  Updated: 12/Dec/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.4.1
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Konstantin Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Use case: Company, Category, CompanyCategory entities. We are loading set of companies and should initialize Company.companyCategories collection with joined categories, which ordered by Company.title.

I cann't do it via Criteria API, it doesn't supports joins. + I should return same PersistentCollection instance (Company.companyCategories used in Symfony2 forms).

Current workaround:

    public function loadCompanyCategoriesCollectionForCompany(Company $company)
    {
        $companyCategories = $this->_em->createQueryBuilder()
            ->select('cc')
            ->from('OloloCompaniesBundle:CompanyCategory', 'cc')
            ->join('cc.category', 'c')
            ->addSelect('c')
            ->orderBy('c.title')
            ->where('cc.company = :company')
            ->setParameter('company', $company)
            ->getQuery()
            ->getResult()
        ;

        $coll = $company->getCompanyCategories();
        foreach ($companyCategories as $companyCategory) { /* @var $coll \Doctrine\ORM\PersistentCollection */
            $coll->hydrateAdd($companyCategory);
        }
        $coll->setInitialized(true);
    }

What would be nice: native API for setting custom initializers.






[DDC-2852] Enclose subquery with parenthesis in from clause (QueryBuilder) Created: 12/Dec/13  Updated: 12/Dec/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Matthieu Pécro Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: from, orm, parenthesis, querybuilder,, subquery


 Description   

Hi

In QueryBuilder from clause, when argument is a QueryBuilder (not a string like a table), there are not parenthesis enclosure on the subquery.

Ex:
$subqb->select('myfield')->from('mytable');
$qb->from($sub, 'myalias)

DQL is : SELECT myfield FROM SELECT myField FROM mytable myalias. This is not working on MySQL.

It should be : SELECT myfield FROM (SELECT myField FROM mytable) myalias.



 Comments   
Comment by Christophe Coevoet [ 12/Dec/13 ]

I don't understand your statement This is not working on MySQL. after giving a DQL statement. MySQL does not support any DQL. It runs SQL.

And DQL does not support using a subselect in the FROM clause





[DDC-2841] Preload data for association Created: 06/Dec/13  Updated: 06/Dec/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Przemyslaw Wrobel Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Consider two classes User and Address with one-to-many association.
I would like to preload addresses for given user object so that it will be accessible via getter method like this:

1. $user = $userRepository->find($userId);
2. load some of the addresses but not all
3. $user->getAddresses() should return those loaded in step 2

Currently the only solution for step 2 I found working is to write a DQL like this:
SELECT u, a
FROM User
INNER JOIN u.addresses a
WHERE u = :user AND a.foo = 1

When the data is hydrated it is assigned to the user object and thus accessible with $user->getAddresses (which normally would return all the addresess not only those with foo set)

The only problem is that the query in step 2 unnecessarily fetches all user data that was already fetched in step 1






[DDC-2816] New event: pre-execute query Created: 25/Nov/13  Updated: 25/Nov/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Artur Eshenbrener Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

It would be useful to fire event just before each query executes. Listeners can set hints to query, for instance.






[DDC-2787] COALESCE() doesn't work with NOT IN() Created: 09/Nov/13  Updated: 09/Nov/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: DQL
Affects Version/s: 2.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: flack Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

When I try running the following query:

SELECT count(c.id) FROM my\model c WHERE COALESCE(c.up, 0) NOT IN( :parent_ids)

I get

Doctrine\ORM\Query\QueryException: [Semantical Error] line 0, col 118 near 'up, 0) NOT IN(': Error: Invalid PathExpression. Must be a StateFieldPathExpression.

When I run the query as straight SQL against the database, it works as expected. Is this something that can be fixed in Doctrine or is this syntax unsupported?






[DDC-2733] DefaultQuoteStrategy BUG on Oracle Created: 10/Oct/13  Updated: 26/Oct/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers, ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Pablo Santiago Sánchez Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

Symfony on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac)
Oracle 11g



 Description   

There's a bug on the DefaultQuoteStrategy when used with Oracle. The getColumnAlias created an invalid alias.

The name of the column had 31 chars, with _ being the 3rd. Column was 101 on the query. Resulting name of the alias started with _, which is invalid name for Oracle.

Example:
CO_SEQ_NOMEGIGANTEPRAKCTMEUDEUS

Alias formed was
_SEQ_NOMEGIGANTEPRAKCTMEUDEUS101

HOW TO FIX:
replace the regex on line 135:
original:
$columnName = preg_replace('/[^A-Za-z0-9_]/', '', $columnName);
fixed:
$columnName = preg_replace('/[^A-Za-z0-9]/', '', $columnName);



 Comments   
Comment by Rudi Uhrig Neto [ 16/Oct/13 ]

Hi there!

I would like to do a contribuition for this issue! I'm not safe with my sugestion, but someone can be helped!

I'm working with 2.4.0 Doctrine Version and I'm facing the same problem, "invalid character" due the function that make a cut off from the begining from alias.

My sugestion to solve this problem is maintain the separator '_' between alias name, but cutting off from the ending alias and reserv the lenght to the counter.

See bellow my modification code at DefaultQuoteStrategy::getColumnAlias() line 130, just replace all lines from function by these below:

DefaultQuoteStrategy.php
public function getColumnAlias($columnName, $counter, AbstractPlatform $platform, ClassMetadata $class = null)
{
    // 1 ) Trim the column alias to the maximum identifier length of the platform.
    //     If the alias is to long, characters are cut off from the ending subtracting the chars reserved to counter.
    // 2 ) Concatenate column name and counter
    // 3 ) Strip non alphanumeric characters
    // 4 ) Prefix with "_" if the result its numeric
    $columnName = substr($columnName, 0, $platform->getMaxIdentifierLength() - strlen($counter));
    $columnName = $columnName . $counter;
    $columnName = preg_replace('/[^A-Za-z0-9_]/', '', $columnName);
    $columnName = is_numeric($columnName) ? '_' . $columnName : $columnName;
      
    return $platform->getSQLResultCasing($columnName);
}

What do you guys think?

Comment by Pablo Santiago Sánchez [ 16/Oct/13 ]

Rudi, prefixing it with _ would keep the problem on Oracle. Since that name is for aliasing pourposes only, the _ char is useless.

I just remembered another possible situation: fields should not start with numbers!

Comment by Rudi Uhrig Neto [ 16/Oct/13 ]

Pablo,

The changes in my sugestion code don't consider the prefix '_', indepedent of the characteres in alias column name, the function will remove the last characteres from alias... see an example with column name DT_VERIFICACAO_SITUACAO_ACESSO.

The current code create a sql:
DT_VERIFICACAO_SITUACAO_ACESSO AS _VERIFICACAO_SITUACAO_ACESSO23,

My sugestion will produce:
DT_VERIFICACAO_SITUACAO_ACESSO AS DT_VERIFICACAO_SITUACAO_ACES23,

Comment by Pablo Santiago Sánchez [ 18/Oct/13 ]

Oh, sorry, my mistake. Your solution sounds better.

Since there's still no solution from the Doctrine Team, I'm iusing my own QuoteStrategy. Hope this bug gets fixed soon.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 26/Oct/13 ]

Fabio B. Silva Can you comment on Rudi Uhrig Neto solution? Its easily changed, but I am wondering if this is backwards compatible. I would want to merge the fix back to 2.3 and 2.4. Branch is ready to be committed for me locally.





[DDC-2744] Inheritance - Empty value for discriminatorColumn in query Created: 16/Oct/13  Updated: 16/Oct/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Daniel Dos Prazeres Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Hello, I have an inheritance problem with the following classes

<?php

namespace Proj\Bundle\MyBundle\Entity;

use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;
use Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraints as Assert;

/**
 * ClassTop
 *
 * @ORM\Table()
 * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="Proj\Bundle\MyBundle\Repository\ClassTopRepository")
 * @ORM\InheritanceType("SINGLE_TABLE")
 * @ORM\DiscriminatorColumn(name="aVal", type="string")
 * @ORM\DiscriminatorMap({ "ValOne" = "ClassSubOne", "ValTwo" = "ClassSubTwo", "ValThree" = "ClassSubThree" })
 * 
 */
class ClassTop
{
    .....
}

class ClassSubOne extends ClassTop
{
    ....
}

class ClassSubTwo extends ClassTop
{
    ....
}

class ClassSubThree extends ClassTop
{
    ....
}

When i call findAll method my query is not correct

$entityManager->getRepository('ProjMyBundle:ClassSubOne')->findAll()

the query builded

SELECT field, field2 FROM CLASSTOP WHERE AVAL IN () 

The value for the discriminator column is not passed

Thanks for your help






[DDC-2742] 2 ManyToMany relations to the same target entity make the schema update fail by default Created: 15/Oct/13  Updated: 15/Oct/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers, Tools
Affects Version/s: 2.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Christophe Coevoet Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: mapping, schematool


 Description   

At some point in the Doctrine releases (I don't remember which version it was), the default naming of the join table of a ManyToMany relation changed from using the property name to using the name of the target entity.

This makes it impossible to use multiple ManyToMany relations to the same target entity in a class without naming join tables explicitly. A SchemaException is thrown by the SchemaTool when trying to update the schema.

Note that this issue is not caught by the SchemaValidator. It will display us that the mapping files are correct (before throwing the above exception in the second step when trying to compare it to the existing database)






pager produces wrong results on postgresql (DDC-1958)

[DDC-2729] Same bug affects SQLServer2008Platform Created: 07/Oct/13  Updated: 07/Oct/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Tools
Affects Version/s: 2.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Sub-task Priority: Major
Reporter: Rafi Adnan Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: paginator
Environment:

SQL Server 10.50.1617
unixODBC 2.2.14
PHP 5.4.19



 Description   

If the class is patched with the following:

if ($this->platform instanceof SQLServer2008Platform)

{ $this->preserveSqlOrdering($AST, $sqlIdentifier, $innerSql, $sql); }

It fixes the issue.






[DDC-2746] When generating DQL query entities with "Class Table Inheritance" is a SQL generated inconsistent Created: 16/Oct/13  Updated: 18/Oct/13

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: DQL
Affects Version/s: 2.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Hugo Henrique Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None

Attachments: File DDC2746Test.php     File DDC2746Test_original.php    

 Description   

When I run the query DQL involving entities "Class Table Inheritance" is a SQL generated inconsistent see this gist: https://gist.github.com/hugohenrique/b322e8d998c870265177



 Comments   
Comment by Hugo Henrique [ 17/Oct/13 ]

An example of incoherent generation of SQL:
https://gist.github.com/hugohenrique/b322e8d998c870265177





[DDC-2709] Defining Columns as "Updatable" or "Insertable" Created: 27/Sep/13  Updated: 27/Sep/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Martin Prebio Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

With Hibernate I can define a column as Updatable/Insertable or non-Updatable/non-Insertable so that this field is considered read-only and is not part of any update/insert statement. I'd like to have the same possibility in Doctrine.

In my use case a value is generated and maintained by database triggers. In my application I only want to read this value but the application should never try to insert or update the column.

