<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (5.2.7#850-sha1:b2af0c8dc8537b36121c6a579fabbdf79fc919e5) at Mon May 20 02:31:32 UTC 2013

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary add field=key&field=summary to the URL of your request.
For example:
http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/si/jira.issueviews:issue-xml/DCOM-6/DCOM-6.xml?field=key&field=summary
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Doctrine Project</title>
    <link>http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>5.2.7</version>
        <build-number>850</build-number>
        <build-date>21-02-2013</build-date>
    </build-info>

<item>
            <title>[DCOM-6] Non existant namespace alias throws a PHP Notice </title>
                <link>http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DCOM-6</link>
                <project id="10043" key="DCOM">Doctrine Common</project>
                        <description>&lt;p&gt;@nonalias:Annot results in a php notice.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
                <environment></environment>
            <key id="11419">DCOM-6</key>
            <summary>Non existant namespace alias throws a PHP Notice </summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/images/icons/issuetypes/bug.png">Bug</type>
                                <priority id="3" iconUrl="http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/images/icons/priorities/major.png">Major</priority>
                    <status id="5" iconUrl="http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png">Resolved</status>
                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                <assignee username="beberlei">Benjamin Eberlei</assignee>
                                <reporter username="merk">Tim Nagel</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 27 May 2010 04:37:37 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:13:34 +0000</updated>
                    <resolved>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:13:34 +0000</resolved>
                            <version>2.0.0-BETA2</version>
                                <fixVersion>2.0.0-RC1</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                    <votes>0</votes>
                        <watches>0</watches>
                        <comments>
                    <comment id="13068" author="merk" created="Thu, 27 May 2010 04:46:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Proposed tests and fix&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://github.com/merk/common/commit/65e8c10b74201c39dbe291c36230205d9b08ed65&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot;&gt;http://github.com/merk/common/commit/65e8c10b74201c39dbe291c36230205d9b08ed65&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    <comment id="14208" author="guilhermeblanco" created="Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:43:00 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;In commit: &lt;a href=&quot;http://github.com/doctrine/common/commit/ad49a676269af368563bd9a848c904b81a825622&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot;&gt;http://github.com/doctrine/common/commit/ad49a676269af368563bd9a848c904b81a825622&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I fixed this issue.&lt;br/&gt;
The validation on unexistent classes cannot be done correctly, otherwise it&apos;d conflict with phpDoc tags.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    <comment id="14209" author="merk" created="Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:03:57 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;What will your change do if there are multiple implementations of the Reader working on entities that dont have common namespaces, but still use namespaces?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would it not make more sense to skip something that the Reader doesnt understand, rather than throwing an error?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(For example, Symfony2&apos;s validator system might have namespaced validators, which would then cause the &apos;Doctrine&apos; reader to throw an exception)&lt;/p&gt;
</comment>
                    <comment id="14217" author="guilhermeblanco" created="Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:06:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yes, you&apos;re right...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think we&apos;ll have to silently bypass unknown aliases... this makes debug harder, but we don&apos;t have any other option. =(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reopening it&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    <comment id="14218" author="beberlei" created="Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:13:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fixed to skip the unknown alias annotation.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                </comments>
                    <attachments>
                </attachments>
            <subtasks>
        </subtasks>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>