Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: None
Security Level: All
As i understand the documentation correctly, orphanRemoval associations have the meaning of a "part of" relationship. In the example (http://www.doctrine-project.org/docs/orm/2.0/en/reference/working-with-associations.html#orphan-removal) the adresses are part of the contact.
In my opinion we should reason that the state of the adress consists of the states of all nested contacts. As a consequence we should flag the contact as "dirty" when the adresses change.
This is relevant for optimistic locking scenarios or event handlers. In my application i tried to use optimistic locking for "contacts", which does not work if i don't change anything in the contact but only in the nested addresses.
|Field||Original Value||New Value|
|Affects Version/s||2.1.4 [ 10165 ]|
|Affects Version/s||2.1.3 [ 10164 ]|
|Issue Type||Improvement [ 4 ]||Bug [ 1 ]|
|Issue Type||Bug [ 1 ]||Improvement [ 4 ]|
|Workflow||jira [ 13212 ]||jira-feedback [ 13992 ]|
|Workflow||jira-feedback [ 13992 ]||jira-feedback2 [ 15856 ]|
|Workflow||jira-feedback2 [ 15856 ]||jira-feedback3 [ 18112 ]|