Updatable/Insertable in the Hibernate documentation: http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/annotations/3.5/reference/en/html_single/#entity-mapping-property-column






[DDC-2691] Test Suite: Drop other connections before dropping database PostgreSQL Created: 19/Sep/13  Updated: 19/Sep/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Flip Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

Windows 7 Professional 64 bits
PHP 5.4.11 (cli) (built: Jan 16 2013 20:26:26)
Doctrine dev-master from 18-9-2013
PostgreSQL 9.2.4 build 1600, 64-bits



 Description   

The test suite is trying to run the command

DROP DATABASE doctrine_tests

This fails, together with lots of tests when another user is connected (for example through the pgAdmin program). It would be nice if the test suite had an option to drop existing connections, which can be done with the following command:

SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE datname = 'doctrine_tests';





[DDC-2697] ObjectHydrator::hydrateRowData fails to hydrate first fetch joined entity Created: 20/Sep/13  Updated: 06/Dec/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3, 2.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Austin Morris Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: orm
Environment:

All



 Description   

Let's say I have accounts, contacts, and contact types. Any given contact can have be any kind of contact type to any account. This is all managed through an account_contacts table with a 3-way composite PK of the contact_id, account_id, and type_id.

All of this translates to 4 entities, the account, contact, type, and accountContact entity. The id of the accountContact entity is the three other entities which is holds.

When I use query builder to retrieve the accountContacts based on some condition, and also fetch join contacts, accounts, and types so that they are eagerly loaded, the ObjectHydrator fails to load the first accountContact returned.

This is because the first time through hydrateRowData, the fetch joined entities are hydrated first. The problem is $this->_rsm->parentAliasMap[$dqlAlias] does not contain an entry for the accountContact (root entity). Not until an accountContact is hydrated does that get set. In the mean time, the other three entities were set to null because there is no parent alias yet (in version 2.4, this is line 405.

Subsequent loops through hydrateRowData work because by this time the parent alias is set. But that first row returned is always an accountContact containing three null objects.



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 26/Oct/13 ]

Austin Morris Can you show the QueryBuilder select clause you are using? Have you tried sorting the accountContacts first?

$qb->select('accountContacts, contact, account, type')

This way it should definately work, and then there is also some attempts to resort this way if you dont have that, but its not always working.

Comment by Austin Morris [ 06/Dec/13 ]

Sorry, I don't have the original select clause. I ended up doing something different and can't seem to find my original code.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 06/Dec/13 ]

I have another person that reported a simliiar bug with reproducable test case. I hope to investigate this very soon.





[DDC-2694] Hydrating with entities with the NEW operator Created: 19/Sep/13  Updated: 21/Jan/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Flip Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 3
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
is duplicated by DDC-2899 Allow the NEW operator to construct o... Resolved

 Description   

It would be nice if the new function accepted objects as parameters, like this:

new Country(country, some_extra_stuff)

Alternatively another keyword could be introduced that constructs the object with the parameter and afterwards hydrates it.






[DDC-2672] Using fetchAll() in Hydration can improve TCP Wait Created: 11/Sep/13  Updated: 13/Dec/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Hydration currently fetches the rows and hydrates them by interleaving both operations. This can cause an increased TCP wait time, because the PHP processing takes a bit of time.

We should investigate weather changing to fetchAll() improves the overall performance.

Ping Thomas RabaixGuilherme Blanco



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 13/Dec/13 ]

We can introduce a new query hint to allow us to support both: 'DBAL_FETCH_ALL'. If that is set, use fetchAll(), otherwise fetchRow().





[DDC-2659] Notice: Undefined index: sourceToTargetKeyColumns in /doctrine/orm/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Persisters/BasicEntityPersister .php line 1180 Created: 08/Sep/13  Updated: 08/Sep/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Taylor Kaplan Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: orm
Environment:

Symfony2 With PHP 5.5 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS using Apache 2


Attachments: File Client.php     File ClientFixtures.php     File User.php     File UserFixtures.php    

 Description   

I am getting this error:

 Notice: Undefined index: sourceToTargetKeyColumns

When I try to load my data fixture. There are two ordered fixtures that I'm dealing with: Clients and Users. The client datafixture looks like:

    	/**
    	 * {@inheritDoc}
    	 */
    	 public function load(ObjectManager $manager)
    	 {
    
    		for($index = 0; $index < 224; $index ++)
    		{
    			$client = new Client();
    			$manager->persist($client);
                        $this->addReference($index . 'Client', $client);
    		}
    
    		$manager->flush();
    		$manager->clear();
    	 }
    
    	 public function getOrder()
    	 {
    	 	return 0;
    	 }

While the user data fixture looks like:

     $user = New User();
     $client = $this->getReference($index . 'Client');

     // This line is causing the problem
     $client->setUser($user);

For whatever reason, I don't seem to be having issues with any of my other fixtures. Just this one. I've doubled check the entity relationships which are shown bellow.

My Client.php entity:

    /**
     * @ORM\ OneToOne(targetEntity="User", mappedBy="clientAccount")
     */
    protected $user;

My User.php entity:

    /**
     * @ORM\ OneToOne(targetEntity="Client", inversedBy="user")
     */
    protected $clientAccount;

There seems to be a bug with the return value of getAssociationMapping() for special conditions when implemented in BasicEntityPersister. The files for my fixtures and entities for this project have been attached.






[DDC-2671] YAML mapping: entity generation with inheritance does work Created: 11/Sep/13  Updated: 11/Sep/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: 2.4.1
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Peter Tulala Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: inheritance, mapping, yaml


 Description   

Entities inherited from parent entities should be defined as class Foo extends Bar. However YAML driver ignores inheritance hierarchy and does not use "extends" keyword at all.






