Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Drivers
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Postgresql >= 8.4

      Description

      Hi,

      Since at least postgres 8.4 , pg support arrays...
      it could be nice if doctrine could read them as a type instead of use a string for it.
      Postgresql also offer a sort of hash array named hstore...

      Thanks

      http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/arrays.html

      http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/hstore.html

        Activity

        Hide
        Benjamin Eberlei added a comment -

        See https://github.com/easybiblabs/EasyBib_DoctrineTypes for an implementation of PostgreSQL Hstore. Arrays can be implemented the same way.

        Show
        Benjamin Eberlei added a comment - See https://github.com/easybiblabs/EasyBib_DoctrineTypes for an implementation of PostgreSQL Hstore. Arrays can be implemented the same way.
        Hide
        Karsten Dambekalns added a comment -

        Coming back to this and still wonder why it cannot be implemented. Could even be a solution / combined with DBAL-369

        Show
        Karsten Dambekalns added a comment - Coming back to this and still wonder why it cannot be implemented. Could even be a solution / combined with DBAL-369
        Hide
        Karsten Dambekalns added a comment -

        Why is this not to be implemented? It can be used by the PostgreSQL driver without anything above it needing change - all platform drivers exist precisely to deal with implementation specifics… No?

        Show
        Karsten Dambekalns added a comment - Why is this not to be implemented? It can be used by the PostgreSQL driver without anything above it needing change - all platform drivers exist precisely to deal with implementation specifics… No?
        Hide
        Benjamin Eberlei added a comment -

        This will not be implemented as it is implementation specific whereas Doctrine features need to be supported by all vendors.

        You can already implement this with custom types though, i remember testing this some time ago.

        Show
        Benjamin Eberlei added a comment - This will not be implemented as it is implementation specific whereas Doctrine features need to be supported by all vendors. You can already implement this with custom types though, i remember testing this some time ago.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Benjamin Eberlei
            Reporter:
            Brice Maron
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: