<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (5.2.7#850-sha1:b2af0c8dc8537b36121c6a579fabbdf79fc919e5) at Sat May 18 18:06:32 UTC 2013

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary add field=key&field=summary to the URL of your request.
For example:
http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/si/jira.issueviews:issue-xml/DBAL-76/DBAL-76.xml?field=key&field=summary
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Doctrine Project</title>
    <link>http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>5.2.7</version>
        <build-number>850</build-number>
        <build-date>21-02-2013</build-date>
    </build-info>

<item>
            <title>[DBAL-76] PostgreSQL Platform list* SQL code is in need of serious love</title>
                <link>http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DBAL-76</link>
                <project id="10040" key="DBAL">Doctrine DBAL</project>
                        <description>&lt;p&gt;The Postgres Schema code is very hard to read and inconsistent across the board. Some use pg_class, some pg_tables. Namespaces /Schema are not always properly checked for. There should be a really unified way on how to approach schema query issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
            <key id="12220">DBAL-76</key>
            <summary>PostgreSQL Platform list* SQL code is in need of serious love</summary>
                <type id="4" iconUrl="http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/images/icons/issuetypes/improvement.png">Improvement</type>
                                <priority id="3" iconUrl="http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/images/icons/priorities/major.png">Major</priority>
                    <status id="1" iconUrl="http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/images/icons/statuses/open.png">Open</status>
                    <resolution id="-1">Unresolved</resolution>
                                <assignee username="beberlei">Benjamin Eberlei</assignee>
                                <reporter username="beberlei">Benjamin Eberlei</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 08:08:01 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:05:08 +0000</updated>
                                                                            <due></due>
                    <votes>0</votes>
                        <watches>1</watches>
                        <comments>
                    <comment id="15963" author="ddebernardy" created="Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:05:08 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m not sure what this ticket is about exactly, but...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Namespaces /Schema are not always properly checked for.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Usually, one would not want to specify them and set the search_path instead. Or are you meaning the schema analysis queries used internally? (If so, yes, it kind of sucks in that case, but note that there are a bunch of *_is_visible() methods, e.g. pg_catalog.pg_table_is_visible(rel.oid) which will strip out invisible schemas directly. This may be simpler than injecting schema references all over the place in that it also processes permissions.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, note that PG has a whole bunch of pg_catalog views, which are available in the information_schema.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                </comments>
                    <attachments>
                </attachments>
            <subtasks>
        </subtasks>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>