[DDC-2649] Hydration in bidirectional, OneToOne relationship, PK as FK for owning side, is problematic Created: 04/Sep/13  Updated: 04/Sep/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Jérôme Viveret Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: FK, OneToOne, PK, bidirectional


 Description   

I am referring to this situation https://gist.github.com/anonymous/6435032

The following problem occur:

When using HardCover as the root entity of a query, the ObjectHydrator fails to properly register the first [HardCover of the resultset]'s Book. Only the first. The following HardCover have their Books correctly linked. The inverse situation (using Book as the root entity) works fine.

When some other entity (say WoodenPart) is linked to HardCover via a ManyToOne association, using WoodenPart as a query root results in no WoodenPart have their HardCover registered.






[DDC-2642] GROUP BY with inherited entity (which is also in SELECT clause) does not list columns from inheriting entities Created: 30/Aug/13  Updated: 30/Aug/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: DQL, ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Ondřej Mirtes Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

PostgreSQL



 Description   

The summary pretty much sums it up.

Code example: https://gist.github.com/ondrejmirtes/6388434






[DDC-2637] [GH-769] Add Custom Persisters Created: 28/Aug/13  Updated: 15/Apr/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Doctrine Bot Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None

Issue Links:
Duplicate
is duplicated by DDC-2629 [GH-768] DDC-391: Add support to conf... Resolved
Reference
relates to DDC-391 Allow to specifiy custom Entity and C... In Progress

 Description   

This issue is created automatically through a Github pull request on behalf of guilhermeblanco:

Url: https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/769

Message:

Adding support for custom persisters as defined by DDC-391.
Implementing both Entity and Collection based Persisters



 Comments   
Comment by Doctrine Bot [ 02/Jan/14 ]

A related Github Pull-Request [GH-768] was closed:
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/768

Comment by Doctrine Bot [ 15/Apr/14 ]

A related Github Pull-Request [GH-769] was closed:
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/769





[DDC-2635] Problems with Filtering SQL Queries based on schema Created: 27/Aug/13  Updated: 27/Aug/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

The filtering in Schema Tool based on current database schema is not extendable very easily. We need a way to allow creating all, or only a subset of schemas in both supporting and non supporting databases.






[DDC-2631] Replacing object in a OneToOne with OrphanRemoval=true isn't working as expected Created: 23/Aug/13  Updated: 26/Nov/13

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Felipe Guaycuru Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: orm
Environment:

PHP 5.4



 Description   

So I have a class defined like this:

class PhoneSettings {
[...]

/**

  • @OneToOne(targetEntity="Medium", cascade= {"persist", "remove"}

    , orphanRemoval=true)

  • @JoinColumn(name="medium_id", referencedColumnName="medium_id", nullable=true, onDelete="SET NULL")
    **/
    protected $medium = null;

[...]
}
And class Medium has no reference to the class Settings.

Now suppose I have a $Settings object that is already persisted and has been correctly loaded. Also suppose that the $Settings object has a $medium (that is, $Settings->medium = $OldMedium)

Now suppose I do:

$Settings->medium = $NewMedium;
Where $NewMedium is a different Medium object.

When I persist $Settings, Doctrine does delete $OldMedium from the DB, but the problem is that it also deletes $NewMedium ...

I have tried removing onDelete="SET NULL", but then I receive a "cannot delete, constraint failed" error...






[DDC-2630] Filters with joined inheritance Created: 22/Aug/13  Updated: 09/Jan/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Florian Vilpoix Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: inheritance, sql-walker, sqlfilter


 Description   

Hello,

I'm trying to use SQLFilter with a Joined Inheritance, and the sql Walker never applies filters on the sub-class, even if I make my SELECT on the sub-class or the root.

In the SqlWalker, the methods 'generateFilterConditionSQL' says :

// The classes in the inheritance will be added to the query one by one,
// but only the root node is getting filtered

I don't understand why, and I would like to know if there is any way to apply filters to subclasses in joined-inheritance.

Thanks a lot



 Comments   
Comment by Menno Holtkamp [ 09/Jan/14 ]

Are you sure you apply the filter on the root Entity? This discussion might be usefull:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/doctrine-user/e1cPZOorfaQ





[DDC-2617] OneToMany annotation should not work with MappedSuperclass Created: 18/Aug/13  Updated: 08/Sep/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Mapping Drivers
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: jonathan bensaid Assignee: Fabio B. Silva
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Using annotations in my model mapped to "mapped superclass" I can use one to many relations et every bidirectional relation I want.
Using yaml or xml it suddenly doesn't work and throw me an error. Annotations should work the same way and should not authorize one to many or any bidirectional relation.



 Comments   
Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 08/Sep/13 ]

Its actually the other way around, yml and xml need to allow this, because it works with association overrides.

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 08/Sep/13 ]

Assigning Fabio





[DDC-2605] Console command generates entity stubs that break type hinting contracts. Created: 09/Aug/13  Updated: 12/Aug/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Tools
Affects Version/s: 2.3
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Alex Parker Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: cli, orm, stubs, tools, type-hinting
Environment:

Debian Linux (crunchbang)
PHP 5.4.4-14+deb7u2 (cli)
MySQL Server version: 5.5.31-0+wheezy1 (Debian)


Attachments: PNG File thcontract.png    

 Description   

I've found that the doctrine cli tool seems to break PHP's type hinting contracts in the scenario outlined in the attached diagram, following a process outlined in my stack overflow post here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18098552/using-symfony-2-cli-tools-how-can-i-generate-getters-and-setters-with-correct-t

The result is code that throws E_STRICT notices which we are loathe to suppress for CI reasons, e.g: Runtime Notice: Declaration of ... should be compatible with ... in ... line ...

As mentioned I have asked on Stack Overflow to no avail, as well as the FreeNode IRC channels starting with #symfony. The response from #symfony is that this is a doctrine issue, with suggestions being made that my problem is that I am using the CLI tools.

I don't think it would be too difficult to fix this issue. I had a quick look at the Doctrine\ORM\Tools\EntityGenerator class and Doctrine\ORM\Tools\Console\Command\GenerateEntitiesCommand and it looks like it should be possible to find the eldest ancestor definition of a function and honour its type hints.

I am open to this being an implementation issue on my end, but I do feel this may be either a bug or an opportunity to improve the CLI tools as for most other purposes they have been a huge benefit to automating my workflow.

Thanks for your time and consideration.






[DDC-2590] Class inheritance - left join between child and parent entities Created: 06/Aug/13  Updated: 25/Mar/14

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 2.3.3, 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Tomáš Ďuračka Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: inheritance, joins, orm, sql-walker


 Description   

The piece of code given under creates wrong sql to me.

Module is parent entity for BusinessModule entity. Category is joined with BusinessModule.

Module entity is only left joined to its child entity and that's the problem because it contains a field "name" used for filtering. So even if there is no module having the name, categories are still included.

I need the parent entity to be inner joined to child entity not left joined.

File doctrine2/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Query/SqlWalker.php line 353:

// If this is a joined association we must use left joins to preserve the correct result.
$sql .= isset($this->queryComponents[$dqlAlias]['relation']) ? ' LEFT ' : ' INNER ';
$qb->select('c')
->from('Category', 'c')
->join('c.module', 'm', 'WITH', 'm.name = :moduleName')
->setParameter('moduleName', $moduleName);
SELECT c0_.category_id AS category_id0, c0_.title AS title1, c0_.h1 AS h12, c0_.alias AS alias3,
c0_.insertion_fee AS insertion_fee4, c0_.description AS description5, c0_.parent_category_id AS
parent_category_id6, c0_.module_id AS module_id7 
FROM category c0_ 
INNER JOIN business_module b1_ ON c0_.module_id = b1_.module_id 
LEFT JOIN module m2_ ON b1_.module_id = m2_.module_id AND (m2_.name = ?)


 Comments   
Comment by Marek Štípek [ 06/Nov/13 ]

I am experiencing the same issue. The workarround could be to use LEFT JOIN with IS NOT NULL condition... But it also doesnt work after this commit
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/commit/d9c1782a4f6d46f66e9deb2c375830f9192d4482 (i had to revert to dev-master#13c1efb240dd0af25ad0abe230df98ec895892c7)





[DDC-2595] UoW is not supposed to trigger the post-load event for uninitialized proxies. Created: 06/Aug/13  Updated: 06/Aug/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Juti Noppornpitak Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 1
Labels: None


 Description   

When one entity have multiple nested levels and associated to 700+ other entities, the ORM exhausts a large amount of memory and execution time which exceeds either the memory limit or the maximum execution time.

Prerequisite:

1. generate an entity, named "Mr. G", with 4 nested levels of association.
2. ensure that the generated entity associating to 700+ entities.
3. create a post-load event listener which may or may not be restricted to uninitialized proxies.

How to Reproduce:

1. have a code to load the "Mr. G" entity.
X. (Done)

Notes:
The initial investigation indicates that UnitOfWork should not trigger the post-load event for uninitialized proxies.

One thing worth-mentioning is that if the event listener ignores all proxies, we will not have this problem. However, some properties (e.g., ones of type TEXT/BLOB) are not loaded into normal entities but they are loaded into the proxies.






[DDC-2596] With Access to ResultSetMapping, Paginator can decide on fetchJoinCollection and useoutputWalker Created: 07/Aug/13  Updated: 07/Aug/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Benjamin Eberlei Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None





[DDC-2567] auto generated index name cannot be overriden with annotation Created: 23/Jul/13  Updated: 23/Jul/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Nicolas Ricci Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Hi,

I have an unexpected behaviour when generating SQL from an entity using annotation.

The default indexes name (generated by _generateIdentifierName) are automatically overwriting the name I have specified in my entity.

I have patched the following file https://github.com/doctrine/dbal/blob/master/lib/Doctrine/DBAL/Schema/Table.php

with:
// check for duplicates
foreach ($this->_indexes as $idxKey => $existingIndex) {
if ($indexCandidate->isFullfilledBy($existingIndex))

{ //return $this; // old implementation unset($this->_indexes[$idxKey]); }

}

but I don't think this is the correct way forward.

Let me know if you require more information

Thanks






[DDC-2560] Schema tool invalid DDL syntax for default values Created: 19/Jul/13  Updated: 19/Jul/13

Status: Reopened
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Ben Davies Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: schematool
Environment:

Postgresql



 Description   

Not sure if this is Postgresql specific or not, but here are the reproduction steps:

Have a table with a column setup like so:

ALTER TABLE usr ADD COLUMN contact_count integer;
ALTER TABLE usr ALTER COLUMN contact_count SET NOT NULL;
ALTER TABLE usr ALTER COLUMN contact_count SET DEFAULT 0;

Have a Entity Column Definition like so:

    /**
     * @var integer $contactCount
     *
     * @ORM\Column(name="contact_count", type="integer", nullable=false)
     */
    private $contactCount = 0;

orm:schema-tool:update will generate the following SQL:

ALTER TABLE usr ALTER contact_count SET ;

adding

options={"default":0}

to the column definition results in no sql being generated (correctly I assume)



 Comments   
Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 19/Jul/13 ]

The ORM doesn't support default column values.
That's fine-tuning you can do on the column definitions.

Your "workaround" is actually the correct way of dealing with this kind of DDL change.

Comment by Ben Davies [ 19/Jul/13 ]

I realise the ORM doesn't support default values, but the point is that the schematool picks up a diff in the columns, tries to generate a diff, and generates an invalid sql statement. Surely that is a bug?

Comment by Marco Pivetta [ 19/Jul/13 ]

Ben Davies the DBAL is responsible for generating this wrong DDL... Are you able to reproduce this in DBAL only?

Comment by Ben Davies [ 19/Jul/13 ]

Happy to try.

Comment by Ben Davies [ 19/Jul/13 ]

here you go
https://github.com/bendavies/dbal/blob/DBAL-561/tests/Doctrine/Tests/DBAL/Functional/Ticket/DBAL561Test.php





[DDC-2528] Extracting entities through DQL query resets the previous associations Created: 24/Jun/13  Updated: 25/Jun/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.0
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Koustubh Sinhal Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

Windows 8



 Description   

I have the entities Purchase(owning side) and Product(inverse side) sharing bidirectional many to many relation. Now whatever associations I build between product and purchase entity, those associations are erased if by mistake I happen to run a join query between the products and purchase table. For example look at this code.

$purc = $em->find("\ZC\Entity\Purchase", 1); //Existing purchase entity
//Now this purchase entity is linked to 2 products through the join table
$prod = new \ZC\Entity\Product();
$prod->name= "newly";
$purc->addProduct($prod); //Added a new product to the collection
// print(count($purc->products));
$dql = "SELECT b,c FROM \ZC\Entity\Purchase b join b.products c where      b.id = 1";
$query = $this->entityManager->createQuery($dql);
$purc2 = $query->getResult()[0]; //Now this is same as $purc
print(count($purc->products));   //again prints 2

As you can see, when I have added a new entity $prod to the $purc, the number of products linked to $purc should have increased to 3. It seems the join overrides the previous associations formed. More strange is if I had fetched the products related to $purc from the tables before the join query(the commented code before dql), then the last print statement would have given 3.
I am facing a lot of similar issues.






[DDC-2495] Partial objects not working with STI Created: 10/Jun/13  Updated: 11/Jun/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.4
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Radoslaw Ejsmont Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: STI, dql, orm, partial
Environment:

Symfony2 project, Doctrine ORM with MySQL database backend


Attachments: File CrossVial.php     File Entity.php     File InjectionVial.php     File Stock.php     File StockVial.php     File Vial.php    

 Description   

When I try to create a query retrieving partial objects of a root class in single table inheritance hierarchy, the resulting SQL includes all fields from the whole class hierarchy.

DQL:
SELECT partial v.

{id, setupDate, flipDate}

FROM VIB\FliesBundle\Entity\Vial v WHERE v.id IN (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)

SQL:
SELECT v0_.setupDate AS setupDate0, v0_.flipDate AS flipDate1, v0_.id AS id2, v0_.type AS type3, v0_.parent_id AS parent_id4, v0_.position_id AS position_id5, v0_.prevPosition_id AS prevPosition_id6, v0_.incubator_id AS incubator_id7, v0_.stock_id AS stock_id8, v0_.male_id AS male_id9, v0_.virgin_id AS virgin_id10, v0_.targetStock_id AS targetStock_id11, v0_.targetStockVial_id AS targetStockVial_id12 FROM Vial v0_ WHERE (v0_.id IN (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)) AND v0_.type IN ('vial', 'stock', 'cross', 'injection')



 Comments   
Comment by Fabio B. Silva [ 10/Jun/13 ]

Could you please provide your entities ?

Thanks

Comment by Radoslaw Ejsmont [ 11/Jun/13 ]

This is the whole class hierarchy.

Comment by Radoslaw Ejsmont [ 11/Jun/13 ]

I have actually noticed, that the "partial" keyword is ignored even for entities that are not using any inheritance schema. So it seems that this keyword is generally ignored.

Right now the following query:

SELECT e, partial p.

{id}

, o, s FROM VIB\FliesBundle\Entity\StockVial e LEFT JOIN e.parent p LEFT JOIN e.position o LEFT JOIN e.stock s WHERE e.setupDate > :date AND e.trashed = false ORDER BY e.setupDate DESC ORDER BY e.id DESC

would result in the following SQL:

SELECT v0_.setupDate AS setupDate0, v0_.flipDate AS flipDate1, v0_.notes AS notes2, v0_.size AS size3, v0_.labelPrinted AS labelPrinted4, v0_.trashed AS trashed5, v0_.temperature AS temperature6, v0_.id AS id7, v1_.id AS id8, r2_.rackRow AS rackRow9, r2_.rackColumn AS rackColumn10, r2_.id AS id11, s3_.name AS name12, s3_.genotype AS genotype13, s3_.notes AS notes14, s3_.vendor AS vendor15, s3_.infoURL AS infoURL16, s3_.verified AS verified17, s3_.id AS id18, v0_.type AS type19, v0_.parent_id AS parent_id20, v0_.position_id AS position_id21, v0_.prevPosition_id AS prevPosition_id22, v0_.incubator_id AS incubator_id23, v0_.stock_id AS stock_id24, v1_.type AS type25, v1_.parent_id AS parent_id26, v1_.position_id AS position_id27, v1_.prevPosition_id AS prevPosition_id28, v1_.incubator_id AS incubator_id29, v1_.stock_id AS stock_id30, v1_.male_id AS male_id31, v1_.virgin_id AS virgin_id32, v1_.targetStock_id AS targetStock_id33, v1_.targetStockVial_id AS targetStockVial_id34, r2_.rack_id AS rack_id35, s3_.sourceCross_id AS sourceCross_id36 FROM Vial v0_ LEFT JOIN Vial v1_ ON v0_.parent_id = v1_.id AND v1_.type IN ('vial', 'stock', 'cross', 'injection') LEFT JOIN RackPosition r2_ ON v0_.position_id = r2_.id LEFT JOIN Stock s3_ ON v0_.stock_id = s3_.id WHERE (v0_.setupDate > '2013-04-11' AND v0_.trashed = 0) AND v0_.type IN ('stock') ORDER BY v0_.setupDate DESC, v0_.id DESC

Please note that ALL properties of parent have been included in the generated SQL.

You can find the whole project (Symfony2) on github: https://github.com/rejsmont/LabDB

Best,

R.

Comment by Radoslaw Ejsmont [ 11/Jun/13 ]

I have noticed that using the setHint(Doctrine\ORM\Query::HINT_FORCE_PARTIAL_LOAD, 1) forces partial load, however then even the entities I want loaded entirely (with proxied references) are partially loaded (i.e. all the references are forced to null, unless explicitly loaded via join).





[DDC-2452] Additional `WITH` condition in joins between JTI roots cause invalid SQL to be produced Created: 16/May/13  Updated: 27/Mar/14

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: DQL, ORM
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Marco Pivetta Assignee: Marco Pivetta
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: dql, sql-walker
Environment:

irrelevant



 Description   

Given a simple Joined Table Inheritance like following:

/**
 * @Entity @Table(name="foo") @InheritanceType("JOINED")
 * @DiscriminatorColumn(name="discr", type="string")
 * @DiscriminatorMap({"foo" = "DDC2452Foo", "bar" = "DDC2452Bar"})
 */
class DDC2452Foo
{
    /** @Id @Column(type="integer") @GeneratedValue */
    public $id;
}

/** @Entity @Table(name="bar") */
class DDC2452Bar extends DDC2452Foo
{
}

Following DQL

SELECT foo1 FROM DDC2452Foo foo1 JOIN DDC2452Foo foo2 WITH 1=1

Will produce broken SQL:

SELECT
    f0_.id AS id0, f0_.discr AS discr1 
FROM 
    foo f0_ 
LEFT JOIN bar b1_ 
    ON f0_.id = b1_.id 
LEFT JOIN foo f2_ 
LEFT JOIN bar b3_ 
    ON f2_.id = b3_.id 
    ON (1 = 1)

(please note the duplicate `ON` in the SQL)

That is caused because of the SQL walker producing the JTI filter with already the `ON` clause in it.

That happens because the JTI join conditions are added in https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/2.4.0-BETA2/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Query/SqlWalker.php#L823-L825 (`walkRangeVariableDeclaration`), while the additional defined `WITH` conditions are considered in `walkJoinAssociationDeclaration` later on.

Added a test case and fix at https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/pull/668






[DDC-2449] Amazon Redshift Support Created: 15/May/13  Updated: 15/May/13

Status: Awaiting Feedback
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: New Feature Priority: Major
Reporter: Kirill Fuchs Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Environment:

Amazon Redshift



 Description   

It would be nice to get doctrine compatible with Amazon Redshift. It uses a Postgres connector but there are some differences. I'm currently facing an issue with the primary id, in Redshift the generation of an id is different from Postgres and so I'm getting errors associated with generating an id.

Here are some references that might be useful:
node-orm faced the same issue and seems like they figured it out: https://github.com/dresende/node-orm2/issues/39

Amazon Manual:
http://awsdocs.s3.amazonaws.com/redshift/latest/redshift-dg.pdf






[DDC-2411] Null values get reset when rehydrating an already managed entity Created: 23/Apr/13  Updated: 09/May/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Simon Garner Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: hydration


 Description   

Scenario:

1) You have an entity with a ManyToOne relation (and probably other kinds too, but this is all I have tested) to another entity which is nullable. For example, let's say you have a Book entity which has an "illustrator" field which refers to a Person entity, representing the person who illustrated the book. If the book is not illustrated then you set the field to null.

2) You fetch a Book (by ID) which has its illustrator set to a particular Person.

3) You set that Book's illustrator to null.

4) Without flushing, you fetch the Book again, using different criteria: for example, by title. Because entities are Identity Mapped, this will run a query but then locate the same instance in memory, and try to hydrate that instance with the old data it just fetched.

5) Any fields on the instance that have modified values retain their new values (for example, if we changed the illustrator to a different Person, this would be retained), BUT any fields on the instance which are null get overwritten with the old data (so if we previously set the illustrator to null, without flushing, it would now be reset to the Person value that it had before).

There seems to be a mistaken assumption here that null values are fields that have not been hydrated, when this is not necessarily the case. Is this the intended behaviour?

The code that causes this behaviour is here: https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/e561f47cb2205565eb873f0643637477bfcfc2ff/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Internal/Hydration/ObjectHydrator.php#L471

If you are wondering why anybody would want to fetch the entity again in step 4, my use case for this is the Symfony Validator (but I presume there could be others).

If there are any unique constraints (Symfony ones, not Doctrine ones) on the entity, e.g. if we had a unique constraint on the Book title field, then when validating the Book the Symfony Validator would check if there are already any Book entities with the same title as the Book we're validating. It will find the Book that we are working with, and because entities are identity mapped, it will act upon the same instance, and the situation above occurs.

Code example:

<?php

// Create some entities

$john = new Person();
$john->setName('John Smith');

$jane = new Person();
$jane->setName('Jane Jones');

$joe = new Person();
$joe->setName('Joe Bloggs');

$book = new Book();
$book->setId(123);
$book->setTitle('Book Title');
$book->setIllustrator($john);
$book->setAuthor($jane);

$em->persist($john);
$em->persist($jane);
$em->persist($joe);
$em->persist($book);
$em->flush();

// Now let's try modifying the book

$book = $bookRepository->find(123);
$book->getIllustrator(); // returns Person "John Smith"
$book->getAuthor(); // returns Person "Jane Jones"

// make some changes
$book->setIllustrator(null); // illustrator is now null
$book->setAuthor($joe); // author is now "Joe Bloggs"

// now validate our changes with Symfony Validator
// note: the same effect can also be observed with
// $test = $bookRepository->findBy('title', 'Book Title');
$validator->validate($book);

// what happened to our book??
$book->getIllustrator(); // returns Person "John Smith" <- should be null
$book->getAuthor(); // returns Person "Joe Bloggs" <- correctly retains the new value



 Comments   
Comment by Fabio B. Silva [ 24/Apr/13 ]

Hi Simon,

Could you please try to write a failing test case or paste your entities ?

Cheers

Comment by Benjamin Eberlei [ 09/May/13 ]

Verified by code review that this issue exists, but it will be very tricky to fix, because the null check is there for other reasons as well.





[DDC-2401] INDEX BY not working on multiple columns Created: 16/Apr/13  Updated: 18/Apr/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: Documentation, ORM
Affects Version/s: 2.3.3
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Bug Priority: Major
Reporter: Quintenvk Assignee: Benjamin Eberlei
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None

Attachments: Zip Archive Testcase.zip    

 Description   

According to the docs on this page:
http://docs.doctrine-project.org/en/latest/reference/dql-doctrine-query-language.html#using-index-by

The following "multi-dimensional index" should be perfectly possible, with a default hydration mode:
SELECT b as business, p as product FROM Businesses b INDEX BY b.id JOIN Products p WITH b.id = p.businessid INDEX BY p.id

However, b.id is completely ignored (it is a numeric primary key).

I tried to go further, giving 2 products a matching barcode and indexing by barcode and then a (unique, numeric) productid. Only the barcode worked as a key and only one of the products with a matching barcode was selected. I used this query to test:
SELECT p FROM Products p INDEX BY p.barcode JOIN p.businessid b INDEX BY p.id

I also flagged the docs, because I don't think a userid should/could be starting from 0.



 Comments   
Comment by Fabio B. Silva [ 18/Apr/13 ]

Hi Quintenvk

Could you please try to write a failing test case ?

Thanks

Comment by Quintenvk [ 18/Apr/13 ]

I added a testcase. Please note that the database settings are to be configured in Core/simplys/simplys.php, and that the dump is in dummy.sql.

Apart from that all should run well immediately.

Comment by Quintenvk [ 18/Apr/13 ]

Fabio,

Please check the zip I just attached. I hope this helps you in finding the problem.

Thanks,
Quinten

Comment by Fabio B. Silva [ 18/Apr/13 ]

Thanks Quintenvk,

SELECT p.barcode, p.id, p.name FROM \core\Simplys\Entity\Products p INDEX BY p.barcode JOIN p.businessid b INDEX BY p.id

In this DQL you are trying to index by scalar values,
I think we does not support that, and a single dimensional array is the expected result in this case.

Also the INDEX BY documentations seems wrong to me.

The given DQL :

 SELECT u.id, u.status, upper(u.name) nameUpper FROM User u INDEX BY u.idJOIN u.phonenumbers p INDEX BY p.phonenumber 

Show the following result :

array
  0 =>
    array
      1 =>
        object(stdClass)[299]
          public '__CLASS__' => string 'Doctrine\Tests\Models\CMS\CmsUser' (length=33)
          public 'id' => int 1
          ..
      'nameUpper' => string 'ROMANB' (length=6)
  1 =>
    array
      2 =>
        object(stdClass)[298]
          public '__CLASS__' => string 'Doctrine\Tests\Models\CMS\CmsUser' (length=33)
          public 'id' => int 2
          ...
      'nameUpper' => string 'JWAGE' (length=5)

Which IMHO represents another DQL, something like :

 SELECT u, p , upper(u.name) nameUpper FROM User u INDEX BY u.id JOIN u.phonenumbers p INDEX BY p.phonenumber
Comment by Quintenvk [ 18/Apr/13 ]

Thanks for your reply Fabio.
Do you think there could be alternatives (apart from a foreach-loop) to achieve the expected result?

Thanks,
Quinten

Comment by Fabio B. Silva [ 18/Apr/13 ]

Not sure if it's exactly the result you need but you can try

Something like :

SELECT p, b FROM \core\Simplys\Entity\Products p INDEX BY p.barcode JOIN p.businessid b INDEX BY p.id

or something like :

SELECT PARTIAL p.{id, barcode, name}, b.{id, attributesYouNeed} FROM \core\Simplys\Entity\Products p INDEX BY p.barcode JOIN p.businessid b INDEX BY p.id

And than :

$result = $query->getArrayResult();
Comment by Quintenvk [ 18/Apr/13 ]

Both produce the same result as the query I had. I think i'll move on to loops after a bit more research, too bad it can't be done (at least for now) though... Would've been nice.

Thanks for your help though!





[DDC-2351] Entity Listener vs. Event Listener Created: 15/Mar/13  Updated: 15/Mar/13

Status: Open
Project: Doctrine 2 - ORM
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: Git Master
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All

Type: Improvement Priority: Major
Reporter: Fabian Spillner Assignee: Fabio B. Silva
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None


 Description   

Entity Listener and Event Listener don't get same events. An example is the onFlush event, which Entity Listener doesn't get. Why are both listeners receiving different events and not same events?

For consistency I'd like to see that both get same events - if I understand the purpose of Entity Listener correctly: it should be an alternative to Event Listener with same functionality but is bound to an entity.



 Comments